Klopp's new role

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7686
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3384 times
Been thanked: 1749 times

Klopp's new role

Post by gshaw »

Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?

Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12501
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2555 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

The money . RB Orient sounds quite catchy
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4716
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 2068 times
Been thanked: 1694 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Proposition Joe »

No - wouldn't be Orient any more.
Last edited by Proposition Joe on Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Constanza
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2085
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:31 pm
Has thanked: 168 times
Been thanked: 754 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Constanza »

No thank you
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14316
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2509 times
Been thanked: 3298 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Long slender neck »

Red Bull Orient.

Yeah probably a good umbrella to be under really
Bandy Legs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:37 pm
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 26 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Bandy Legs »

Can we not just sell up to Disney TV & get rid of Welcome to Wrexham & say a hello to a Lifetime of Leyton Orient?
User avatar
OyinbO
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2067
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:28 pm
Location: London
Has thanked: 1413 times
Been thanked: 707 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by OyinbO »

gshaw wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:13 pm Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?

Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
The evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.
Mistadobalina
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2432
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 244 times
Been thanked: 1125 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Mistadobalina »

Multi club ownership is rank, the idea of being part of any feeder system of clubs wouldn't sit right at all.
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7686
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3384 times
Been thanked: 1749 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by gshaw »

Mistadobalina wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 7:03 pm Multi club ownership is rank, the idea of being part of any feeder system of clubs wouldn't sit right at all.
Yeah we wouldn't want to be fielding a squad of other clubs' youth players now would we :~
User avatar
Currywurst and Chips
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6222
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
Has thanked: 389 times
Been thanked: 1486 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Currywurst and Chips »

I’d love it, some succes would be a beautiful thing and so long as we maintained Orient in the name that’s all that matters

We don’t really have an affinity with Leyton and the club has moved around and not always been based in E10. Orient is the only constant throughout and that could be the case if we were RB Orient playing in front of 20,000 fans in Romford or Harlow in the Championship 😍
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9036
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1074 times
Been thanked: 2499 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Dunners »

Easy decision really. Anyone turning their nose up at this is just being pretentious.

Got to accept that the times change and if you don't change with them, then you get left behind. Lots of fans would be up for this. Even if they won't admit it to themselves.
Scuba Diver
Fresh Alias
Posts: 988
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:46 pm
Location: Nailed to a wall in Chiswick
Has thanked: 328 times
Been thanked: 334 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Scuba Diver »

I think I wouldn't necessarily be against at inception, but would inadvertently lose interest quite quickly.

Harlow or Romford smacks of an MK Dons-esque switch in so far as all connection with E10 (or E5 as formerly) is gone.

It would just be a new club, that happened to be called 'Orient' - - doubtless that would be enough for some.

However not to worry - even *if RB were interested, I'm sure they'd have a good look at it and decide better options lay elsewhere. I get the OP only asked the question hypothetically of course.
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7686
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3384 times
Been thanked: 1749 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by gshaw »

Scuba Diver wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:13 pm However not to worry - even *if RB were interested, I'm sure they'd have a good look at it and decide better options lay elsewhere. I get the OP only asked the question hypothetically of course.
Yeah you'll be shocked to know I'm not carrying secret intel or testing the waters for a buyout :D

Just hypothetically it'd be an interesting one though, a fairly cheap London club that's in a position for rebranding in a different stadium, only two hops away from the Prem riches. Technically easier than what they did with the German side who were 5th tier so Wikipedia tells me.
BiggsyMalone
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4444
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 895 times
Been thanked: 963 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by BiggsyMalone »

They’ve not done it to Leeds
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10538
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4569 times
Been thanked: 3236 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

Depends how they ran the club. They would probably be better than a lot of chancers with money looking to move into football
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2242
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 812 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by The Reverend »

What is this bizarre obsession people have with a new stadium?
User avatar
Hoover Attack
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5024
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
Has thanked: 635 times
Been thanked: 1264 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Hoover Attack »

OyinbO wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:40 pm
gshaw wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:13 pm Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?

Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
The evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.
This.

Look how - most of - our fanbase lapped up Bechetti and his entourage when that hit our club 10 years ago. They were happy to ignore all the nonsense that came with it for an enhanced playing budget.
User avatar
OyinbO
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2067
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:28 pm
Location: London
Has thanked: 1413 times
Been thanked: 707 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by OyinbO »

Hoover Attack wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:55 am
OyinbO wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:40 pm
gshaw wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:13 pm Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?

Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
The evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.
This.

