Russia / Ukraine Watch

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12349
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 989 times
Been thanked: 2813 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Max B Gold »

Dunners wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 7:13 pm Statement from Abramovitch on handing over control of Chelsea FC.

www.chelseafc.com/en/news/2022/02/26/st ... abramovich
Does he even own it? I thought Putin made him buy it as part of the bid to get Russia the World Cup and to smooth the path into wining and dining the London businessmen in the hospitality suites as the Petrogas roubles bought the London establishment.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9043
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1075 times
Been thanked: 2500 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Dunners »

Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:22 pm
Dunners wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:20 pm Things really seem to be happening. Kazakhstan and China are backing away, ejection from SWIFT is looking likely. And the Germans are finally doing the right thing.

All the above, combined with the incredible bravery and resistance of the Ukrainian people, and the news that the Chechen general may have been killed in action, gives us hope. Putin will not be happy.
An unhappy Putin might be even worse. Think further intimidation/provocation of other nations and increased missile bombardment of Ukraine
That is a concern. I'm sure military and FO strategists are looking at a range of possibilities, from offering him some form of optic victory so he can withdraw without losing face, to him being assassinated. But aggression is all he seems to respond to.
Mistadobalina
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2433
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 244 times
Been thanked: 1126 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Mistadobalina »

Dunners wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 12:31 pm The resolve to avoid any military contact between NATO and Russia is still strong. But we ain't seen the second attack wave yet. So far only about a third of Russian forces have crossed into Ukraine, and many of them seem to be bewildered conscripts from the Caucases.

The Russians are probing for weaknesses and will adapt. The second wave will include their elite forces and real heavy equipment, and will overcome some of the logistical errors made so far. We may even see the use of thermobaric weapons.

This will be tough to witness and could have an impact on public opinion and political appetite for intervention. Imagine the impact of tension of thousands of bodies littered through the street. So I get where Pammy is coming from.

So far we have been entirely reactive and have done so in a way that Putin could have entirely predicted. If NATO starts to believe an intervention is necessary then it will need to seize the initiative and be prepared to take real risks.
Is there a reason why Russia's invasion has been relatively muted so far? If they wanted to take Kiev and other major cities out, surely could have been done by now? Is it to minimise russian military losses or to reduce potential civilian losses so they can keep up their pretence of peacekeepers? Or is the Russian military really not invested in what they are being asked to do?

Having obviously planned this invasion for so long, it seems really odd that it's being done sporadically and in a way that allows ft or big losses of Russian troops.
Smendrick Feaselberg
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7326
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:32 pm
Has thanked: 1099 times
Been thanked: 1343 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Smendrick Feaselberg »

Dunners wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:27 pm
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:22 pm
Dunners wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:20 pm Things really seem to be happening. Kazakhstan and China are backing away, ejection from SWIFT is looking likely. And the Germans are finally doing the right thing.

All the above, combined with the incredible bravery and resistance of the Ukrainian people, and the news that the Chechen general may have been killed in action, gives us hope. Putin will not be happy.
An unhappy Putin might be even worse. Think further intimidation/provocation of other nations and increased missile bombardment of Ukraine
That is a concern. I'm sure military and FO strategists are looking at a range of possibilities, from offering him some form of optic victory so he can withdraw without losing face, to him being assassinated. But aggression is all he seems to respond to.
Since you know far more about this than me, why would bumping off Putin make things better as opposed to worse with his successor wanting/needing to avenge his death?
Smendrick Feaselberg
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7326
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:32 pm
Has thanked: 1099 times
Been thanked: 1343 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Smendrick Feaselberg »

Mistadobalina wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:30 pm
Dunners wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 12:31 pm The resolve to avoid any military contact between NATO and Russia is still strong. But we ain't seen the second attack wave yet. So far only about a third of Russian forces have crossed into Ukraine, and many of them seem to be bewildered conscripts from the Caucases.

