Re: To Serve and Protect
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:51 pm
The geezer is still going on a press tour
Here’s the full clip with context if you’re interested
Here’s the full clip with context if you’re interested
The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
If by "nutter" you mean an active asset of a foreign state then I concur.Rich Tea Wellin wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 10:46 pm Even other Jewish groups are supportive of the met and distancing themselves from this nutter
For a simple "Jewish man wanting to walk where he wants" he had a few heavyweight minders with him - almost like he was looking for a confrontation....Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 11:11 pmIf by "nutter" you mean an active asset of a foreign state then I concur.Rich Tea Wellin wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 10:46 pm Even other Jewish groups are supportive of the met and distancing themselves from this nutter
What a complete moron you are.
No justification for what he does, needs to be kicked out and charged, strange though how no one has posted a video of the 3 armed response cops getting the sh*t kicked out of them by this guy on the floor and his family / mates, all 3 needing hospital treatment.
You are wasting your time with Whitehouse on any subject. He is just a wum. Personally I have no comment on the above incident but in future I would advise you respectfully not to bother with whitehouse he likes to argue for the sake of it.Friend or faux wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2024 9:44 am B.whitehouse+10more~;- No justification for what he does, needs to be kicked out and charged, strange though how no one has posted a video of the 3 armed response cops getting the sh*t kicked out of them by this guy on the floor and his family / mates, all 3 needing hospital treatment.
You could have added that these nice geezers also broke the jaw of a policewoman. That would have spoilt the narratives of Maxy & his ilk. Also if these rogues had got hold of the weapons of the armed officers, that they had done over & started shooting the filming bystanders, I wonder what the public would have said about that?
Friend or faux wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2024 9:44 am B.whitehouse+10more~;- No justification for what he does, needs to be kicked out and charged, strange though how no one has posted a video of the 3 armed response cops getting the sh*t kicked out of them by this guy on the floor and his family / mates, all 3 needing hospital treatment.
You could have added that these nice geezers also broke the jaw of a policewoman. That would have spoilt the narratives of Maxy & his ilk. Also if these rogues had got hold of the weapons of the armed officers, that they had done over & started shooting the filming bystanders, I wonder what the public would have said about that?
Sookmaboaby
Even the GMP aren't claiming a female officer had her jaw broken so why are you spreading that apparent misinformation?Friend or faux wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2024 9:44 am B.whitehouse+10more~;- No justification for what he does, needs to be kicked out and charged, strange though how no one has posted a video of the 3 armed response cops getting the sh*t kicked out of them by this guy on the floor and his family / mates, all 3 needing hospital treatment.
You could have added that these nice geezers also broke the jaw of a policewoman. That would have spoilt the narratives of Maxy & his ilk. Also if these rogues had got hold of the weapons of the armed officers, that they had done over & started shooting the filming bystanders, I wonder what the public would have said about that?
Only commenting on what we can see in this video itself but you can clearly see the copper nearest the camera point at the fella in the grey, who's doing nothing other than standing there and filming, before he gets CS sprayed and dragged to the ground in an apparent chokehold. Seems to be nothing else in this clip that would have provoked that, other than the fact he was filming them, which he's entitled to do.
Where have I done any such thing? Just confirming you got the facts of the matter wrong would have sufficed, you didn't need to make yourself look silly by making something else up on top.Friend or faux wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2024 12:18 pm Preposterous Joe:-Even the GMP aren't claiming a female officer had her jaw broken so why are you spreading that apparent misinformation?
Oh sorry! The Guardian reporting only her nose was broken. I guess that's OK then PJ? I note that you are supporting geezers are so 'ard that they attack a woman.
These same people who are putting down the police would be the very first to welcome the help of the police if they were being threatened or attacked by violent criminals, especially if the offenders were carrying knives or guns.Friend or faux wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2024 12:18 pm Preposterous Joe:-Even the GMP aren't claiming a female officer had her jaw broken so why are you spreading that apparent misinformation?
Oh sorry! The Guardian reporting only her nose was broken. I guess that's OK then PJ? I note that you are supporting geezers are so 'ard that they attack a woman.
Amazing that you can't criticise the Police for using a prone, restrained man's head as a football if you ever want them to just do their job in another situation. Didn't realise it was either/or.Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2024 7:25 pmThese same people who are putting down the police would be the very first to welcome the help of the police if they were being threatened or attacked by violent criminals, especially if the offenders were carrying knives or guns.Friend or faux wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2024 12:18 pm Preposterous Joe:-Even the GMP aren't claiming a female officer had her jaw broken so why are you spreading that apparent misinformation?
Oh sorry! The Guardian reporting only her nose was broken. I guess that's OK then PJ? I note that you are supporting geezers are so 'ard that they attack a woman.