Page 5 of 5

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:39 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
Max B Gold wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:31 pm
Thor wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:02 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:09 pm

Desecrating the grave of a Jewish man is one point of view I suppose. Didn't have you down as an Anti-Semite.
It was a joke max. I do object to people who vandalise, steal i absolutely hate those types of behaviour.
What's funny about desecrating the grave of a Jewish man? I'm not laughing. You need to get a grip this is all going TTM.
Do you believe desecrating the grave of a Jewish man, is worse that desicrating the grave of a non Jewish man Max?
If so, why?

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:00 pm
by Max B Gold
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:39 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:31 pm
Thor wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:02 pm

It was a joke max. I do object to people who vandalise, steal i absolutely hate those types of behaviour.
What's funny about desecrating the grave of a Jewish man? I'm not laughing. You need to get a grip this is all going TTM.
Do you believe desecrating the grave of a Jewish man, is worse that desicrating the grave of a non Jewish man Max?
If so, why?
The question is imbecillic but I will answer it anyway.

No. I'm against the desecration of all graves and it doesn't really matter what I believe one way or the other.

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:37 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
Max B Gold wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:00 pm
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:39 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:31 pm

What's funny about desecrating the grave of a Jewish man? I'm not laughing. You need to get a grip this is all going TTM.
Do you believe desecrating the grave of a Jewish man, is worse that desicrating the grave of a non Jewish man Max?
If so, why?
The question is imbecillic but I will answer it anyway.

No. I'm against the desecration of all graves and it doesn't really matter what I believe one way or the other.
Then why did you include the word Jewish? That's anti Semitic. You thought your point would carry more weight of you said Jewish man instead of man.
That's anti Semitism all day long .

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:39 pm
by Stowaway
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:37 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:00 pm
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:39 pm
Do you believe desecrating the grave of a Jewish man, is worse that desicrating the grave of a non Jewish man Max?
If so, why?
The question is imbecillic but I will answer it anyway.

No. I'm against the desecration of all graves and it doesn't really matter what I believe one way or the other.
Then why did you include the word Jewish? That's anti Semitic. You thought your point would carry more weight of you said Jewish man instead of man.
That's anti Semitism all day long .
You fall for it every time, don’t you? You daft tw*t.

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:42 pm
by SvenO
Statue Lives Matter
#SLM

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 7:14 pm
by Max B Gold
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:37 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:00 pm
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 5:39 pm
Do you believe desecrating the grave of a Jewish man, is worse that desicrating the grave of a non Jewish man Max?
If so, why?
The question is imbecillic but I will answer it anyway.

No. I'm against the desecration of all graves and it doesn't really matter what I believe one way or the other.
Then why did you include the word Jewish? That's anti Semitic. You thought your point would carry more weight of you said Jewish man instead of man.
That's anti Semitism all day long .
Hmm - let me think.

Oh I know. Was it because Thor was talking about smashing up the Karl Marx statue, perhaps forgetting that it is actually placed on his grave and that Karl was Jewish?

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 7:20 pm
by SvenO
Max B Gold wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 7:14 pm
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:37 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:00 pm

The question is imbecillic but I will answer it anyway.

No. I'm against the desecration of all graves and it doesn't really matter what I believe one way or the other.
Then why did you include the word Jewish? That's anti Semitic. You thought your point would carry more weight of you said Jewish man instead of man.
That's anti Semitism all day long .
Hmm - let me think.

Oh I know. Was it because Thor was talking about smashing up the Karl Marx statue, perhaps forgetting that it is actually placed on his grave and that Karl was Jewish?
Can we desecrate slave owners graves now?
Cool👌

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2022 8:11 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Interested in what people think of this
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/ ... ting-house

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2022 9:02 pm
by Long slender neck
Its a statue by a bad man, where as Colston was of a bad man. Its wrong way to go about things and find it bizarre they haven't been stopped.

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2022 10:52 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Apple Wumble wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 8:11 pm Interested in what people think of this
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/ ... ting-house
This is disgusting.

They should go through the proper channels if they want it removed. State their case and let people have a vote on it, not take matters into their own hands.

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 11:24 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 10:52 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 8:11 pm Interested in what people think of this
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/ ... ting-house
This is disgusting.

They should go through the proper channels if they want it removed. State their case and let people have a vote on it, not take matters into their own hands.
:D

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 11:54 am
by Real Al
Apple Wumble wrote: Thu Jan 13, 2022 11:24 am
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 10:52 pm
Apple Wumble wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 8:11 pm Interested in what people think of this
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/ ... ting-house
This is disgusting.

They should go through the proper channels if they want it removed. State their case and let people have a vote on it, not take matters into their own hands.
:D
I wonder if there's any mention on this bloke's social media about Defund the BBC

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 11:56 am
by Dunners
I think we should just tear down every statue, irrespective of whether they are considered to be a goody or a bady. It's the only way to be sure. The Taliban had the right idea.

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 12:32 pm
by Long slender neck
Has anyone torn down the statue of Wacko Jacko at craven cottage yet?

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 12:53 pm
by Smendrick Feaselberg
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Jan 13, 2022 12:32 pm Has anyone torn down the statue of Wacko Jacko at craven cottage yet?
Sorry for going all Sid Bishop, but according to Wiki...

"The statue was moved to the National Football Museum in Manchester in May 2014.[9] On 6 March 2019, the statue was removed from the National Football Museum"

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 1:05 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Thu Jan 13, 2022 12:32 pm Has anyone torn down the statue of Wacko Jacko at craven cottage yet?
Racist silly sausage.

Just can’t help yourself, can you? 😡

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 5:16 pm
by StillSpike
Dunners wrote: Thu Jan 13, 2022 11:56 am I think we should just tear down every statue, irrespective of whether they are considered to be a goody or a bady. It's the only way to be sure. The Taliban had the right idea.
Should just make all statues out of ice. If someone is really good & popular then they can just keep remaking the statue of them each day (less frequently in the winter) - this might also encourage the great and the good to double their efforts to combat global warming.

If they fall out of favour, just leave the puddle to evaporate.

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:26 am
by SvenO
Any one asking for removal of a state should have to pay for safe removal, dont think this is a priority for public money.
They can use kickstarter.

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 12:34 pm
by Thor
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 9:02 pm Its a statue by a bad man, where as Colston was of a bad man. Its wrong way to go about things and find it bizarre they haven't been stopped.
I know spike posted up a really good write up of the last court case however, I bet most people just see the courts decision as a green light to do what you want to statues you don't agree with.

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 12:38 pm
by SvenO
Thor wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 12:34 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 9:02 pm Its a statue by a bad man, where as Colston was of a bad man. Its wrong way to go about things and find it bizarre they haven't been stopped.
I know spike posted up a really good write up of the last court case however, I bet most people just see the courts decision as a green light to do what you want to statues you don't agree with.
Statues are fair game now, who else owned slaves and has a statue? Are there any graves?

Re: Protecting Statues

Posted: Fri May 26, 2023 9:53 am
by Max Fowler
You seemed to have morals as far back as January 22, bera.