Story of O wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:33 pm
I suppose they have a point. I think there should be a by election anyway when someone defects. The voters of Bury South did not vote Labour, but now have a Labour MP
did they do the same for churchill when he defected to the tories ?
Did he defect to the Tories? I thought he went Tories to Liberal, then was independent and after that went back to the Tories. But in answer to your question, no but they should have.
I dont know , hence why i asked .
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:19 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:21 pm
Momentum are upset that Labour have regained a seat from the Tories.
Momentum have this one right.
It’s embarrassing that he’s been welcomed as he has and says everything about Starmers ‘politics’.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:41 pm
by Dunners
Blimey. I can only imagine how furious you lot will be should Labour ever beat the Tories in a general election.
Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:21 pm
Momentum are upset that Labour have regained a seat from the Tories.
Momentum have this one right.
It’s embarrassing that he’s been welcomed as he has and says everything about Starmers ‘politics’.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:23 pm
by slacker
Can't wait for the likes of Anna Soubry and that Change bunch of chancers to declare their love for Starmer's brand of Labour...
Don't get me wrong, anything but the current Tories (and their Faragist mates) would be better than this lot, but you'd be a fool to think Starmer will deliver anything that will upset or challenge the current set-up.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 6:04 pm
by Stowaway
slacker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:23 pm
Can't wait for the likes of Anna Soubry and that Change bunch of chancers to declare their love for Starmer's brand of Labour...
Don't get me wrong, anything but the current Tories (and their Faragist mates) would be better than this lot, but you'd be a fool to think Starmer will deliver anything that will upset or challenge the current set-up.
Soubry et al were more akin to Blair’s brand of Labour. Wakeford is a horrible poo poo who, without Brexit, would have been tarred and feathered if he’d shown his face and blue rosette in Bury before 2019. If I was a constituent I’d be kicking the town hall door down demanding a by-election.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 6:38 pm
by Dunners
Time to bring Chuka back.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:46 pm
by Dohnut
slacker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:23 pm
Can't wait for the likes of Anna Soubry and that Change bunch of chancers to declare their love for Starmer's brand of Labour...
Don't get me wrong, anything but the current Tories (and their Faragist mates) would be better than this lot, but you'd be a fool to think Starmer will deliver anything that will upset or challenge the current set-up.
So you agree on negative voting. People voting for Boris only because the alternative was worse. That’s exactly why Boris got in. Don’t blame Voters for the current shambles. Blame Corbyn.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:55 pm
by tuffers#1
Easier to blame the simpletons who didnt vote RED because they again fell for RIGHT WING lies .
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:04 pm
by Dunners
"Lenin"
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 6:09 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
"Bliar”
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2022 8:12 pm
by tuffers#1
Great Speech
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:49 pm
by tuffers#1
Nancy destroys Gove
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2022 3:49 pm
by Dohnut
Perv Ahmed gets 5 years
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2022 4:03 pm
by Clive Evans
Dohnut said:- Perv Ahmed gets 5 years
I say:- I bet your Party has more Pervs than our Party!
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2022 4:05 pm
by Dohnut
Clive Evans wrote: ↑Fri Feb 04, 2022 4:03 pm
Dohnut said:- Perv Ahmed gets 5 years
I say:- I bet your Party has more Pervs than our Party!
My party. I don’t have a party. And my views that all parties have their share of shits remains intact.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2022 4:21 pm
by Clive Evans
Doh :- If that is your true & honest opinion, why did you deem it worthy to post about Perv Ahmed on the Labour thread? Surely that would be incongruous. All Parties must have a fair share of: Pervs, Murderers, Cheats, Womanisers, Mobsters, Alcoholics etc Oh! & Liars , although some seem to fair a bit better than others.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2022 4:30 pm
by tuffers#1
Good that he has been jailed & convicted
While alive .
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2022 9:14 pm
by Dohnut
Clive Evans wrote: ↑Fri Feb 04, 2022 4:21 pm
Doh :- If that is your true & honest opinion, why did you deem it worthy to post about Perv Ahmed on the Labour thread? Surely that would be incongruous. All Parties must have a fair share of: Pervs, Murderers, Cheats, Womanisers, Mobsters, Alcoholics etc Oh! & Liars , although some seem to fair a bit better than others.
Where else post about a Labour peer but on a Labour thread. And I don’t have a party. Used to be strong Labour from a strong Labour background. Now I vote for the leader who I believe best suited to the job. Voted for Thatcher, voted for Blair. Voted for Boris as the least worst candidate, despite the fact I dislike the guy with a passion.
It’s people like me whose votes change Governments. Not those who vote red or blue for no real reason other than that’s what they do.
I’ve always said both parties have their share of baddies. And I want Boris to go - pronto.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:31 am
by Dunners
Slow and steady.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 1:44 pm
by Max B Gold
Dunners wrote: ↑Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:31 am
Slow and steady.
That's what youse get when the grown ups are in charge.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2022 2:29 pm
by Max B Gold
Couldn't have put it better myself except I would have said flaccid war willy instead.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2022 3:01 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Pretty sure the reason they’re bankrupt is because of Corbyns court cases.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2022 3:22 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 3:01 pm
Pretty sure the reason they’re bankrupt is because of Corbyns court cases.
What court cases?
Labour are broke because 200,000 members left, and they not paying a subscription any more, plus 2 unions not giving Labour any funds now, because they have left their working class roots.
A general election now, would finish Labour off financially
They would lose it too, despite Johnson and his unpopularity.
Starmer is a liability