The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
Not one that resulted in a prison sentence.
What makes you think that "it's something about him" that i feel he may be guilty? I hope he's not, but at the moment it's not looking hopeful.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 9:38 pmYou seem to think Marvin is guilty?Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 7:09 pmIt doesn't take too much these days for some young people to lose their rag.Millennial Snowflake wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 5:13 pm
This. Most people don’t put someone in a headlock without some kind of provocation. Sounds like the other bloke ran his mouth one too many times and is now crying about it. Grass gets mown
What is it about him that leads you to believe that?
Mum would no doubt fall asleep ...........she snores for EnglanddOh Nut wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 11:42 pmJeez, I’ve been to the cinema and theatre and sporting events with my kids and grand kids. Always thought it to be a healthy part of family life. So I’m wrong in taking my young grandson to football or to the cinema during school holidays. Really.BIGRON wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 11:25 pmI take my 90 year old mum to the hospital once a fortnight for her blood tests , i also take her shopping once a week , i draw the line at going go the flicks with her thoughclaptonCasual wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 8:01 pm
What's "all sorts of wrong" about going to the pictures with your mum?
Schoolboy stuff, being schooled in Hackney and Stepney a fairly common occurrence. Thereafter in a dojo where I regularly came out second best and bowed in respect to the guy who kicked (literally) my arse (or head). The only time police were involved is if they were my opponent. Kiai.
Based on what?Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 12:09 amWhat makes you think that "it's something about him" that i feel he may be guilty? I hope he's not, but at the moment it's not looking hopeful.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 9:38 pmYou seem to think Marvin is guilty?Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 7:09 pm
It doesn't take too much these days for some young people to lose their rag.
What is it about him that leads you to believe that?
Most likely outcome. Unless there are independent witnesses it’s one persons word against another. CCTV is OK even if available but don’t record what was said so provocation will be missed. Non-story. Let the authorities deal with it and wait and see the outcome.eagwgw wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:57 am It's a fair point.
Darius Henderson had a trial before joining us, was found not guilty and the circumstances seemed much more damning for him.
Getting someone in a headlock is a bit of a defensive measure, kind of suggesting the other guy might have thrown the first punch and missed.
I actually think it'll come to nothing.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... inues.htmlCreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 11:05 am Don't remember what he did but I'd believe it if it was him involved.
I know this is probably a wum, but its getting a bit embarrassing and sounds like victim blaming.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:02 pm https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sport ... DjrH43CGY4
Mail have clearly already made their mind up.
This bloke sounds like a joke - never mind being taken to the cinema by his mum, he's now giving evidence from behind a screen and has admitted to screaming when Marv put him in a headlock.
Obviously a bit tongue in cheek but come on, giving evidence from behind a f*cking screen? He's not testifying against the mafia.Red_Army wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:36 pmI know this is probably a wum, but its getting a bit embarrassing and sounds like victim blaming.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:02 pm https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sport ... DjrH43CGY4
Mail have clearly already made their mind up.
This bloke sounds like a joke - never mind being taken to the cinema by his mum, he's now giving evidence from behind a screen and has admitted to screaming when Marv put him in a headlock.
CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:44 pmObviously a bit tongue in cheek but come on, giving evidence from behind a f*** screen? He's not testifying against the mafia.Red_Army wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:36 pmI know this is probably a wum, but its getting a bit embarrassing and sounds like victim blaming.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:02 pm https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sport ... DjrH43CGY4
Mail have clearly already made their mind up.
This bloke sounds like a joke - never mind being taken to the cinema by his mum, he's now giving evidence from behind a screen and has admitted to screaming when Marv put him in a headlock.
I don’t need anything else. I've formed an opinion on what I've read.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:23 am Because you've got nothing else to form an opinion on.
Given we weren't there and are not privy to the evidence so far, I've formed my opinion that this seems pretty unlikely from how he's conducted himself, on and off the pitch, over the past 18 months or whatever it's been. Nothing from that would indicate he is the sort to go around getting into rows and lumping people for no good reason.
What is that you've read on your news feed that makes you think he's guilty?
Plenty. They don't call me mad Micky Mullins for nothing.
What bit of what you’ve read?Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:00 pmI don’t need anything else. I've formed an opinion on what I've read.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:23 am Because you've got nothing else to form an opinion on.
Given we weren't there and are not privy to the evidence so far, I've formed my opinion that this seems pretty unlikely from how he's conducted himself, on and off the pitch, over the past 18 months or whatever it's been. Nothing from that would indicate he is the sort to go around getting into rows and lumping people for no good reason.
What is that you've read on your news feed that makes you think he's guilty?
What makes you think "there's something about him" that brings me to this opinion?
He's the alleged victim in an assault case. If he wants to avoid the man he alleges attacked him, he is entitled to that.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:44 pmObviously a bit tongue in cheek but come on, giving evidence from behind a f*** screen? He's not testifying against the mafia.Red_Army wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:36 pmI know this is probably a wum, but its getting a bit embarrassing and sounds like victim blaming.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:02 pm https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sport ... DjrH43CGY4
Mail have clearly already made their mind up.
This bloke sounds like a joke - never mind being taken to the cinema by his mum, he's now giving evidence from behind a screen and has admitted to screaming when Marv put him in a headlock.
Sh1tebagRed_Army wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:25 pmHe's the alleged victim in an assault case. If he wants to avoid the man he alleges attacked him, he is entitled to that.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:44 pmObviously a bit tongue in cheek but come on, giving evidence from behind a f*** screen? He's not testifying against the mafia.
Okay.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:32 pmSh1tebagRed_Army wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:25 pmHe's the alleged victim in an assault case. If he wants to avoid the man he alleges attacked him, he is entitled to that.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:44 pm
Obviously a bit tongue in cheek but come on, giving evidence from behind a f*** screen? He's not testifying against the mafia.
I understand there are significant differences between English law and Scottish Law. Perhaps that’s what they use up there?Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:32 pmSh1tebagRed_Army wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:25 pmHe's the alleged victim in an assault case. If he wants to avoid the man he alleges attacked him, he is entitled to that.CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:44 pm
Obviously a bit tongue in cheek but come on, giving evidence from behind a f*** screen? He's not testifying against the mafia.