Coronavirus
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7326
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:32 pm
- Has thanked: 1099 times
- Been thanked: 1343 times
Re: Coronavirus
I'll do the deaths count first today to avoid offending Ronnie : another 1,290 sadly, though much down on yesterday's. In reality, the figures reported yesterday were probably too high and today too low because of the usual reporting quirks. Will be good if anyone can post up the actuals (and link to where those come from)
Patients admitted to hospital trend is now turning (down 1.1%) and new infections are down by 25% in the last seven days too. 300k+ vaccines reported to have been administered in the past day too So good news on these counts.
Patients admitted to hospital trend is now turning (down 1.1%) and new infections are down by 25% in the last seven days too. 300k+ vaccines reported to have been administered in the past day too So good news on these counts.
- Top of the JES
- Regular
- Posts: 3648
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 1249 times
- Been thanked: 1253 times
Re: Coronavirus
Wont see that deaths figure drop for another few days yet unfortunately - same with the numbers on ventilatators, But admissions coming down is a good sign and hopefully we will see a steady if unspectacular drop daily from here on in. Infection rates for the last six days as a percentage of tests carried out have been 9.34%, 8.42%, 9.25%, 6.74%, 5.76%, 6.07% at it's peak two or three weeks ago we were lookin at figures of 12.13 or even 14%.Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 4:51 pm I'll do the deaths count first today to avoid offending Ronnie : another 1,290 sadly, though much down on yesterday's. In reality, the figures reported yesterday were probably too high and today too low because of the usual reporting quirks. Will be good if anyone can post up the actuals (and link to where those come from)
Patients admitted to hospital trend is now turning (down 1.1%) and new infections are down by 25% in the last seven days too. 300k+ vaccines reported to have been administered in the past day too So good news on these counts.
Another 67 sites came on line for vaccinations today, as long as the supply of Vaccine holds up the mid February deadline for the target groups is well acheivable.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14325
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2511 times
- Been thanked: 3301 times
Re: Coronavirus
Likely to change
20-01-2021 334
19-01-2021 822
18-01-2021 1,032
17-01-2021 1,025
16-01-2021 1,058
Unlikely to change significantly
15-01-2021 1,017
14-01-2021 1,087
13-01-2021 1,096
12-01-2021 1,117
11-01-2021 1,091
10-01-2021 1,001
09-01-2021 1,000
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
20-01-2021 334
19-01-2021 822
18-01-2021 1,032
17-01-2021 1,025
16-01-2021 1,058
Unlikely to change significantly
15-01-2021 1,017
14-01-2021 1,087
13-01-2021 1,096
12-01-2021 1,117
11-01-2021 1,091
10-01-2021 1,001
09-01-2021 1,000
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
- Top of the JES
- Regular
- Posts: 3648
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 1249 times
- Been thanked: 1253 times
Re: Coronavirus
I just dont watch BBC news anymore.Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 3:32 pmYeah, it's the headline and a really grim fact but we sadly knew that deaths would be this high around now and things get worse. We've acknowledged that many times in this thread already. But fixating on deaths only when there is the bigger picture to consider would be wrong because this thread isn't just about the headlines. Just hope that the daily updates can get a little better each time so the compound effect kicks in over time.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:47 pm1,820 deaths is the headline from today’s announcements.Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Wed Jan 20, 2021 4:17 pm Patients admitted to hospital is flat now (up 0.5% in latest seven day period). Coupled with tumbling infection percentage things should hopefully be improving as far as hospitals go in the next few weeks. Another 340k first vaccines administered too.
New high for deaths though - 1,820.
Talk about bias.
