Page 1 of 1

Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 9:05 am
by Tent Keague
Two votes allowed per user

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 10:39 am
by gshaw
Depressingly had to vote Brophy for LB as with our other two RBs having no attacking threat it's the only way we get any forward movement. Also wanted to vote Turley for RB but he's our only CB with any pace /facepalm

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 10:57 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Brophy can only fit into a 4-3-3 as a full back.

If we’re playing that formation properly, he’s actually ideal for the role.

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 11:03 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
RedO wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 10:57 am Brophy can only fit into a 4-3-3 as a full back.

If we’re playing that formation properly, he’s actually ideal for the role.
I think I have a fundamentally different view of how that formation works. If you have 3 forwards, and at least one attacking midfielder, you don’t really need an attacking fullback, do you?

Looking at the potential lineups, having 6 players attacking the opposition box seems like it will leave numerous holes. And it’s not like we have tons of pace back that if brophys attacking. Will get done on the counter numerous times imo

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 4:36 pm
by Millennial Snowflake
Apple Wumble wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 11:03 am
RedO wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 10:57 am Brophy can only fit into a 4-3-3 as a full back.

If we’re playing that formation properly, he’s actually ideal for the role.
I think I have a fundamentally different view of how that formation works. If you have 3 forwards, and at least one attacking midfielder, you don’t really need an attacking fullback, do you?
Liverpool?

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 4:40 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Millennial Snowflake wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 4:36 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 11:03 am
RedO wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 10:57 am Brophy can only fit into a 4-3-3 as a full back.

If we’re playing that formation properly, he’s actually ideal for the role.
I think I have a fundamentally different view of how that formation works. If you have 3 forwards, and at least one attacking midfielder, you don’t really need an attacking fullback, do you?
Liverpool?
I meant when you have sh*t players :lol:

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 5:12 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
I’ve gone with Judd simply because he’s better than Ling and Widdowson because I think Brophy is more affective on the wing

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 6:14 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 5:12 pm I’ve gone with Judd simply because he’s better than Ling and Widdowson because I think Brophy is more affective on the wing
But we don’t play with wingers.

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 6:16 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Millennial Snowflake wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 4:36 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 11:03 am
RedO wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 10:57 am Brophy can only fit into a 4-3-3 as a full back.

If we’re playing that formation properly, he’s actually ideal for the role.
I think I have a fundamentally different view of how that formation works. If you have 3 forwards, and at least one attacking midfielder, you don’t really need an attacking fullback, do you?
Liverpool?
This.

The big clubs play with the front 3 really narrow and it’s up to the full backs to provide the width. They need to be quick, athletic and offensive, Brophy is ideal.

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 6:18 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Fairs. We’ll see.

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 6:24 pm
by tuffers#1
Apple Wumble wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 4:40 pm
Millennial Snowflake wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 4:36 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 11:03 am
I think I have a fundamentally different view of how that formation works. If you have 3 forwards, and at least one attacking midfielder, you don’t really need an attacking fullback, do you?
Liverpool?
I meant when you have sh*t players :lol:
But in League 2 our opponents have sh*t players as well

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 9:36 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Apple Wumble wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2020 6:18 pm Fairs. We’ll see.
Although the way we play it, with a central lone striker and two quasi wingers, kind of negates the need for this type of full back.

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 4:28 pm
by KC & sunshine band
phil hoadley and dennis rofe

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 8:52 pm
by Mike pinner
George Marsh and Charlie Daniels

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 10:33 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
As I read this now, there have been 84 votes, so 42 for left back, of which 19 have opted for Brophy, 19 for Widdowson and 3 for Ogie.

Which means someone has gone for Ling, Judd or Turley there.

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 10:39 pm
by Sid Bishop
Mike pinner wrote: Sun Aug 30, 2020 8:52 pm George Marsh and Charlie Daniels
You are having a laugh............surely ?
Of all the excellent right backs we have had play for us......... you pick George Marsh, a young player who is not even a Leyton Orient player, strange choice indeed ?

Re: Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 10:39 pm
by Sid Bishop
KC & sunshine band wrote: Sun Aug 30, 2020 4:28 pm phil hoadley and dennis rofe
Oh yes, now we are talking !