Klopp's new role
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7698
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3391 times
- Been thanked: 1750 times
Klopp's new role
Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?
Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12502
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2555 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4725
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2071 times
- Been thanked: 1696 times
Re: Klopp's new role
No - wouldn't be Orient any more.
Last edited by Proposition Joe on Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14325
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2511 times
- Been thanked: 3301 times
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:37 pm
- Has thanked: 58 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: Klopp's new role
Can we not just sell up to Disney TV & get rid of Welcome to Wrexham & say a hello to a Lifetime of Leyton Orient?
- OyinbO
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2067
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:28 pm
- Location: London
- Has thanked: 1413 times
- Been thanked: 707 times
Re: Klopp's new role
The evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.gshaw wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:13 pm Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?
Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
- Has thanked: 244 times
- Been thanked: 1126 times
Re: Klopp's new role
Multi club ownership is rank, the idea of being part of any feeder system of clubs wouldn't sit right at all.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7698
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3391 times
- Been thanked: 1750 times
Re: Klopp's new role
Yeah we wouldn't want to be fielding a squad of other clubs' youth players now would weMistadobalina wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 7:03 pm Multi club ownership is rank, the idea of being part of any feeder system of clubs wouldn't sit right at all.
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
Re: Klopp's new role
I’d love it, some succes would be a beautiful thing and so long as we maintained Orient in the name that’s all that matters
We don’t really have an affinity with Leyton and the club has moved around and not always been based in E10. Orient is the only constant throughout and that could be the case if we were RB Orient playing in front of 20,000 fans in Romford or Harlow in the Championship
We don’t really have an affinity with Leyton and the club has moved around and not always been based in E10. Orient is the only constant throughout and that could be the case if we were RB Orient playing in front of 20,000 fans in Romford or Harlow in the Championship
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9044
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
Re: Klopp's new role
Easy decision really. Anyone turning their nose up at this is just being pretentious.
Got to accept that the times change and if you don't change with them, then you get left behind. Lots of fans would be up for this. Even if they won't admit it to themselves.
Got to accept that the times change and if you don't change with them, then you get left behind. Lots of fans would be up for this. Even if they won't admit it to themselves.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 990
- Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:46 pm
- Location: Nailed to a wall in Chiswick
- Has thanked: 330 times
- Been thanked: 335 times
Re: Klopp's new role
I think I wouldn't necessarily be against at inception, but would inadvertently lose interest quite quickly.
Harlow or Romford smacks of an MK Dons-esque switch in so far as all connection with E10 (or E5 as formerly) is gone.
It would just be a new club, that happened to be called 'Orient' - - doubtless that would be enough for some.
However not to worry - even *if RB were interested, I'm sure they'd have a good look at it and decide better options lay elsewhere. I get the OP only asked the question hypothetically of course.
Harlow or Romford smacks of an MK Dons-esque switch in so far as all connection with E10 (or E5 as formerly) is gone.
It would just be a new club, that happened to be called 'Orient' - - doubtless that would be enough for some.
However not to worry - even *if RB were interested, I'm sure they'd have a good look at it and decide better options lay elsewhere. I get the OP only asked the question hypothetically of course.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7698
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3391 times
- Been thanked: 1750 times
Re: Klopp's new role
Yeah you'll be shocked to know I'm not carrying secret intel or testing the waters for a buyoutScuba Diver wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:13 pm However not to worry - even *if RB were interested, I'm sure they'd have a good look at it and decide better options lay elsewhere. I get the OP only asked the question hypothetically of course.
Just hypothetically it'd be an interesting one though, a fairly cheap London club that's in a position for rebranding in a different stadium, only two hops away from the Prem riches. Technically easier than what they did with the German side who were 5th tier so Wikipedia tells me.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4444
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 895 times
- Been thanked: 963 times
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10550
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3248 times
Re: Klopp's new role
Depends how they ran the club. They would probably be better than a lot of chancers with money looking to move into football
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2250
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 814 times
- Been thanked: 933 times
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 1271 times
Re: Klopp's new role
This.OyinbO wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:40 pmThe evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.gshaw wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:13 pm Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?
Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
Look how - most of - our fanbase lapped up Bechetti and his entourage when that hit our club 10 years ago. They were happy to ignore all the nonsense that came with it for an enhanced playing budget.