I think by now we all know the terrible death toll involved with this pandemic. But there is so much more now to be optimistic about not that you would ever think so watching BBC News. ITV and others have a better balanced approach IMHO, while they report the figures as they must they dont feel they have to have a five minute segment every day with an "expert" telling us deaths at an all time high but not explaining the that the shambolic reporting system is mainly the reason for some alarming jumps in figures.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Coronavirus
Oh dear this is worrying. No end in sight to this very bad flu.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech ... nated.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech ... nated.html
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Coronavirus
You ignoring all the olds in the care homes again?Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:04 pm Likely to change
20-01-2021 334
19-01-2021 822
18-01-2021 1,032
17-01-2021 1,025
16-01-2021 1,058
Unlikely to change significantly
15-01-2021 1,017
14-01-2021 1,087
13-01-2021 1,096
12-01-2021 1,117
11-01-2021 1,091
10-01-2021 1,001
09-01-2021 1,000
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Coronavirus
Intensive care numbers at there highest todayTop of the JES wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:03 pmWont see that deaths figure drop for another few days yet unfortunately - same with the numbers on ventilatators, But admissions coming down is a good sign and hopefully we will see a steady if unspectacular drop daily from here on in. Infection rates for the last six days as a percentage of tests carried out have been 9.34%, 8.42%, 9.25%, 6.74%, 5.76%, 6.07% at it's peak two or three weeks ago we were lookin at figures of 12.13 or even 14%.Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 4:51 pm I'll do the deaths count first today to avoid offending Ronnie : another 1,290 sadly, though much down on yesterday's. In reality, the figures reported yesterday were probably too high and today too low because of the usual reporting quirks. Will be good if anyone can post up the actuals (and link to where those come from)
Patients admitted to hospital trend is now turning (down 1.1%) and new infections are down by 25% in the last seven days too. 300k+ vaccines reported to have been administered in the past day too So good news on these counts.
Another 67 sites came on line for vaccinations today, as long as the supply of Vaccine holds up the mid February deadline for the target groups is well acheivable.
According to Priti Patel on her press conference .
Higher than April.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2453
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:47 pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 301 times
Re: Coronavirus
Who was the so called expert who said we will be on our way back to normal by March?Thor wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:02 pm Oh dear this is worrying. No end in sight to this very bad flu.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech ... nated.html
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/188 ... ts-saying/
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 661 times
Re: Surprise Surprise
That’s it. First of all, all people are vulnerable, some more than others. Some to a greater extent than others. You really need to think it through. It’s easy to criticise this, moan about that. But in truth you have no idea what you would do faced with this crisis.Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 1:56 pmProtect the most vulnerable.Dohnut (ALM) wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:36 pmMy question was less about what not to do. But what ideas you have on what we should be doing.Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 7:55 am
Yep,
Don’t spend millions on something which probably won’t work.
It’s a panic move.
And to then totally ignore the manufacturer’s instructions is beyond stupid.
This idea was Tony Blair’s.
Why are they acting on the advice of someone with no qualifications in this?
Moan about others but have no idea what you would do, in any depth.
Pathetic. You are one big moaner.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2453
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:47 pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 301 times
Re: Surprise Surprise
What is the death toll for the under 60s with no underlining issues?Dohnut (ALM) wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pmThat’s it. First of all, all people are vulnerable, some more than others. Some to a greater extent than others. You really need to think it through. It’s easy to criticise this, moan about that. But in truth you have no idea what you would do faced with this crisis.Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 1:56 pmProtect the most vulnerable.Dohnut (ALM) wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:36 pm
My question was less about what not to do. But what ideas you have on what we should be doing.
Moan about others but have no idea what you would do, in any depth.
Pathetic. You are one big moaner.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14325
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2511 times
- Been thanked: 3301 times
Re: Coronavirus
No. See my answer when you asked this yesterday.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:05 pmYou ignoring all the olds in the care homes again?Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:04 pm Likely to change
20-01-2021 334
19-01-2021 822
18-01-2021 1,032
17-01-2021 1,025
16-01-2021 1,058
Unlikely to change significantly
15-01-2021 1,017
14-01-2021 1,087
13-01-2021 1,096
12-01-2021 1,117
11-01-2021 1,091
10-01-2021 1,001
09-01-2021 1,000
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2453
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:47 pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 301 times
Re: Surprise Surprise
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13584329/ ... onditions/Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:43 pmWhat is the death toll for the under 60s with no underlining issues?Dohnut (ALM) wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pmThat’s it. First of all, all people are vulnerable, some more than others. Some to a greater extent than others. You really need to think it through. It’s easy to criticise this, moan about that. But in truth you have no idea what you would do faced with this crisis.
