Protecting Statues
Moderator: Long slender neck
- ComeOnYouOs
- Regular
- Posts: 3841
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:22 pm
- Awards: Colossal berk
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 1054 times
Protecting Statues
The Government are to bring in new laws to protect statues.
So...... We have the worst pandemic for 100 years, and we have all sorts of problems with Brexit, but this government think protecting statues is something they should spend time on.
Nice to see they have their priorities right
So...... We have the worst pandemic for 100 years, and we have all sorts of problems with Brexit, but this government think protecting statues is something they should spend time on.
Nice to see they have their priorities right
- StillSpike
- Regular
- Posts: 4187
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 pm
- Has thanked: 519 times
- Been thanked: 1204 times
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2273
- Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2019 7:09 am
- Has thanked: 2003 times
- Been thanked: 269 times
Re: Protecting Statues
Reminds me of some of our defenders past and present, they were protected.ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sun Jan 17, 2021 8:16 pm The Government are to bring in new laws to protect statues.
So...... We have the worst pandemic for 100 years, and we have all sorts of problems with Brexit, but this government think protecting statues is something they should spend time on.
Nice to see they have their priorities right
- The Mindsweep
- Regular
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:50 pm
- Location: Bravos
- Has thanked: 167 times
- Been thanked: 783 times
Re: Protecting Statues
Plays well to their base. The Coulson one was the subject of years of campaigning to get rid of, they should have thanked those responsible for saving the authorities a few bob.
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10596
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4588 times
- Been thanked: 3270 times
Re: Protecting Statues
The bronze for the forehead alone must be worth a fortuneThe Mindsweep wrote: ↑Sun Jan 17, 2021 9:12 pm Plays well to their base. The Coulson one was the subject of years of campaigning to get rid of, they should have thanked those responsible for saving the authorities a few bob.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14375
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2531 times
- Been thanked: 3318 times
Re: Protecting Statues
What's the left version of a gammon?ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sun Jan 17, 2021 8:16 pm The Government are to bring in new laws to protect statues.
So...... We have the worst pandemic for 100 years, and we have all sorts of problems with Brexit, but this government think protecting statues is something they should spend time on.
Nice to see they have their priorities right
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2273
- Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2019 7:09 am
- Has thanked: 2003 times
- Been thanked: 269 times
Re: Protecting Statues
Hahahahaha , good one!Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sun Jan 17, 2021 10:16 pmWhat's the left version of a gammon?ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sun Jan 17, 2021 8:16 pm The Government are to bring in new laws to protect statues.
So...... We have the worst pandemic for 100 years, and we have all sorts of problems with Brexit, but this government think protecting statues is something they should spend time on.
Nice to see they have their priorities right
A delicate, over-sensitive, fragile, Snowflake?
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Protecting Statues
Snowflake.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sun Jan 17, 2021 10:16 pmWhat's the left version of a gammon?ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sun Jan 17, 2021 8:16 pm The Government are to bring in new laws to protect statues.
So...... We have the worst pandemic for 100 years, and we have all sorts of problems with Brexit, but this government think protecting statues is something they should spend time on.
Nice to see they have their priorities right
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Protecting Statues
I thought Trump & co in America were all moaning snowflakesOiram wrote: ↑Sun Jan 17, 2021 10:59 pmHahahahaha , good one!Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sun Jan 17, 2021 10:16 pmWhat's the left version of a gammon?ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sun Jan 17, 2021 8:16 pm The Government are to bring in new laws to protect statues.
So...... We have the worst pandemic for 100 years, and we have all sorts of problems with Brexit, but this government think protecting statues is something they should spend time on.
Nice to see they have their priorities right
A delicate, over-sensitive, fragile, Snowflake?
Cos he lost the election & they couldnt handle it ?