- OyinbO
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2067
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:28 pm
- Location: London
- Has thanked: 1413 times
- Been thanked: 707 times
Re: Klopp's new role
A great many of them right up until the point he finally scarpered after the LOFT protest in November 2016. Some even continued to defend him after that, and even blamed LOFT for chasing him away. There is no love like that which some football fans have for rich idiots.Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:55 amThis.OyinbO wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:40 pmThe evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.gshaw wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:13 pm Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?
Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
Look how - most of - our fanbase lapped up Bechetti and his entourage when that hit our club 10 years ago. They were happy to ignore all the nonsense that came with it for an enhanced playing budget.
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10550
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3248 times
Re: Klopp's new role
Plus the constant bleeting about the owners putting more money in this season.OyinbO wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 8:03 amA great many of them right up until the point he finally scarpered after the LOFT protest in November 2016. Some even continued to defend him after that, and even blamed LOFT for chasing him away. There is no love like that which some football fans have for rich idiots.Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:55 amThis.
Look how - most of - our fanbase lapped up Bechetti and his entourage when that hit our club 10 years ago. They were happy to ignore all the nonsense that came with it for an enhanced playing budget.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12502
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2555 times
Re: Klopp's new role
Correct . As a general rule the clubs with all the money are at the top and the clubs that haven't are at the bottom . I'd rather Orient were at the topOyinbO wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:40 pmThe evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.gshaw wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:13 pm Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?
Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4725
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2071 times
- Been thanked: 1696 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4725
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2071 times
- Been thanked: 1696 times
Re: Klopp's new role
Guess this marks out the difference between people who follow football and consider its just about winning at all costs and hang the ethics or consequences and those who still believe it's about something else. For those that fall into the latter camp, don't really understand why they don't just support another team.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:51 amCorrect . As a general rule the clubs with all the money are at the top and the clubs that haven't are at the bottom . I'd rather Orient were at the topOyinbO wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:40 pmThe evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.gshaw wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:13 pm Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?
Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 1271 times
Re: Klopp's new role
Not just defending him. Defending the things and the people he brought in. That f*cking tv show. That silly sausage who was a QS by trade or something but faking it as an ex player. All fine aparently, when backed up by £££s.OyinbO wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 8:03 amA great many of them right up until the point he finally scarpered after the LOFT protest in November 2016. Some even continued to defend him after that, and even blamed LOFT for chasing him away. There is no love like that which some football fans have for rich idiots.Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:55 amThis.
Look how - most of - our fanbase lapped up Bechetti and his entourage when that hit our club 10 years ago. They were happy to ignore all the nonsense that came with it for an enhanced playing budget.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4725
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2071 times
- Been thanked: 1696 times
Re: Klopp's new role
But he high fived fans in the car park Dagenham and gave Dosenna £9k a week!! How can you say he was bad?Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 6:55 amThis.OyinbO wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:40 pmThe evidence of the last decade or so at Orient (and other Clubs) suggests that the overwhelming majority of fans would go along with anything so long as money was getting spaffed on their Club.gshaw wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:13 pm Just seen a post on socials welcoming Klopp to his new role at RB and it got me thinking, if that group came along tomorrow to take the club over and invest into it as RB Orient would you take it?
Say they financed a new ground and players sourced from within the RB group but with the trade-off of branding etc. changing, would you take the money or stay as-is?
Look how - most of - our fanbase lapped up Bechetti and his entourage when that hit our club 10 years ago. They were happy to ignore all the nonsense that came with it for an enhanced playing budget.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7698
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3391 times
- Been thanked: 1750 times
Re: Klopp's new role
I'm in the "win at all costs" camp as that's what professional sport is all about. I really couldn't care less for the "community" ethos thing that often gets bandied around as a USP at Orient.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:57 amGuess this marks out the difference between people who follow football and consider its just about winning at all costs and hang the ethics or consequences and those who still believe it's about something else. For those that fall into the latter camp, don't really understand why they don't just support another team.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:51 amCorrect . As a general rule the clubs with all the money are at the top and the clubs that haven't are at the bottom . I'd rather Orient were at the top
As for why not another team... you don't choose your team it's often passed through family etc. and that doesn't change.
As for the mad Italian, all he had to do was provide the funds and leave the football side well alone and he could've had all the adulation T&T have experienced but his ego was too big, hence ending in a circus. Big money isn't intrinsically bad, it's how the owners spend it and manage the club.
The chance to control our own destiny free of the shackles and money drain that Hearn has placed on the club. Just remember at at, say £300 a pop the first 1000 ST sales go straight into his pocket every seasonThe Reverend wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 10:42 pm What is this bizarre obsession people have with a new stadium?