The Russians are probing for weaknesses and will adapt. The second wave will include their elite forces and real heavy equipment, and will overcome some of the logistical errors made so far. We may even see the use of thermobaric weapons.

This will be tough to witness and could have an impact on public opinion and political appetite for intervention. Imagine the impact of tension of thousands of bodies littered through the street. So I get where Pammy is coming from.

So far we have been entirely reactive and have done so in a way that Putin could have entirely predicted. If NATO starts to believe an intervention is necessary then it will need to seize the initiative and be prepared to take real risks.
Is there a reason why Russia's invasion has been relatively muted so far? If they wanted to take Kiev and other major cities out, surely could have been done by now? Is it to minimise russian military losses or to reduce potential civilian losses so they can keep up their pretence of peacekeepers? Or is the Russian military really not invested in what they are being asked to do?

Having obviously planned this invasion for so long, it seems really odd that it's being done sporadically and in a way that allows ft or big losses of Russian troops.
From what I've read they've not sent in their most skilles troops yet. Presumably they sent in their grunts after the initial bombardments hoping that it would be enough to intimidate Ukraine into surrender/negotiations without losing their elite fighters.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9043
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1075 times
Been thanked: 2500 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Dunners »

Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:33 pm
Mistadobalina wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:30 pm
Dunners wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 12:31 pm The resolve to avoid any military contact between NATO and Russia is still strong. But we ain't seen the second attack wave yet. So far only about a third of Russian forces have crossed into Ukraine, and many of them seem to be bewildered conscripts from the Caucases.

The Russians are probing for weaknesses and will adapt. The second wave will include their elite forces and real heavy equipment, and will overcome some of the logistical errors made so far. We may even see the use of thermobaric weapons.

This will be tough to witness and could have an impact on public opinion and political appetite for intervention. Imagine the impact of tension of thousands of bodies littered through the street. So I get where Pammy is coming from.

So far we have been entirely reactive and have done so in a way that Putin could have entirely predicted. If NATO starts to believe an intervention is necessary then it will need to seize the initiative and be prepared to take real risks.
Is there a reason why Russia's invasion has been relatively muted so far? If they wanted to take Kiev and other major cities out, surely could have been done by now? Is it to minimise russian military losses or to reduce potential civilian losses so they can keep up their pretence of peacekeepers? Or is the Russian military really not invested in what they are being asked to do?

Having obviously planned this invasion for so long, it seems really odd that it's being done sporadically and in a way that allows ft or big losses of Russian troops.
From what I've read they've not sent in their most skilles troops yet. Presumably they sent in their grunts after the initial bombardments hoping that it would be enough to intimidate Ukraine into surrender/negotiations without losing their elite fighters.
This is what I'm reading, although there appears to be plenty of very poor logistical planning too. I also think the underestimated the resilience and resolve of the Ukrainians.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9043
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1075 times
Been thanked: 2500 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Dunners »

Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:30 pm
Dunners wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:27 pm
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:22 pm

An unhappy Putin might be even worse. Think further intimidation/provocation of other nations and increased missile bombardment of Ukraine
That is a concern. I'm sure military and FO strategists are looking at a range of possibilities, from offering him some form of optic victory so he can withdraw without losing face, to him being assassinated. But aggression is all he seems to respond to.
Since you know far more about this than me, why would bumping off Putin make things better as opposed to worse with his successor wanting/needing to avenge his death?
It's not guaranteed, but he has a very small circle of confidents and backers. And, seeing the fallout, it would give someone the opportunity to establish themselves as a reformer and bridge builder back to non-pariah status.
Stowaway
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1295
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:11 pm
Has thanked: 178 times
Been thanked: 418 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Stowaway »

Talking to a friend with a Russian partner tonight, he’s expressing amazement that Putin is ruining his legacy like this. To many Russians he was a hero, taking Russias economy and turning it around, even if you discount the fact that he and his pals then bled it dry. But this invasion is proving to be incredibly unpopular in Russia. There always have been close ties between the two countries and many Russians have relatives in Ukraine, and vice versa. For once RasPutin’s propaganda isn’t fooling the Russian people and there’s genuine outrage at this. He does value his legacy, and he’s risking going to his grave as the most despised man in history since Hitler. It just makes no sense at all.
Mistadobalina
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2433
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 244 times
Been thanked: 1126 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Mistadobalina »