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
- ComeOnYouOs
- Regular
- Posts: 3841
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:22 pm
- Awards: Colossal berk
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 1054 times
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14375
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2531 times
- Been thanked: 3318 times
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2671
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:54 pm
- Has thanked: 1032 times
- Been thanked: 925 times
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12586
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2580 times
Re: Protecting Statues
IMO, they were guilty of criminal damage . By all means remove the statue if that's what people wish but it should have been done through a local referendum . That way the whole community could have had a say . At the same time as the referendum there could have been a questionnaire on who's statute the council could replace it with. If the result was to get rid of the Coulson statue then the council could have taken it down safely and properly . I think it's now open season because a precedent has been set . Maybe the Irish community should attack the Oliver Cromwell statue now because apparently you can get away with that sort of thing scot free.
Last edited by RedDwarf 1881 on Thu Jan 06, 2022 8:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12586
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2580 times
Re: Protecting Statues
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 8:46 am IMO, they were guilty of criminal damage . By all means remove the statue if that's what people wish but it should have been done through a local referendum . That way the whole community could have had a say . At the same time as the referendum there could have been a questionnaire on who's statute the council could replace it with. If the result was to get rid of the Coulson statue then the council could have taken it down safely and properly . I think it's now open season because a precedent has been set . Maybe the Irish community should attack the Oliver Cromwell statue now because apparently you can get away with that sort of thing scot free.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14375
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2531 times
- Been thanked: 3318 times
Re: Protecting Statues
So even though there is video evidence and the people on trial dont deny tearing down the statue, how can they be not guilty?
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12586
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2580 times
Re: Protecting Statues
I don't know. All I know is there's a right and wrong way to do things and now a precedent has been set.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:04 am So even though there is video evidence and the people on trial dont deny tearing down the statue, how can they be not guilty?
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2021 9:37 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Protecting Statues
A dangerous precident has been set.
The jury either had learning difficulties, were afraid of reprocussions or were far left lunatics themselves.
Just because you don't agree with something doesn't mean it's OK to vandalise it. They should be in jail, but it's a victory for the far left anarchists. You learn from history, you don't destroy it.
The jury either had learning difficulties, were afraid of reprocussions or were far left lunatics themselves.
Just because you don't agree with something doesn't mean it's OK to vandalise it. They should be in jail, but it's a victory for the far left anarchists. You learn from history, you don't destroy it.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14375
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2531 times
- Been thanked: 3318 times
Re: Protecting Statues
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... d-in-court
Some other examples of Jurys clearing crusties in court. Thin end of a wedge I think.
Some other examples of Jurys clearing crusties in court. Thin end of a wedge I think.
- The Mindsweep
- Regular
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:50 pm
- Location: Bravos
- Has thanked: 167 times
- Been thanked: 783 times
Re: Protecting Statues
So, shall we get rid of jurys and let Twitter etc decide?
The real crime here is the fact that the statue was allowed to stay in place for years after the facts around him became widely known.
The real crime here is the fact that the statue was allowed to stay in place for years after the facts around him became widely known.
- The Mindsweep
- Regular
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:50 pm
- Location: Bravos
- Has thanked: 167 times
- Been thanked: 783 times
Re: Protecting Statues
So, if you have a problem with historical institutional racism and the Slave Trade then you are a far left anarchist?Mr Wonderful wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:21 am A dangerous precident has been set.
The jury either had learning difficulties, were afraid of reprocussions or were far left lunatics themselves.
Just because you don't agree with something doesn't mean it's OK to vandalise it. They should be in jail, but it's a victory for the far left anarchists. You learn from history, you don't destroy it.
We all know who and what Colston was and removing a monument to him, no matter how, is morally correct.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14375
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2531 times
- Been thanked: 3318 times
Re: Protecting Statues
Did residents campaign to take it down earlier?The Mindsweep wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:35 am So, shall we get rid of jurys and let Twitter etc decide?
The real crime here is the fact that the statue was allowed to stay in place for years after the facts around him became widely known.
- The Mindsweep
- Regular
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:50 pm
- Location: Bravos
- Has thanked: 167 times
- Been thanked: 783 times
Re: Protecting Statues
I don't know. What do you mean by "residents"?Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:43 amDid residents campaign to take it down earlier?The Mindsweep wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:35 am So, shall we get rid of jurys and let Twitter etc decide?
The real crime here is the fact that the statue was allowed to stay in place for years after the facts around him became widely known.