Martin Ditherling
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:28 pm
Over 2 weeks since Ross stepped down
The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
He’s only had 4 months to pick a long term shortlist
A shortlist is only a small part of the process flow. Nor has it been over two weeks since Embleton stood down as you claim in your opening post.
I'd rather have Adams than Currie , then again I'd rather have Chinese than a Currie .Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 3:55 pmA shortlist is only a small part of the process flow. Nor has it been over two weeks since Embleton stood down as you claim in your opening post.
No? It was announced on the 23rd Sep. It’s now the 10th October. So, over 2 weeks.Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 3:55 pmA shortlist is only a small part of the process flow. Nor has it been over two weeks since Embleton stood down as you claim in your opening post.
Fair dos. i messed my weeks up so I'll put my hands up to that error.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:40 pmNo? It was announced on the 23rd Sep. It’s now the 10th October. So, over 2 weeks.Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 3:55 pmA shortlist is only a small part of the process flow. Nor has it been over two weeks since Embleton stood down as you claim in your opening post.
Of course. Which is why it’s so frustrating. After appointing an interim manager 4 months ago, this shouldn’t have taken longer than a weekSmendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:50 pmFair dos. i messed my weeks up so I'll put my hands up to that error.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:40 pmNo? It was announced on the 23rd Sep. It’s now the 10th October. So, over 2 weeks.Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 3:55 pm
A shortlist is only a small part of the process flow. Nor has it been over two weeks since Embleton stood down as you claim in your opening post.
Do you understand the stages in the process flow for a new appointment though?
I dare say Ling knew it was a real probability before the announcement too. But still not dithering, just doing due diligence before making a decision. I’m sure he will get it right and it will be worth the wait.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:40 pmNo? It was announced on the 23rd Sep. It’s now the 10th October. So, over 2 weeks.Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 3:55 pmA shortlist is only a small part of the process flow. Nor has it been over two weeks since Embleton stood down as you claim in your opening post.
Absolute rubbish, it was thought by Martin Ling that Ross could do the manager's job. He has admitted that he is a coach and not a manager so we started to look for his replacement. If we appointed a manager after a week of searching and interviews and he was a failure, you would be the first to complain.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:52 pmOf course. Which is why it’s so frustrating. After appointing an interim manager 4 months ago, this shouldn’t have taken longer than a weekSmendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:50 pmFair dos. i messed my weeks up so I'll put my hands up to that error.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:40 pm
No? It was announced on the 23rd Sep. It’s now the 10th October. So, over 2 weeks.
Do you understand the stages in the process flow for a new appointment though?
Both clubs have probably been trying to get the same person.Scuba Diver wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 5:29 pmSol Campbell about to be name as SUFC manager 'by all accounts'
If he thought he was suitable long term, he needs sacking asapLovejoy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:58 pmAbsolute rubbish, it was thought by Martin Ling that Ross could do the manager's job. He has admitted that he is a coach and not a manager so we started to look for his replacement. If we appointed a manager after a week of searching and interviews and he was a failure, you would be the first to complain.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:52 pmOf course. Which is why it’s so frustrating. After appointing an interim manager 4 months ago, this shouldn’t have taken longer than a weekSmendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:50 pm
Fair dos. i messed my weeks up so I'll put my hands up to that error.
Do you understand the stages in the process flow for a new appointment though?
Yeah, and what?
I don't understand the stages. Could you explain them to me?BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:52 pmOf course. Which is why it’s so frustrating. After appointing an interim manager 4 months ago, this shouldn’t have taken longer than a weekSmendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:50 pmFair dos. i messed my weeks up so I'll put my hands up to that error.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:40 pm
No? It was announced on the 23rd Sep. It’s now the 10th October. So, over 2 weeks.
Do you understand the stages in the process flow for a new appointment though?
You clearly don't understand because you're giving too much weight to an early stage and fast turnaround part of the process flow. That's ignoring your "had four months to do this" comments which have been debunked many times.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:52 pmOf course. Which is why it’s so frustrating. After appointing an interim manager 4 months ago, this shouldn’t have taken longer than a weekSmendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:50 pmFair dos. i messed my weeks up so I'll put my hands up to that error.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:40 pm
No? It was announced on the 23rd Sep. It’s now the 10th October. So, over 2 weeks.
Do you understand the stages in the process flow for a new appointment though?