Page 59 of 265
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:22 am
by Disoriented
RedO wrote: ↑Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:19 am
Disoriented wrote: ↑Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:06 am
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Apr 23, 2020 2:54 am
Come on Disso. The Tories are on their knees. Their Leader is a complete failure and they are split.
Strammer was rubbish.
Yes, but he still made mincemeat of Raab.
You know it, we all know it.
You didn’t watch it, did you. He hardly laid a jab on him - someone should tell Sirkier that social distancing doesn’t apply to debating.
I saw bits which led me to making a reasoned judgement.
The Guardian said so too.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:23 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Honestly fella, he was poor.
Like I say, hopefully he’ll improve in time but that was a piss poor start.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:25 am
by Disoriented
RedO wrote: ↑Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:23 am
Honestly fella, he was poor.
Like I say, hopefully he’ll improve in time but that was a p*ss poor start.
Are you saying Raab was any good then?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:33 am
by Currywurst and Chips
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:40 am
by ComeOnYouOs
Not sure why you posted a picture of Jeremy Corbyn We all know what he looks like . He did his duty by turning up to parliament, so can you enlighten me as to why you posted a picture?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:37 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:49 pm
by Mikero
A wee bit specious Maxie. If he starts laying into the tories at this point he gets accused of playing politics with the crisis and the press will plaster it over their front pages for the next decade. Play along and criticise and there is no meat for them. The tories are making a pigs breakfast of things by themselves so all he has to do is sit back and keep pointing out the flaws.
Mikero
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 1:30 pm
by NuneatonO's
Having watched PM Questions, Keir was (quite correctly) playing the long game; and not immediately going for the jugular.
He made Raab look an utterly incompetent, floundering fool - without even bothering to shift into 2nd gear.
I personally can't wait for when 'Spaffer' Johnson
finally decides to crawl out of hiding from under his rock. He's going to get absolutely anihilated by Starmer.
Week in.
Week out.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 2:26 pm
by Lovejoy
NuneatonO's wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 1:30 pm
Having watched PM Questions, Keir was (quite correctly) playing the long game; and not immediately going for the jugular.
He made Raab look an utterly incompetent, floundering fool - without even bothering to shift into 2nd gear.
I personally can't wait for when 'Spaffer' Johnson
finally decides to crawl out of hiding from under his rock. He's going to get absolutely anihilated by Starmer.
Week in.
Week out.
You have got a crystal ball then?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 3:03 pm
by Eat The Rich
Lovejoy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 2:26 pm
NuneatonO's wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 1:30 pm
Having watched PM Questions, Keir was (quite correctly) playing the long game; and not immediately going for the jugular.
He made Raab look an utterly incompetent, floundering fool - without even bothering to shift into 2nd gear.
I personally can't wait for when 'Spaffer' Johnson
finally decides to crawl out of hiding from under his rock. He's going to get absolutely anihilated by Starmer.
Week in.
Week out.
You have got a crystal ball then?
You don't need a crystal ball. BJ has the intellect of a grounded and oxygen starved lump fish.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 10:26 pm
by Disoriented
Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 3:03 pm
Lovejoy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 2:26 pm
NuneatonO's wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 1:30 pm
Having watched PM Questions, Keir was (quite correctly) playing the long game; and not immediately going for the jugular.
He made Raab look an utterly incompetent, floundering fool - without even bothering to shift into 2nd gear.
I personally can't wait for when 'Spaffer' Johnson
finally decides to crawl out of hiding from under his rock. He's going to get absolutely anihilated by Starmer.
Week in.
Week out.
You have got a crystal ball then?
You don't need a crystal ball. BJ has the intellect of a grounded and oxygen starved lump fish.
As does DC, MH, MG, PP and JRM.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 10:42 pm
by Max B Gold
Disoriented wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 10:26 pm
Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 3:03 pm
Lovejoy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 2:26 pm
You have got a crystal ball then?
You don't need a crystal ball. BJ has the intellect of a grounded and oxygen starved lump fish.
As does DC, MH, MG, PP and JRM.
Thats a bit racist.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 7:39 am
by Disoriented
Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 10:42 pm
Disoriented wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 10:26 pm
Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 3:03 pm
You don't need a crystal ball. BJ has the intellect of a grounded and oxygen starved lump fish.
As does DC, MH, MG, PP and JRM.
Thats a bit racist.
Eh?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 10:44 am
by Mikero
It is offensive to Lump Fish.
Mikero
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 11:08 am
by o-no
Disoriented wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 10:26 pm
Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 3:03 pm
Lovejoy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 2:26 pm
You have got a crystal ball then?
You don't need a crystal ball. BJ has the intellect of a grounded and oxygen starved lump fish.
As does DC, MH, MG, PP and JRM.
No, these people aren't idiots, they're strategically stupid - in other words, they act the way they do because they know it will appeal to the people who give them the votes they need.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 8:49 pm
by Disoriented
o-no wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 11:08 am
Disoriented wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 10:26 pm
Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 3:03 pm
You don't need a crystal ball. BJ has the intellect of a grounded and oxygen starved lump fish.
As does DC, MH, MG, PP and JRM.
No, these people aren't idiots, they're strategically stupid - in other words, they act the way they do because they know it will appeal to the people who give them the votes they need.
Too many I’m afraid.
For now.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 7:24 am
by o-no
True. I don't see it changing though.
Under resource the education system, add an anti-intellectual proud-and-dumb instant gratification culture that values screens over books, mix in a corporately controlled media, and you have the perfect conditions for a compliant electorate who will pretty much do as they're told
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 10:56 am
by Currywurst and Chips
North Korea now ahead of Labour on female leaders
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 2:57 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
We usually choose the best person for the job, regardless of gender. Are you a fan of North Korea?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:47 pm
by faldO
ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 2:57 pm
We usually choose the best person for the job, regardless of gender. Are you a fan of North Korea?
So Labour don't use all-women shortlists?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 4:36 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 2:57 pm
We usually choose the best person for the job, regardless of gender. Are you a fan of North Korea?
So no women were good enough in 120 years
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 4:55 pm
by Dunners
Applying that logic, not many of their men were either.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 5:12 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Dunners wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 4:55 pm
Applying that logic, not many of their men were either.
Well obvs, it's the Labour Party
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 5:33 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
Digby Chicken Caesar wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 4:36 pm
ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 2:57 pm
We usually choose the best person for the job, regardless of gender. Are you a fan of North Korea?
So no women were good enough in 120 years
Obviously not!
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 5:34 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
faldO wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:47 pm
ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 2:57 pm
We usually choose the best person for the job, regardless of gender. Are you a fan of North Korea?
So Labour don't use all-women shortlists?
Of course they do, but for parliamentary constituencies, not for electing a leader
