Vote for your full backs in a 433 formation

[Tent Keague]

Two votes allowed per user

[gshaw]

Depressingly had to vote Brophy for LB as with our other two RBs having no attacking threat it's the only way we get any forward movement. Also wanted to vote Turley for RB but he's our only CB with any pace /facepalm

[Ronnie Hotdogs]

Brophy can only fit into a 4-3-3 as a full back.

If we’re playing that formation properly, he’s actually ideal for the role.

[Rich Tea Wellin]

Brophy can only fit into a 4-3-3 as a full back.

If we’re playing that formation properly, he’s actually ideal for the role.

I think I have a fundamentally different view of how that formation works. If you have 3 forwards, and at least one attacking midfielder, you don’t really need an attacking fullback, do you?

Looking at the potential lineups, having 6 players attacking the opposition box seems like it will leave numerous holes. And it’s not like we have tons of pace back that if brophys attacking. Will get done on the counter numerous times imo

[Millennial Snowflake]

Brophy can only fit into a 4-3-3 as a full back.

If we’re playing that formation properly, he’s actually ideal for the role.

I think I have a fundamentally different view of how that formation works. If you have 3 forwards, and at least one attacking midfielder, you don’t really need an attacking fullback, do you?

Liverpool?

[Rich Tea Wellin]

Brophy can only fit into a 4-3-3 as a full back.

If we’re playing that formation properly, he’s actually ideal for the role.

I think I have a fundamentally different view of how that formation works. If you have 3 forwards, and at least one attacking midfielder, you don’t really need an attacking fullback, do you?

Liverpool?

I meant when you have sh*t players

[RedDwarf 1881]

I’ve gone with Judd simply because he’s better than Ling and Widdowson because I think Brophy is more affective on the wing

[Ronnie Hotdogs]

I’ve gone with Judd simply because he’s better than Ling and Widdowson because I think Brophy is more affective on the wing

But we don’t play with wingers.

[Ronnie Hotdogs]

Brophy can only fit into a 4-3-3 as a full back.

If we’re playing that formation properly, he’s actually ideal for the role.

I think I have a fundamentally different view of how that formation works. If you have 3 forwards, and at least one attacking midfielder, you don’t really need an attacking fullback, do you?

Liverpool?

This.

The big clubs play with the front 3 really narrow and it’s up to the full backs to provide the width. They need to be quick, athletic and offensive, Brophy is ideal.

[Rich Tea Wellin]

Fairs. We’ll see.

[tuffers#1]

I think I have a fundamentally different view of how that formation works. If you have 3 forwards, and at least one attacking midfielder, you don’t really need an attacking fullback, do you?

Liverpool?

I meant when you have sh*t players

But in League 2 our opponents have sh*t players as well

[Ronnie Hotdogs]

Fairs. We’ll see.

Although the way we play it, with a central lone striker and two quasi wingers, kind of negates the need for this type of full back.

[KC & sunshine band]

phil hoadley and dennis rofe

[Mike pinner]

George Marsh and Charlie Daniels

[Ronnie Hotdogs]

As I read this now, there have been 84 votes, so 42 for left back, of which 19 have opted for Brophy, 19 for Widdowson and 3 for Ogie.

Which means someone has gone for Ling, Judd or Turley there.

[Sid Bishop]

George Marsh and Charlie Daniels

You are having a laugh............surely ?
Of all the excellent right backs we have had play for us......... you pick George Marsh, a young player who is not even a Leyton Orient player, strange choice indeed ?

[Sid Bishop]

phil hoadley and dennis rofe

Oh yes, now we are talking !