Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
Moderator: Long slender neck
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend

- Posts: 16651
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 7224 times
- Been thanked: 5672 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
Thought Morris was back to almost his best today. Made good decisions, committed and aggressiveHoover Attack wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:16 pmThought Morris did ok to limit his output.CharlieO wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:03 pmFor those not at the game, Bowyer was booked for diving in the Orient penalty box in the first half, and accordingly booed every time he got the ball after that. Was indeed the best player on the pitch first half though.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 7:24 pm
I'm very pleased with the 3 points but I have to agree Blackpool did look the better side . In my opinion their number 11 , Josh Bowyer looked the best player on the pitch . Does anybody know why every time Bowyer touched the ball our fans were booing him . I'm just curious, do we have any history with this player .Also I think the way we were set up today made us harder to break down but somewhat nullified our attacking threat . We've played better this season at home and lost so all I care about is we won . Also I thought Akhamrich and Kabia looked poor today and didn't really influence the game . However I thought Dobra and Wellens looked good when they came on .
-
E10quence
- Tiresome troll

- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2026 5:04 pm
- Has thanked: 629 times
- Been thanked: 667 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
Agree, thought he looked up for it, and seemed much more comfortable getting forward than Fin was on the other side.Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 9:07 pmThought Morris was back to almost his best today. Made good decisions, committed and aggressiveHoover Attack wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:16 pmThought Morris did ok to limit his output.CharlieO wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:03 pm
For those not at the game, Bowyer was booked for diving in the Orient penalty box in the first half, and accordingly booed every time he got the ball after that. Was indeed the best player on the pitch first half though.
If we're going to continue with five at the back, we will need both to provide the width we lacked in attack.
(I'm a poet and I didn't know it)
-
AlphabetKing
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2026 5:13 pm
- Location: Paris
- Has thanked: 426 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
I agree. Great to see him back in the fold, and playing like we saw him last season.Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 9:07 pmThought Morris was back to almost his best today. Made good decisions, committed and aggressiveHoover Attack wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:16 pmThought Morris did ok to limit his output.CharlieO wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:03 pm
For those not at the game, Bowyer was booked for diving in the Orient penalty box in the first half, and accordingly booed every time he got the ball after that. Was indeed the best player on the pitch first half though.
- Top of the JES
- Regular

- Posts: 4275
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 1489 times
- Been thanked: 1537 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
If that's how you saw it fine, we saw it differently. Connolly was wide in the first half Yusuf was too to start with but ineffective and got pulled inside midway through the first half, Yusuf and Connolly are never going to double up with our full backs no matter what the formation.Hoover Attack wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:14 pmWrong analysis.Top of the JES wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 4:03 pm Playing "wing backs" and two wide players in front of them does not work, it just leaves a lack of bodies and a hole in central midfield. Blackpool have put in two or three great crosses and we are surviving at the moment.
We played with wing backs, both Yusuf and Alan played narrow. Those crosses came in because they were overloading the wide areas (because we didn't have wingers supporting the wing backs).
We did at least try to put Yusuf out wide by inverting Stevens after a bit in the first half.
- Bandy Legs
- Boardin' 24/7

- Posts: 8455
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:37 pm
- Has thanked: 2858 times
- Been thanked: 1216 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
As Dave Victor saidTop of the JES wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 9:24 pmIf that's how you saw it fine, we saw it differently. Connolly was wide in the first half Yusuf was too to start with but ineffective and got pulled inside midway through the first half, Yusuf and Connolly are never going to double up with our full backs no matter what the formation.Hoover Attack wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:14 pmWrong analysis.Top of the JES wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 4:03 pm Playing "wing backs" and two wide players in front of them does not work, it just leaves a lack of bodies and a hole in central midfield. Blackpool have put in two or three great crosses and we are surviving at the moment.
We played with wing backs, both Yusuf and Alan played narrow. Those crosses came in because they were overloading the wide areas (because we didn't have wingers supporting the wing backs).
We did at least try to put Yusuf out wide by inverting Stevens after a bit in the first half.
Connolly is Hugging the touchline !
Stop arguing with Vacuum.
He's Clueless & talks nonsense numbers
Like he's Gary bloody Neville
-
RedDwarf 1881
- MB Legend

- Posts: 16360
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 3462 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
I'll say one thing for you Hoover , you're bloody consistent . In fact when Charlie came on I thought he improved us and made us more of an attacking threat.Hoover Attack wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:09 pm Great result, awful performance. I understand why we're having to do what we're doing but it ain't pretty to watch. If we're going to persist with the narrow 5-2-2-1, we somehow need to keep both Yusuf and Alan out wide.
Outstanding shift from the defensive unit, Forrester and Stevens the pick of the bunch yet again.
Literally no idea how Competition Winner got on the bench and got some minutes once more. Laughable contribution from him yet again. Can you imagine being Clare or Theo or Mitchell or Oyekunle or (is that it?) stuck at home for that?![]()
-
Hedmans Header
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 6:47 am
- Has thanked: 187 times
- Been thanked: 275 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
Totally agree thought Blackpool were 2nd bestThe Reverend wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 9:01 pm Am I the only one who thought Blackpool were a bit naff? They could have played for 3 more hours and not scored.
Their corners were especially bad.
All in all a pretty poor match. A win is a win but we saw two teams who will be lucky to hit mid-table this season.
all over the park and Os looked comfortable winners ..
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend

