Israel

[Daily Express bot]

Comment about Malcolm Riflind about three above mocking the former very experienced Defence Secretary’Malcolm Rifling F LOL’

I suggested that it could have been worse had we had Thornberry or Healy.

I then merely pointed out that Corbyn nearly achieving high office was due to Miliband . I meant he lost an election and should not have been leader in first place as David Miliband was the better prospect by far.

I would have voted for Miliband like I voted for Blair. Unfortunately, Blair turned out to be a ready poised warmonger.

What could have been worse under Corbyn? Please feel free to add some workings when you present your answer

Well he has historically sided with Terrorist groups ( most MPs classed the groups he supported as terrorists , except for a select few, His fellow left wing colleagues.

He spent over thirty years on the back benches voting against almost everything his party and the conservatives introduce. Showed no interest in a cabinet or leadership candidacy.

He was a staunch anti EU politician, then as leader sat on the fence.

His cabinet appointed were highly inexperienced .

He has been antisemitic , whip withdrawn.

None of his re nationalisation ideas added up.

His general stance on Nuclear Deterrence , the armed forces, NATO and Defence would have left us extremely vulnerable.

Don’t get me wrong the Tories have been very bad in many examples but like the result of the election proved, when push came to shove, the average votor saw Corbyn as a disaster and despite doing well , he did not win.

[Daily Express bot]

LCL why do you keep using the term Sovereign State so weirdly and also why do you keep capitalising it?

Yes you are right , no need for capitals. It is a recognised sovereign state by most of the world except by a few Muslim nations led by unelected despots. For this reason , long term peace is almost impossible.

[Stowaway]

Comment about Malcolm Riflind about three above mocking the former very experienced Defence Secretary’Malcolm Rifling F LOL’

I suggested that it could have been worse had we had Thornberry or Healy.

I then merely pointed out that Corbyn nearly achieving high office was due to Miliband . I meant he lost an election and should not have been leader in first place as David Miliband was the better prospect by far.

I would have voted for Miliband like I voted for Blair. Unfortunately, Blair turned out to be a ready poised warmonger.

What could have been worse under Corbyn? Please feel free to add some workings when you present your answer

Well he has historically sided with Terrorist groups ( most MPs classed the groups he supported as terrorists , except for a select few, His fellow left wing colleagues.

He spent over thirty years on the back benches voting against almost everything his party and the conservatives introduce. Showed no interest in a cabinet or leadership candidacy.

He was a staunch anti EU politician, then as leader sat on the fence.

His cabinet appointed were highly inexperienced .

He has been antisemitic , whip withdrawn.

None of his re nationalisation ideas added up.

His general stance on Nuclear Deterrence , the armed forces, NATO and Defence would have left us extremely vulnerable.

Don’t get me wrong the Tories have been very bad in many examples but like the result of the election proved, when push came to shove, the average votor saw Corbyn as a disaster and despite doing well , he did not win.

I’ve tried to give you the benefit of doubt, but it’s now 8pm (local time) here, and I’ve finally had to conclude that you’re what we would have called at school (edited).

On foe you go.

[Daily Express bot]

What could have been worse under Corbyn? Please feel free to add some workings when you present your answer

Well he has historically sided with Terrorist groups ( most MPs classed the groups he supported as terrorists , except for a select few, His fellow left wing colleagues.

He spent over thirty years on the back benches voting against almost everything his party and the conservatives introduce. Showed no interest in a cabinet or leadership candidacy.

He was a staunch anti EU politician, then as leader sat on the fence.

His cabinet appointed were highly inexperienced .

He has been antisemitic , whip withdrawn.

None of his re nationalisation ideas added up.

His general stance on Nuclear Deterrence , the armed forces, NATO and Defence would have left us extremely vulnerable.

Don’t get me wrong the Tories have been very bad in many examples but like the result of the election proved, when push came to shove, the average votor saw Corbyn as a disaster and despite doing well , he did not win.

I’ve tried to give you the benefit of doubt, but it’s now 8pm (local time) here, and I’ve finally had to conclude that you’re what we would have called at school “an utter edited”.

On foe you go.

Bit of a derogatory term that? Some people have family and friends who are disabled. In fact that phrase went out many years ago with Mencap dropping the former name. Your hero Corbyn would never use such language either. Shame on you.

