Supreme Court Hearing

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12913
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 1067 times
Been thanked: 2914 times

Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Max B Gold »

Watching it live on the BBC. It's a bit dry but the side seeking the restoration of democracy appear to be winning. No sign of Spen anywhere.
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14812
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2593 times
Been thanked: 3416 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Long slender neck »

Any chance BREXSHIT could be confined to a single thread?
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12913
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 1067 times
Been thanked: 2914 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Max B Gold »

Nothing to do with Brexit. You IMBECILE.
spen666
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3357
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 1163 times
Been thanked: 496 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by spen666 »

QED

Doesnt take long does it?
User avatar
ComeOnYouOs
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3841
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:22 pm
Awards: Colossal berk
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by ComeOnYouOs »

If they find against Johnson, will he have to resign, for misleading the Queen?
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14812
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2593 times
Been thanked: 3416 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Long slender neck »

No
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12913
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 1067 times
Been thanked: 2914 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Max B Gold »

Mother of parliaments shut down by father of lies', QC tells court in jibe at Boris Johnson 
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Disoriented »

Max B Gold wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:05 pm Mother of parliaments shut down by father of lies', QC tells court in jibe at Boris Johnson 
Quite right too, although I enjoyed much more the impassioned savaging Johnson received from a father at Whipps Cross today.

Showed the clown up yet again for the liar he is.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by tuffers#1 »

Disoriented wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 10:11 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:05 pm Mother of parliaments shut down by father of lies', QC tells court in jibe at Boris Johnson 
Quite right too, although I enjoyed much more the impassioned savaging Johnson received from a father at Whipps Cross today.

Showed the clown up yet again for the liar he is.
Shame he was a Labour activist & not just a random Dad

Still prefer the

" Leave my town bloke "

Pure Class.
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Disoriented »

tuffers#1 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 10:21 pm
Disoriented wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 10:11 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:05 pm Mother of parliaments shut down by father of lies', QC tells court in jibe at Boris Johnson 
Quite right too, although I enjoyed much more the impassioned savaging Johnson received from a father at Whipps Cross today.

Showed the clown up yet again for the liar he is.
Shame he was a Labour activist & not just a random Dad

Still prefer the

" Leave my town bloke "

Pure Class.
The fella was there in his capacity as a father. He was perfectly entitled to tell Johnson of his experience at Whipps. The clown saying there was no press there was laughable?
Captain Zep
Fresh Alias
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:17 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Captain Zep »

See Laura K organising a pile on on the bloke on Twitter. Classy.
User avatar
ComeOnYouOs
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3841
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:22 pm
Awards: Colossal berk
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by ComeOnYouOs »

Captain Zep wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 8:22 am See Laura K organising a pile on on the bloke on Twitter. Classy.
I expect nothing less from Laura. Totally biased journo
User avatar
StillSpike
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4330
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 pm
Has thanked: 536 times
Been thanked: 1259 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by StillSpike »

ComeOnYouOs wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 9:53 am
Captain Zep wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 8:22 am See Laura K organising a pile on on the bloke on Twitter. Classy.
I expect nothing less from Laura. Totally biased journo
But it's done the job, hasn't it. All the useful idiots have picked up the ball and are running with it. "He's a labour activist, don't you know?" is the story - or the pile on itself, or Laura. Not the NHS underfunding, and most certainly not the fact that our Prime Minister's first reaction to being challenged was an out-and-out lie. Right there, right in front of the press, he lied. He's playing us all for mugs - he knows he can just say the first untruth that comes into his head, and get away with it. The contempt he has for us is palpable.

Back to the thread subject, though - there is a connection. It's clear why there's no affidavit from Johnson on the prorogation - he (or his advisor) knows that if he appears in the Supreme Court, he'll lie - it's in his nature to lie - and he'll be caught in the lie, and, unlike the media, the Court would hold him to account for lying - an perjury does carry some fairly stiff repercussions.
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14812
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2593 times
Been thanked: 3416 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Long slender neck »

Is it not a journalists job to point out these facts?
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:18 am Is it not a journalists job to point out these facts?
That the NHS is chronically underfunded? Absolutely. But Laura Kuntsberg doesn't seem to be interested in that.
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14812
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2593 times
Been thanked: 3416 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Long slender neck »

Childish.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Totally agree. I've no idea how she's landed that job.
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12913
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 1067 times
Been thanked: 2914 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Max B Gold »

StillSpike wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:03 am
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 9:53 am
Captain Zep wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 8:22 am See Laura K organising a pile on on the bloke on Twitter. Classy.
I expect nothing less from Laura. Totally biased journo
But it's done the job, hasn't it. All the useful idiots have picked up the ball and are running with it. "He's a labour activist, don't you know?" is the story - or the pile on itself, or Laura. Not the NHS underfunding, and most certainly not the fact that our Prime Minister's first reaction to being challenged was an out-and-out lie. Right there, right in front of the press, he lied. He's playing us all for mugs - he knows he can just say the first untruth that comes into his head, and get away with it. The contempt he has for us is palpable.

Back to the thread subject, though - there is a connection. It's clear why there's no affidavit from Johnson on the prorogation - he (or his advisor) knows that if he appears in the Supreme Court, he'll lie - it's in his nature to lie - and he'll be caught in the lie, and, unlike the media, the Court would hold him to account for lying - an perjury does carry some fairly stiff repercussions.
Correct. Especially the bit about not providing a witness stastement to the SC.

