Page 237 of 342
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 4:51 pm
by Smendrick Feaselberg
I'll do the deaths count first today to avoid offending Ronnie : another 1,290 sadly, though much down on yesterday's. In reality, the figures reported yesterday were probably too high and today too low because of the usual reporting quirks. Will be good if anyone can post up the actuals (and link to where those come from)
Patients admitted to hospital trend is now turning (down 1.1%) and new infections are down by 25% in the last seven days too. 300k+ vaccines reported to have been administered in the past day too So good news on these counts.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:03 pm
by Top of the JES
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 4:51 pm
I'll do the deaths count first today to avoid offending Ronnie : another 1,290 sadly, though much down on yesterday's. In reality, the figures reported yesterday were probably too high and today too low because of the usual reporting quirks. Will be good if anyone can post up the actuals (and link to where those come from)
Patients admitted to hospital trend is now turning (down 1.1%) and new infections are down by 25% in the last seven days too. 300k+ vaccines reported to have been administered in the past day too So good news on these counts.
Wont see that deaths figure drop for another few days yet unfortunately - same with the numbers on ventilatators, But admissions coming down is a good sign and hopefully we will see a steady if unspectacular drop daily from here on in. Infection rates for the last six days as a percentage of tests carried out have been 9.34%, 8.42%, 9.25%, 6.74%, 5.76%, 6.07% at it's peak two or three weeks ago we were lookin at figures of 12.13 or even 14%.
Another 67 sites came on line for vaccinations today, as long as the supply of Vaccine holds up the mid February deadline for the target groups is well acheivable.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:04 pm
by Long slender neck
Likely to change
20-01-2021 334
19-01-2021 822
18-01-2021 1,032
17-01-2021 1,025
16-01-2021 1,058
Unlikely to change significantly
15-01-2021 1,017
14-01-2021 1,087
13-01-2021 1,096
12-01-2021 1,117
11-01-2021 1,091
10-01-2021 1,001
09-01-2021 1,000
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:13 pm
by Top of the JES
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 3:32 pm
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:47 pm
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Wed Jan 20, 2021 4:17 pm
Patients admitted to hospital is flat now (up 0.5% in latest seven day period). Coupled with tumbling infection percentage things should hopefully be improving as far as hospitals go in the next few weeks. Another 340k first vaccines administered too.
New high for deaths though - 1,820.
1,820 deaths is the headline from today’s announcements.
Talk about bias.
Yeah, it's the headline and a really grim fact but we sadly knew that deaths would be this high around now and things get worse. We've acknowledged that many times in this thread already. But fixating on deaths only when there is the bigger picture to consider would be wrong because this thread isn't just about the headlines. Just hope that the daily updates can get a little better each time so the compound effect kicks in over time.
I just dont watch BBC news anymore.
I think by now we all know the terrible death toll involved with this pandemic. But there is so much more now to be optimistic about not that you would ever think so watching BBC News. ITV and others have a better balanced approach IMHO, while they report the figures as they must they dont feel they have to have a five minute segment every day with an "expert" telling us deaths at an all time high but not explaining the that the shambolic reporting system is mainly the reason for some alarming jumps in figures.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:02 pm
by Thor
Oh dear this is worrying. No end in sight to this very bad flu.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech ... nated.html
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:05 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:04 pm
Likely to change
20-01-2021 334
19-01-2021 822
18-01-2021 1,032
17-01-2021 1,025
16-01-2021 1,058
Unlikely to change significantly
15-01-2021 1,017
14-01-2021 1,087
13-01-2021 1,096
12-01-2021 1,117
11-01-2021 1,091
10-01-2021 1,001
09-01-2021 1,000
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
You ignoring all the olds in the care homes again?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:08 pm
by tuffers#1
Top of the JES wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:03 pm
Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 4:51 pm
I'll do the deaths count first today to avoid offending Ronnie : another 1,290 sadly, though much down on yesterday's. In reality, the figures reported yesterday were probably too high and today too low because of the usual reporting quirks. Will be good if anyone can post up the actuals (and link to where those come from)
Patients admitted to hospital trend is now turning (down 1.1%) and new infections are down by 25% in the last seven days too. 300k+ vaccines reported to have been administered in the past day too So good news on these counts.
Wont see that deaths figure drop for another few days yet unfortunately - same with the numbers on ventilatators, But admissions coming down is a good sign and hopefully we will see a steady if unspectacular drop daily from here on in. Infection rates for the last six days as a percentage of tests carried out have been 9.34%, 8.42%, 9.25%, 6.74%, 5.76%, 6.07% at it's peak two or three weeks ago we were lookin at figures of 12.13 or even 14%.
Another 67 sites came on line for vaccinations today, as long as the supply of Vaccine holds up the mid February deadline for the target groups is well acheivable.
Intensive care numbers at there highest today
According to Priti Patel on her press conference .
Higher than April.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:09 pm
by Still wrong
Who was the so called expert who said we will be on our way back to normal by March?
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/188 ... ts-saying/
Re: Surprise Surprise
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pm
by Dohnut
Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 1:56 pm
Dohnut (ALM) wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:36 pm
Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 7:55 am
Yep,
Don’t spend millions on something which probably won’t work.
It’s a panic move.
And to then totally ignore the manufacturer’s instructions is beyond stupid.
This idea was Tony Blair’s.
Why are they acting on the advice of someone with no qualifications in this?
My question was less about what not to do. But what ideas you have on what we should be doing.
Protect the most vulnerable.