[Dunners]

On the topic of misinformation, I've already provided a possible example of this from Hamas. So for balance, here's a possible example from the Israeli side.

The footage is reportedly taken from a video game.

[Admin]

Comment about Malcolm Riflind about three above mocking the former very experienced Defence Secretary’Malcolm Rifling F LOL’

I suggested that it could have been worse had we had Thornberry or Healy.

I then merely pointed out that Corbyn nearly achieving high office was due to Miliband . I meant he lost an election and should not have been leader in first place as David Miliband was the better prospect by far.

I would have voted for Miliband like I voted for Blair. Unfortunately, Blair turned out to be a ready poised warmonger.

What could have been worse under Corbyn? Please feel free to add some workings when you present your answer

Well he has historically sided with Terrorist groups ( most MPs classed the groups he supported as terrorists , except for a select few, His fellow left wing colleagues.

He spent over thirty years on the back benches voting against almost everything his party and the conservatives introduce. Showed no interest in a cabinet or leadership candidacy.

He was a staunch anti EU politician, then as leader sat on the fence.

His cabinet appointed were highly inexperienced .

He has been antisemitic , whip withdrawn.

None of his re nationalisation ideas added up.

His general stance on Nuclear Deterrence , the armed forces, NATO and Defence would have left us extremely vulnerable.

Don’t get me wrong the Tories have been very bad in many examples but like the result of the election proved, when push came to shove, the average votor saw Corbyn as a disaster and despite doing well , he did not win.

Have you ever met Dohnut who used to frequent these parts? You are very similar…. Were you ever a president in business?

In response.

1. Your claim on anti semitism is entirely incorrect. He had the whip withdrawn for his response to the EHRC report into anti-semitism.
2. Nationalisation things like utilities etc are quite popular with the electorate. Nationalising parts of the railway is already taking place.
3. Might come as a surprise but a socialist is likely to oppose conservative / neo liberal policies. Feel free to let me know which things he voted against that turned out badly for him,
4. Corbyn / Labour we’re committed to NATO membership and the nuclear deterrent during his leadership.

Still be interested to know how you think he’d have made things worse than they are already? Seeing as the country and the economy is an utter f*cking skip fire.

Always amazed how 3 years on from his departure, supposed sensible moderates still seem obsessed by a 75 year old socialist and peace campaigner who proposed nothing more radical than funding public services and nationalising things we used to own.

[BoniO]

Maybe it's because they have nothing else.

[Admin]

FAO Stowaway.

I’ve edited your post. The term used within is not acceptable.

First offence means you escape a banning. Please do not use that term again.

FTC

[Daily Express bot]

I don’t know doughnut. To give Corbyn his due , he does stick by his principles and is unwavering. He does stand up for the small man and is extremely articulate. I think how he was even nominated scare the life out of the party generally and I think it was the £3 or £4 membership that allowed this. I think they may have changed this now possibly.

Whatever the reason for his suspension from Labour, I think Starmer prefers him out of the picture as he knows his endorsement of him will come back to haunt him in the neck t campaign. Maybe Starmer is pulling strings to delay his judgement for as long as possible.

[Proposition Joe]

He has been antisemitic

You were picked up on this lie the other day, why have you repeated it?

[Tuffers#2]

What could have been worse under Corbyn? Please feel free to add some workings when you present your answer

Well he has historically sided with Terrorist groups ( most MPs classed the groups he supported as terrorists , except for a select few, His fellow left wing colleagues.

He spent over thirty years on the back benches voting against almost everything his party and the conservatives introduce. Showed no interest in a cabinet or leadership candidacy.

He was a staunch anti EU politician, then as leader sat on the fence.

His cabinet appointed were highly inexperienced .

He has been antisemitic , whip withdrawn.

None of his re nationalisation ideas added up.

His general stance on Nuclear Deterrence , the armed forces, NATO and Defence would have left us extremely vulnerable.

Don’t get me wrong the Tories have been very bad in many examples but like the result of the election proved, when push came to shove, the average votor saw Corbyn as a disaster and despite doing well , he did not win.

Have you ever met Dohnut who used to frequent these parts? You are very similar…. Were you ever a president in business?

In response.