He can't put in writing his claim that proroging parliament was to enable him to prepare and present his legislative programme because that's not the reason. There will be too much evidence floating around that could come out and contradict him that he dare not lie in writing.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by tuffers#1 »

Disoriented wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 6:13 am
tuffers#1 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 10:21 pm
Disoriented wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 10:11 pm

Quite right too, although I enjoyed much more the impassioned savaging Johnson received from a father at Whipps Cross today.

Showed the clown up yet again for the liar he is.
Shame he was a Labour activist & not just a random Dad

Still prefer the

" Leave my town bloke "

Pure Class.
The fella was there in his capacity as a father. He was perfectly entitled to tell Johnson of his experience at Whipps. The clown saying there was no press there was laughable?
I dont dis agree (😁) , just wish he wasnt an activist as the brexshitters are already saying blah blah blah labour activist.
Still's Carenae
Fresh Alias
Posts: 787
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:49 am
Has thanked: 36 times
Been thanked: 107 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Still's Carenae »

I like the way John Major is against the proroging. He did this for cash for questions, to prevent it being discussed.

Pot calling the kettle black i think.

Or is it just the establishment against the people.
LittleMate
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3303
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:03 pm
Has thanked: 1732 times
Been thanked: 938 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by LittleMate »

tuffers#1 wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 12:05 pm
Disoriented wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 6:13 am
tuffers#1 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 10:21 pm

Shame he was a Labour activist & not just a random Dad

Still prefer the

" Leave my town bloke "

Pure Class.
The fella was there in his capacity as a father. He was perfectly entitled to tell Johnson of his experience at Whipps. The clown saying there was no press there was laughable?
I dont dis agree (😁) , just wish he wasnt an activist as the brexshitters are already saying blah blah blah labour activist.
Firstly, I don't feel I have a political bias. If anything I'm a tad conservative (small c) in my views. So,

The bloke who pulled him up was a dad who happened to be an activist. It was always going to be someone like him pulling Boris up because Tory supporters would not.

I think the press denial shows Boris off perfectly. He blatantly lies into the face of the camera's he'd denying. Ignore any personal bias - how can anyone possibly trust anyone who would lie in such a blatant manner? This man is being charged with my kids - and possibly my kids kids future with the Brexit decision. Unbelieveable.....
Flying Hippo
Fresh Alias
Posts: 77
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:25 pm
Been thanked: 29 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Flying Hippo »

RedO wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:23 am
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:18 am Is it not a journalists job to point out these facts?
That the NHS is chronically underfunded? Absolutely. But Laura Kuntsberg doesn't seem to be interested in that.
The attack on the reporter (insulted above) is typical of the new Labour Party's strategy: Assault the journalist who criticises Corbyn/the Party pour encourager les autres.

It seems to be received wisdom that the NHS is chronically underfunded. How much, in Sterling, would be acceptable to those who repeat this claim? (And rather than stretch this absurdity out any longer than necessary, the NHS in England alone is currently funded to the tune of £134,000,000,000 this financial year - with much more coming, ridiculously, just to feed this grotesque national shibboleth. That's a daily cost of around £368.1 MILLION each day.

We will then proceed on to:

- the murder/recklessness/carelessness by a minority of its staff;
- the disproportionate ratio and salaries of administrative staff to operational staff (and on the first point: no, the hotel industry is not an acceptable comparator, HM Prison Service is a much better example of a organisation with a comparably specific operational focus. And on the second point, the chief executive of Whipps X earns twice as much as the Prime Minister and really ought to have been the person to whom Mr Salem addressed his wroth);
- health tourism and its effects (everyone knows the arguments and thinks they know the costs until the gallant cry of "racism" halts any further consideration of the point);
- foreign staff (where the absence of their skills in their home countries is very much to their own countries' detriment);
- how the "world class NHS" is no such thing and ranks mid table, at best, in international comparisons;
- how the Labour Party has already sold off the NHS with its obscene PFI Programme, and
- how much of the traditional notion of a national health service has been cut adrift, resulting, for example, in the disgusting treatment of the "Olds" as Jezza's disciples commonly refer to anyone over 60, except H-Block McConnell and the septuagenarian Glorious Leader himself of course.
User avatar
StillSpike
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4330
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 pm
Has thanked: 536 times
Been thanked: 1259 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by StillSpike »

And again, the blatant lie, by our supposed Prime Minister, to the man's face - on camera, in front of the press he's denying are there - is NOT the story.

You see how these things work?
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12913
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 1067 times
Been thanked: 2914 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Max B Gold »

Still's Carenae wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 1:31 pm I like the way John Major is against the proroging. He did this for cash for questions, to prevent it being discussed.

Pot calling the kettle black i think.

Or is it just the establishment against the people.
My reply to the Major point is - So what.

Is it the establishment against the people? - you bet, the Old Etonian cabal are denying the peoples democratically elected representatives a voice in parliament.
Real Al
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2306
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:49 pm
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 446 times

Re: Supreme Court Hearing

Post by Real Al »

ComeOnYouOs wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 9:53 am
Captain Zep wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 8:22 am See Laura K organising a pile on on the bloke on Twitter. Classy.
I expect nothing less from Laura. Totally biased journo
Can a boarder be banned for being a total fecking idiot?

Asking for a friend.
Post Reply