That’s it. First of all, all people are vulnerable, some more than others. Some to a greater extent than others. You really need to think it through. It’s easy to criticise this, moan about that. But in truth you have no idea what you would do faced with this crisis.
Moan about others but have no idea what you would do, in any depth.
Pathetic. You are one big moaner.
Re: Surprise Surprise
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:43 pm
by Still wrong
Dohnut (ALM) wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pm
Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 1:56 pm
Dohnut (ALM) wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:36 pm
My question was less about what not to do. But what ideas you have on what we should be doing.
Protect the most vulnerable.
That’s it. First of all, all people are vulnerable, some more than others. Some to a greater extent than others. You really need to think it through. It’s easy to criticise this, moan about that. But in truth you have no idea what you would do faced with this crisis.
Moan about others but have no idea what you would do, in any depth.
Pathetic. You are one big moaner.
What is the death toll for the under 60s with no underlining issues?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:45 pm
by Long slender neck
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:05 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:04 pm
Likely to change
20-01-2021 334
19-01-2021 822
18-01-2021 1,032
17-01-2021 1,025
16-01-2021 1,058
Unlikely to change significantly
15-01-2021 1,017
14-01-2021 1,087
13-01-2021 1,096
12-01-2021 1,117
11-01-2021 1,091
10-01-2021 1,001
09-01-2021 1,000
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
You ignoring all the olds in the care homes again?
No. See my answer when you asked this yesterday.
Re: Surprise Surprise
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:50 pm
by Still wrong
Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:43 pm
Dohnut (ALM) wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pm
Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 1:56 pm
Protect the most vulnerable.
That’s it. First of all, all people are vulnerable, some more than others. Some to a greater extent than others. You really need to think it through. It’s easy to criticise this, moan about that. But in truth you have no idea what you would do faced with this crisis.
Moan about others but have no idea what you would do, in any depth.
Pathetic. You are one big moaner.
What is the death toll for the under 60s with no underlining issues?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13584329/ ... onditions/
Re: Surprise Surprise
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:55 pm
by tuffers#1
Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:50 pm
Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:43 pm
Dohnut (ALM) wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pm
That’s it. First of all, all people are vulnerable, some more than others. Some to a greater extent than others. You really need to think it through. It’s easy to criticise this, moan about that. But in truth you have no idea what you would do faced with this crisis.
Moan about others but have no idea what you would do, in any depth.
Pathetic. You are one big moaner.
What is the death toll for the under 60s with no underlining issues?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13584329/ ... onditions/
That article is pre christmas
please find an upto date one
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 7:07 pm
by Thor
The fact remains Tuffers not many have died under 60 with zero underlying health issues.
Re: Surprise Surprise
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 7:37 pm
by Still wrong
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:55 pm
That article is pre christmas
please find an upto date one
Oh yeah I am sure there is going to be thousands of under 60 s have died in the last month with no underlying conditions.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 7:39 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
What’s the definition of underlying health condition?
Are they counting people with a broken finger?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 7:50 pm
by BoniO
Thor wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 7:07 pm
The fact remains Tuffers not many have died under 60 with zero underlying health issues.
Your point is?
Even if your statement above is true, what conclusion are you stumbling to?
How does this affect our current position in the UK?
Re: Surprise Surprise
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 7:56 pm
by tuffers#1
Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 7:37 pm
tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:55 pm
That article is pre christmas
please find an upto date one
Oh yeah I am sure there is going to be thousands of under 60 s have died in the last month with no underlying conditions.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... -19-deaths
Within the period from 30 January to 31 December 2020, 2,280,658 cases of COVID-19 have been detected in England.
In the same period, there have been 72,178 deaths in persons with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, with the first death occurring on 2 March 2020. This represents a mortality rate of 128.2 per 100,000 population.
Today 93,290
Are you privy to info on the 21,000 deaths in the last 21 days ?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:47 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:45 pm
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:05 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:04 pm
Likely to change
20-01-2021 334
19-01-2021 822
18-01-2021 1,032
17-01-2021 1,025
16-01-2021 1,058
Unlikely to change significantly
15-01-2021 1,017
14-01-2021 1,087
13-01-2021 1,096
12-01-2021 1,117
11-01-2021 1,091
10-01-2021 1,001
09-01-2021 1,000
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
You ignoring all the olds in the care homes again?
No. See my answer when you asked this yesterday.
So why are you saying there’s 1,000 people dying per day when current numbers are close to 2,000?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:58 pm
by Long slender neck
The daily deaths 'reported' do not all occur on the same day.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:31 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Oh, we’re doing this again
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2021 9:38 am
by A Pedant
Thor wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:02 pm
No end in sight to this very bad flu.
Why do you persist in calling it a 'flu' when it isn't? WUMming again?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2021 10:01 am
by A Pedant
Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 7:39 pm
What’s the definition of underlying health condition?
My understanding is that it's any health condition (mental or physical) that is chronic or long-term. So for example, I take tablets for high blood pressure, so even though the medication keeps my blood pressure at normal (and I'm otherwise healthy, touch wood), if I die of Covid-19 in hospital I'd be recorded as 'underlying health condition'.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2021 10:10 am
by Currywurst and Chips
400 person wedding broken up in Stamford Hill
Damn you Dominic Cummings!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-55764673
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2021 10:42 am
by BoniO
Damn all religious loons who think they have a god-given right to do what they want to do. Before the sh*t hits, that goes for ALL, I repeat, ALL religions and ALL shapes, sizes, and colour of the associated loons.