Look how - most of - our fanbase lapped up Bechetti and his entourage when that hit our club 10 years ago. They were happy to ignore all the nonsense that came with it for an enhanced playing budget.
A great many of them right up until the point he finally scarpered after the LOFT protest in November 2016. Some even continued to defend him after that, and even blamed LOFT for chasing him away. There is no love like that which some football fans have for rich idiots.
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10538
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4569 times
Been thanked: 3236 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

OyinbO wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 8:03 am
Hoover Attack wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:55 am
OyinbO wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:40 pm

The evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.
This.

Look how - most of - our fanbase lapped up Bechetti and his entourage when that hit our club 10 years ago. They were happy to ignore all the nonsense that came with it for an enhanced playing budget.
A great many of them right up until the point he finally scarpered after the LOFT protest in November 2016. Some even continued to defend him after that, and even blamed LOFT for chasing him away. There is no love like that which some football fans have for rich idiots.
Plus the constant bleeting about the owners putting more money in this season.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12501
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2555 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

OyinbO wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:40 pm
gshaw wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:13 pm Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?

Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
The evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.
Correct . As a general rule the clubs with all the money are at the top and the clubs that haven't are at the bottom . I'd rather Orient were at the top
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4716
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 2068 times
Been thanked: 1694 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Proposition Joe »

BiggsyMalone wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:38 pm They’ve not done it to Leeds
Because they've only bought a minority stake.
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4716
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 2068 times
Been thanked: 1694 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Proposition Joe »

RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:51 am
OyinbO wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:40 pm
gshaw wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:13 pm Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?

Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
The evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.
Correct . As a general rule the clubs with all the money are at the top and the clubs that haven't are at the bottom . I'd rather Orient were at the top
Guess this marks out the difference between people who follow football and consider its just about winning at all costs and hang the ethics or consequences and those who still believe it's about something else. For those that fall into the latter camp, don't really understand why they don't just support another team.
User avatar
Hoover Attack
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5024
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
Has thanked: 635 times
Been thanked: 1264 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Hoover Attack »

OyinbO wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 8:03 am
Hoover Attack wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:55 am
OyinbO wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:40 pm

The evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.
This.

Look how - most of - our fanbase lapped up Bechetti and his entourage when that hit our club 10 years ago. They were happy to ignore all the nonsense that came with it for an enhanced playing budget.
A great many of them right up until the point he finally scarpered after the LOFT protest in November 2016. Some even continued to defend him after that, and even blamed LOFT for chasing him away. There is no love like that which some football fans have for rich idiots.
Not just defending him. Defending the things and the people he brought in. That f*cking tv show. That silly sausage who was a QS by trade or something but faking it as an ex player. All fine aparently, when backed up by £££s.
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4716
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 2068 times
Been thanked: 1694 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by Proposition Joe »

Hoover Attack wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:55 am
OyinbO wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:40 pm
gshaw wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:13 pm Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?

Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
The evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.
This.

Look how - most of - our fanbase lapped up Bechetti and his entourage when that hit our club 10 years ago. They were happy to ignore all the nonsense that came with it for an enhanced playing budget.
But he high fived fans in the car park Dagenham and gave Dosenna £9k a week!! How can you say he was bad?
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7686
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3384 times
Been thanked: 1749 times

Re: Klopp's new role

Post by gshaw »

Proposition Joe wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:57 am
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:51 am
OyinbO wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:40 pm

The evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.
Correct . As a general rule the clubs with all the money are at the top and the clubs that haven't are at the bottom . I'd rather Orient were at the top
Guess this marks out the difference between people who follow football and consider its just about winning at all costs and hang the ethics or consequences and those who still believe it's about something else. For those that fall into the latter camp, don't really understand why they don't just support another team.
I'm in the "win at all costs" camp as that's what professional sport is all about. I really couldn't care less for the "community" ethos thing that often gets bandied around as a USP at Orient.

As for why not another team... you don't choose your team it's often passed through family etc. and that doesn't change.

As for the mad Italian, all he had to do was provide the funds and leave the football side well alone and he could've had all the adulation T&T have experienced but his ego was too big, hence ending in a circus. Big money isn't intrinsically bad, it's how the owners spend it and manage the club.
The Reverend wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 10:42 pm What is this bizarre obsession people have with a new stadium?
The chance to control our own destiny free of the shackles and money drain that Hearn has placed on the club. Just remember at at, say £300 a pop the first 1000 ST sales go straight into his pocket every season
Post Reply