1. Your claim on anti semitism is entirely incorrect. He had the whip withdrawn for his response to the EHRC report into anti-semitism.
2. Nationalisation things like utilities etc are quite popular with the electorate. Nationalising parts of the railway is already taking place.
3. Might come as a surprise but a socialist is likely to oppose conservative / neo liberal policies. Feel free to let me know which things he voted against that turned out badly for him,
4. Corbyn / Labour we’re committed to NATO membership and the nuclear deterrent during his leadership.

Still be interested to know how you think he’d have made things worse than they are already? Seeing as the country and the economy is an utter f*cking skip fire.

Always amazed how 3 years on from his departure, supposed sensible moderates still seem obsessed by a 75 year old socialist and peace campaigner who proposed nothing more radical than funding public services and nationalising things we used to own.

Ive wondered if LCL & Monkey Boy are Twins.

[Long slender neck]

I was thinking Loin Cloth Spenny

[Daily Express bot]

He has been antisemitic

You were picked up on this lie the other day, why have you repeated it?

I’ll go with this BBC official version which is I think your point?

He has not be suspend for embracing Jews enthusiastically.

Historically as supported Palestinian’s over Israelis.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-65102128.amp

[Max B Gold]

He has been antisemitic

You were picked up on this lie the other day, why have you repeated it?

Put him on foe. Do NOT feed the IMBECILES.

[The Reverend]

FAO Stowaway.

I’ve edited your post. The term used within is not acceptable.

First offence means you escape a banning. Please do not use that term again.

FTC

Good on you for amending the original comment but I thought you might want to know that there’s a post a few above this one where LCL quotes Stowaway and his incredibly offensive slur can still be seen. I’ve reported it so you can see which one it is.

Could I ask that you (or LCL) also amend that post because it’s quite shocking to see that phrase anywhere on this board.

[spen666]

I was thinking Loin Cloth Spenny

That is both untrue and defamatory

I would invite you to remove the false claim without the need for me to invoke the legal process

[Proposition Joe]

He has been antisemitic

You were picked up on this lie the other day, why have you repeated it?

I’ll go with this BBC official version which is I think your point?

He has not be suspend for embracing Jews enthusiastically.

Historically as supported Palestinian’s over Israelis.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-65102128.amp

It's embarrassing how you won't just acknowledge you're still wrong and instead respond with some meaningless word salad.

[Proposition Joe]

Also, how have you managed to break the Quote function? It's not possible to reply properly to your posts.

[Dunners]

Also, how have you managed to break the Quote function? It's not possible to reply properly to your posts.

It's to spare the rest of us from those of you who have not yet foed the gobsh*te.

[Daily Express bot]

You were picked up on this lie the other day, why have you repeated it?

I’ll go with this BBC official version which is I think your point?

He has not be suspend for embracing Jews enthusiastically.

Historically as supported Palestinian’s over Israelis.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-65102128.amp

It's embarrassing how you won't just acknowledge you're still wrong and instead respond with some meaningless word salad.

Yes I was wrong as I said , I accept the version in the BBC news article I posted which I think is your take on it.

[Long slender neck]

Re: the Israeli airstrike story. This is a usually reliable account, sometimes relied upon by BBC Verify, potentially debunking the story. But yet many people will already have consumed the false narrative that Israel bombed fleeing civilians.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-67114281

Is the above link about a totally different explosion?

[Daily Express bot]

David Lammy has gone up in my estimations of him. He was on various media outlets recently and is saying Israel has the right to defend itself and Hamas are not the ordinary Palestinian people but are terrorists.

[Dunners]

Re: the Israeli airstrike story. This is a usually reliable account, sometimes relied upon by BBC Verify, potentially debunking the story. But yet many people will already have consumed the false narrative that Israel bombed fleeing civilians.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-67114281

Is the above link about a totally different explosion?

I'm not sure. Possibly, as I can't make out the trucks from the BBC Verify article in the footage above.

[Neptune's Spear]

Israel is planning to invade & annex Palestine in the next 7 days.

It breaks international law, is akin to a declaration of war & will start a new cycle of violence.

Hundreds, maybe thousands, of innocent people are going to die.

Evil & illegal barbarism!

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-53139808

Why don't you just come out and say that you're a supporter of Alois Shicklgruber Junior ?

[Tuffers#2]

Biden says hamas must be destroyed, Israel must not occupy gaza, Palestine must have authority , Palestine must be recognised as a state.