Dunners wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:36 pm
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:33 pm
Mistadobalina wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:30 pm

Is there a reason why Russia's invasion has been relatively muted so far? If they wanted to take Kiev and other major cities out, surely could have been done by now? Is it to minimise russian military losses or to reduce potential civilian losses so they can keep up their pretence of peacekeepers? Or is the Russian military really not invested in what they are being asked to do?

Having obviously planned this invasion for so long, it seems really odd that it's being done sporadically and in a way that allows ft or big losses of Russian troops.
From what I've read they've not sent in their most skilles troops yet. Presumably they sent in their grunts after the initial bombardments hoping that it would be enough to intimidate Ukraine into surrender/negotiations without losing their elite fighters.
This is what I'm reading, although there appears to be plenty of very poor logistical planning too. I also think the underestimated the resilience and resolve of the Ukrainians.
Guess I don't really understand why they haven't used their total air dominance to level Ukraine's defences. And they've done enough indiscriminate bombing of civilian areas to eliminate any plausible deniability that this is an invasion to preserve the peace, but not so much as to start taking over major towns and cities.

There's not really a precedent for a 21st century conflict between two relatively advanced armies so it feels very surreal all round. But it just seems like if Russia had wanted this to be done comprehensively and quickly, they could have it done by now. Nothing has stopped them crossing borders, flooding the country with heavy equipment and encircling every city.

Without understanding how military tactics work, my assumption is that Ukraine is just delaying the inevitable for a few days and then it'll be on to insurgency tactics in the cities. That is unless cracks start to show in Russia domestically.
StockholmO
Fresh Alias
Posts: 497
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 6:48 pm
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by StockholmO »

I’m wary of the reports of how this conflict is going, but if the reports of Russian tactics are correct then it just doesn’t make any sense.

It could be that Putin is controlling this war himself and not his Generals.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

A Russian analyst view

User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12349
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 989 times
Been thanked: 2813 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Max B Gold »

Mistadobalina wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 10:02 pm
Dunners wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:36 pm
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:33 pm

From what I've read they've not sent in their most skilles troops yet. Presumably they sent in their grunts after the initial bombardments hoping that it would be enough to intimidate Ukraine into surrender/negotiations without losing their elite fighters.
This is what I'm reading, although there appears to be plenty of very poor logistical planning too. I also think the underestimated the resilience and resolve of the Ukrainians.
Guess I don't really understand why they haven't used their total air dominance to level Ukraine's defences. And they've done enough indiscriminate bombing of civilian areas to eliminate any plausible deniability that this is an invasion to preserve the peace, but not so much as to start taking over major towns and cities.

There's not really a precedent for a 21st century conflict between two relatively advanced armies so it feels very surreal all round. But it just seems like if Russia had wanted this to be done comprehensively and quickly, they could have it done by now. Nothing has stopped them crossing borders, flooding the country with heavy equipment and encircling every city.

Without understanding how military tactics work, my assumption is that Ukraine is just delaying the inevitable for a few days and then it'll be on to insurgency tactics in the cities. That is unless cracks start to show in Russia domestically.
It's a big country. Let them in and run down their materiel. Defend the cities, street by street. They will pay the cost. Besides the Russian military despite the rebuild with Petrogas Dollars isn't all its cracked up to be.

Expect battlefield nukes next week.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

Expect Battlefield Nukes ?
Where Maxy ?
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9043
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1075 times
Been thanked: 2500 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Dunners »

Things are escalating and tensions are rising. Chechen forces want to go full jihadi, and Russia now sending in the elite forces and weaponry with instructions to go in hard.