- Posts: 16651
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 7224 times
- Been thanked: 5672 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
No, it’s not opinion, it’s fact. We started with Yusef and Aaron as two tens, playing narrow behind Kabia. Yusef basically didn’t touch the ball for the first twenty mins and went wide where he got a bit more of the ball albeit being doubled up on and shown outside. Connolly drifted wider a few times but stayed relatively central.Top of the JES wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 9:24 pmIf that's how you saw it fine, we saw it differently. Connolly was wide in the first half Yusuf was too to start with but ineffective and got pulled inside midway through the first half, Yusuf and Connolly are never going to double up with our full backs no matter what the formation.Hoover Attack wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:14 pmWrong analysis.Top of the JES wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 4:03 pm Playing "wing backs" and two wide players in front of them does not work, it just leaves a lack of bodies and a hole in central midfield. Blackpool have put in two or three great crosses and we are surviving at the moment.
We played with wing backs, both Yusuf and Alan played narrow. Those crosses came in because they were overloading the wide areas (because we didn't have wingers supporting the wing backs).
We did at least try to put Yusuf out wide by inverting Stevens after a bit in the first half.
- Bandy Legs
- Boardin' 24/7

- Posts: 8455
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:37 pm
- Has thanked: 2858 times
- Been thanked: 1216 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
Did We ?Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 9:53 pmNo, it’s not opinion, it’s fact. We started with Yusef and Aaron as two tens, playing narrow behind Kabia. Yusef basically didn’t touch the ball for the first twenty mins and went wide where he got a bit more of the ball albeit being doubled up on and shown outside. Connolly drifted wider a few times but stayed relatively central.Top of the JES wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 9:24 pmIf that's how you saw it fine, we saw it differently. Connolly was wide in the first half Yusuf was too to start with but ineffective and got pulled inside midway through the first half, Yusuf and Connolly are never going to double up with our full backs no matter what the formation.Hoover Attack wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:14 pm
Wrong analysis.
We played with wing backs, both Yusuf and Alan played narrow. Those crosses came in because they were overloading the wide areas (because we didn't have wingers supporting the wing backs).
We did at least try to put Yusuf out wide by inverting Stevens after a bit in the first half.
Dave Victor & his sidekick kept saying Connolly is playing wide & Yusuf was more inside & got swapped out as he was ineffective !
I know DV talks 5h!te at times but its pretty much what I saw on the Screen
- Hoover Attack
- MB Legend

- Posts: 15004
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 1950 times
- Been thanked: 4048 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
Well have to agree to disagree on that thenTop of the JES wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 9:24 pmIf that's how you saw it fine, we saw it differently. Connolly was wide in the first half Yusuf was too to start with but ineffective and got pulled inside midway through the first half, Yusuf and Connolly are never going to double up with our full backs no matter what the formation.Hoover Attack wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:14 pmWrong analysis.Top of the JES wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 4:03 pm Playing "wing backs" and two wide players in front of them does not work, it just leaves a lack of bodies and a hole in central midfield. Blackpool have put in two or three great crosses and we are surviving at the moment.
We played with wing backs, both Yusuf and Alan played narrow. Those crosses came in because they were overloading the wide areas (because we didn't have wingers supporting the wing backs).
We did at least try to put Yusuf out wide by inverting Stevens after a bit in the first half.
Harsh on Yusuf and Alan. The suggestion they won’t double up with our full backs implies they’re not prepared to graft and track back, which isn’t the case. They both got through loads of running without the ball today.
- Hoover Attack
- MB Legend

- Posts: 15004
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 1950 times
- Been thanked: 4048 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
I remember him doing one bit of skill where he kind of beat a player but then lost the ball to a second player ( and Iddy had to pick up a yellow to stop them breaking on transition) but other than that, can’t remember one positive thing in possession.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 9:40 pmI'll say one thing for you Hoover , you're bloody consistent . In fact when Charlie came on I thought he improved us and made us more of an attacking threat.Hoover Attack wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:09 pm Great result, awful performance. I understand why we're having to do what we're doing but it ain't pretty to watch. If we're going to persist with the narrow 5-2-2-1, we somehow need to keep both Yusuf and Alan out wide.
Outstanding shift from the defensive unit, Forrester and Stevens the pick of the bunch yet again.
Literally no idea how Competition Winner got on the bench and got some minutes once more. Laughable contribution from him yet again. Can you imagine being Clare or Theo or Mitchell or Oyekunle or (is that it?) stuck at home for that?![]()
Remember him running around a bit out of possession but don’t recall a single tackle or turn over.
-
RedDwarf 1881
- MB Legend