Moan about others but have no idea what you would do, in any depth.
Pathetic. You are one big moaner.
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Surprise Surprise
That article is pre christmasStill wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:50 pmhttps://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13584329/ ... onditions/Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:43 pmWhat is the death toll for the under 60s with no underlining issues?Dohnut (ALM) wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pm
That’s it. First of all, all people are vulnerable, some more than others. Some to a greater extent than others. You really need to think it through. It’s easy to criticise this, moan about that. But in truth you have no idea what you would do faced with this crisis.
Moan about others but have no idea what you would do, in any depth.
Pathetic. You are one big moaner.
please find an upto date one
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Coronavirus
The fact remains Tuffers not many have died under 60 with zero underlying health issues.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2453
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:47 pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 301 times
Re: Surprise Surprise
Oh yeah I am sure there is going to be thousands of under 60 s have died in the last month with no underlying conditions.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:55 pmThat article is pre christmasStill wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:50 pmhttps://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13584329/ ... onditions/Still wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:43 pm
What is the death toll for the under 60s with no underlining issues?
please find an upto date one
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10551
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3249 times
Re: Coronavirus
What’s the definition of underlying health condition?
Are they counting people with a broken finger?
Are they counting people with a broken finger?
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4707
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1119 times
- Been thanked: 757 times
Re: Coronavirus
Your point is?
Even if your statement above is true, what conclusion are you stumbling to?
How does this affect our current position in the UK?
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Surprise Surprise
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... -19-deathsStill wrong wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 7:37 pmOh yeah I am sure there is going to be thousands of under 60 s have died in the last month with no underlying conditions.
Within the period from 30 January to 31 December 2020, 2,280,658 cases of COVID-19 have been detected in England.
In the same period, there have been 72,178 deaths in persons with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, with the first death occurring on 2 March 2020. This represents a mortality rate of 128.2 per 100,000 population.
Today 93,290
Are you privy to info on the 21,000 deaths in the last 21 days ?
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Coronavirus
So why are you saying there’s 1,000 people dying per day when current numbers are close to 2,000?Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:45 pmNo. See my answer when you asked this yesterday.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:05 pmYou ignoring all the olds in the care homes again?Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:04 pm Likely to change
20-01-2021 334
19-01-2021 822
18-01-2021 1,032
17-01-2021 1,025
16-01-2021 1,058
Unlikely to change significantly
15-01-2021 1,017
14-01-2021 1,087
13-01-2021 1,096
12-01-2021 1,117
11-01-2021 1,091
10-01-2021 1,001
09-01-2021 1,000
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14325
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2511 times
- Been thanked: 3301 times
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 172 times
Re: Coronavirus
My understanding is that it's any health condition (mental or physical) that is chronic or long-term. So for example, I take tablets for high blood pressure, so even though the medication keeps my blood pressure at normal (and I'm otherwise healthy, touch wood), if I die of Covid-19 in hospital I'd be recorded as 'underlying health condition'.
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6234
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1488 times
Re: Coronavirus
400 person wedding broken up in Stamford Hill
Damn you Dominic Cummings!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-55764673
Damn you Dominic Cummings!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-55764673
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4707
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1119 times
- Been thanked: 757 times
Re: Coronavirus
Damn all religious loons who think they have a god-given right to do what they want to do. Before the sh*t hits, that goes for ALL, I repeat, ALL religions and ALL shapes, sizes, and colour of the associated loons.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 10:10 am 400 person wedding broken up in Stamford Hill
Damn you Dominic Cummings!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-55764673