Putin has just put his nuclear deterrence on a state of high alert. That will affect the DEFCOM status. I'm definitely feeling more uneasy.
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12349
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 989 times
Been thanked: 2813 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Max B Gold »

tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 1:14 pm Expect Battlefield Nukes ?
Where Maxy ?
Battlefield
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

Max B Gold wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 1:57 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 1:14 pm Expect Battlefield Nukes ?
Where Maxy ?
Battlefield
Id be more worried about Putin readying his Nukes against
European leaders/Nations who he says are threatening Russia .

Which he has done within the last hour
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12349
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 989 times
Been thanked: 2813 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Max B Gold »

tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:07 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 1:57 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 1:14 pm Expect Battlefield Nukes ?
Where Maxy ?
Battlefield
Id be more worried about Putin readying his Nukes against
European leaders/Nations who he says are threatening Russia .

Which he has done within the last hour
UK should be OK then. The Tories are bought and paid for mates of Mad Vlad.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

Max B Gold wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:20 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:07 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 1:57 pm

Battlefield
Id be more worried about Putin readying his Nukes against
European leaders/Nations who he says are threatening Russia .

Which he has done within the last hour
UK should be OK then. The Tories are bought and paid for mates of Mad Vlad.
Do they own the american air force bases & nukes
On the British mainland as well ?
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12349
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 989 times
Been thanked: 2813 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Max B Gold »

tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:23 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:20 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:07 pm

Id be more worried about Putin readying his Nukes against
European leaders/Nations who he says are threatening Russia .

Which he has done within the last hour
UK should be OK then. The Tories are bought and paid for mates of Mad Vlad.
Do they own the american air force bases & nukes
On the British mainland as well ?
All UK nuclear missile bearing submarines are at sea and in position.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12502
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2555 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:07 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 1:57 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 1:14 pm Expect Battlefield Nukes ?
Where Maxy ?
Battlefield
Id be more worried about Putin readying his Nukes against
European leaders/Nations who he says are threatening Russia .

Which he has done within the last hour
If he's mad enough to use them he can kiss Russia good-bye. He might be happy to see Russia destroyed but what about his people. No winners only losers.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

Max B Gold wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:37 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:23 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:20 pm

UK should be OK then. The Tories are bought and paid for mates of Mad Vlad.
Do they own the american air force bases & nukes
On the British mainland as well ?
All UK nuclear missile bearing submarines are at sea and in position.
Iasked about air bases, does the uk only have submarine nukes? im not upto date on the uks american arsenal .
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by tuffers#1 »

RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 3:21 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:07 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 1:57 pm

Battlefield
Id be more worried about Putin readying his Nukes against
European leaders/Nations who he says are threatening Russia .

Which he has done within the last hour
If he's mad enough to use them he can kiss Russia good-bye. He might be happy to see Russia destroyed but what about his people. No winners only losers.
surely you arent asking if hes mad enough are you ?
User avatar
Top of the JES
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3648
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:38 pm
Has thanked: 1249 times
Been thanked: 1253 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by Top of the JES »

The best we can hope for is some sort of negotiated compromise to allow Putins to save face.

Not particularly worried about Putins nuclear threats Russia and NATO are always on alert. Heightened alert is word play and he Absolutely knows that any attack on NATO countries would be met with similar force and that’s the end for mother Russia as well as the rest of us. even Putin won’t do that.

As mentioned earlier Putin has a small circle of confidants he has been largely isolated over the last few years and The Russian people are against this invasion those two things could spell the end for Putin it only takes a couple of high ranking armed forces majors to put their heads together to be able to force Putin out or take him out.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12502
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2555 times

Re: Russia / Ukraine Watch

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 3:25 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 3:21 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:07 pm

Id be more worried about Putin readying his Nukes against
European leaders/Nations who he says are threatening Russia .

Which he has done within the last hour
If he's mad enough to use them he can kiss Russia good-bye. He might be happy to see Russia destroyed but what about his people. No winners only losers.
surely you arent asking if hes mad enough are you ?
Yes, fair point .
Post Reply