- Posts: 16360
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 3462 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
I thought Morris had his hands full today with Bowyer but he did very well against him .Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 9:07 pmThought Morris was back to almost his best today. Made good decisions, committed and aggressiveHoover Attack wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:16 pmThought Morris did ok to limit his output.CharlieO wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:03 pm
For those not at the game, Bowyer was booked for diving in the Orient penalty box in the first half, and accordingly booed every time he got the ball after that. Was indeed the best player on the pitch first half though.
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend

- Posts: 16651
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 7224 times
- Been thanked: 5672 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
Wasn’t his name Bowler?RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 10:20 pmI thought Morris had his hands full today with Bowyer but he did very well against him .Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 9:07 pmThought Morris was back to almost his best today. Made good decisions, committed and aggressive
- Proposition Joe
- Boardin' 24/7

- Posts: 7199
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 3335 times
- Been thanked: 2686 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
Hats off to whoever got it right.Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2026 9:53 amWasn’t his name Bowler?RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 10:20 pmI thought Morris had his hands full today with Bowyer but he did very well against him .Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 9:07 pm
Thought Morris was back to almost his best today. Made good decisions, committed and aggressive
-
Red_Army
- Tiresome troll

- Posts: 1527
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 6:57 pm
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
I actually think you're all wrong in terms of the formation. It looked to me like it was a 5 2 1 2, with Connolly and Kabia through the middle and Akhamrich as a 10. Connolly drifted wide left and Akhamrich wide right.
-
E10quence
- Tiresome troll

- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2026 5:04 pm
- Has thanked: 629 times
- Been thanked: 667 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
More 5-2-2-1. But who cares, it didn't really work for us.Red_Army wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2026 12:41 pm I actually think you're all wrong in terms of the formation. It looked to me like it was a 5 2 1 2, with Connolly and Kabia through the middle and Akhamrich as a 10. Connolly drifted wide left and Akhamrich wide right.
If we're sticking with back five (and I think we should), I think we need to go 5-3-1-1 - Scarlett up top, Connolly playing just behind him, with license to drift around.
For the midfield three, ideally would be El Miz, Gilbert, Hayden. If Hayden out, Clare could do a job, or if want to go a bit more attacking/creative, would like to see Dobra or OON (when he's back/fit). Inevitably, will end up being Wellens though.
Akhamrich would do better as an impact sub when the opposition are tiring.
-
VeganO
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:17 pm
- Location: Middle Earth
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 316 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
I went yesterday & was very pleased with the win & clean sheet. I thought that Pool deserved to get something from the game.
Our defence was good & were under a fair amount of pressure at several points in the game.
I liked Stevens & Gilbert.
I thought Morris did ok but wasn't he leaving Mr dive in the penalty box with too much space?
Hayden for me was off the pace.
Connolly obviously not match fit yet.
Kabia ran himself into the ground. I don't think he will score lots of goals.
Scarlett looked good & I believe will do well here.
So hopefully onwards & upwards.
UTO'S
Our defence was good & were under a fair amount of pressure at several points in the game.
I liked Stevens & Gilbert.
I thought Morris did ok but wasn't he leaving Mr dive in the penalty box with too much space?
Hayden for me was off the pace.
Connolly obviously not match fit yet.
Kabia ran himself into the ground. I don't think he will score lots of goals.
Scarlett looked good & I believe will do well here.
So hopefully onwards & upwards.
UTO'S
-
Chief crazy horse
- Regular

- Posts: 3808
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:02 pm
- Has thanked: 575 times
- Been thanked: 818 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
Like most of our performances this season ( and last if you like), awful and not pretty to watch. Makes you wonder where we are supposed to be going.Hoover Attack wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 8:09 pm Great result, awful performance. I understand why we're having to do what we're doing but it ain't pretty to watch. If we're going to persist with the narrow 5-2-2-1, we somehow need to keep both Yusuf and Alan out wide.
Outstanding shift from the defensive unit, Forrester and Stevens the pick of the bunch yet again.
Literally no idea how Competition Winner got on the bench and got some minutes once more. Laughable contribution from him yet again. Can you imagine being Clare or Theo or Mitchell or Oyekunle or (is that it?) stuck at home for that?![]()
-
RedDwarf 1881
- MB Legend

- Posts: 16360
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 3462 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
Erm, yeah . apologiesRich Tea Wellin wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2026 9:53 amWasn’t his name Bowler?RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 10:20 pmI thought Morris had his hands full today with Bowyer but he did very well against him .Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2026 9:07 pm
Thought Morris was back to almost his best today. Made good decisions, committed and aggressive
- Hoover Attack
- MB Legend

- Posts: 15004
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 1950 times
- Been thanked: 4048 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
For their goal kicks we set up as you’re suggesting to stop them playing outRed_Army wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2026 12:41 pm I actually think you're all wrong in terms of the formation. It looked to me like it was a 5 2 1 2, with Connolly and Kabia through the middle and Akhamrich as a 10. Connolly drifted wide left and Akhamrich wide right.
-
Orientnil
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:53 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 125 times
Re: Exiles Thread - Blackpool (H)
As it's the exiles thread and most of us are abroad, I thought you might like to know that someone gifted us a tub of Cornish clotted cream and I'm scoffing it now with fresh baked scones and strawberry jam. Jealous enough yet or should I describe it some more?