Page 5 of 10
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 1:57 pm
by Long slender neck
Still alive then?
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 11:05 pm
by E10EU
CEB wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:19 am
We can only assume that Kate f***ed the Royal that died, Will shot him and then battered Kate into a coma.
There’s nothing else that makes any sense
I suspect she had cosmetic surgery. After 3 children, maybe she thought a tummy tuck would help with appearing glamorous and to stop Will's eyes from roving.
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 12:17 am
by Proposition Joe
Wills has killed her.
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 2:37 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 6:10 am
by Long slender neck
Probably had a finger transplant after all that pegging.
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 6:34 am
by Dunners
Oh wow. Just when I feared this was going to arrive at at dull outcome.
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 6:38 am
by Dunners
I really don't want to get carried away with this, but isn't it about time for the police to start digging up the patio?
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 7:24 am
by The Mindsweep
First they came for his Mum
Then they came for his Wife
They're still working on his brother
Who's next?
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 7:50 am
by CEB
It’s all very weird.
Trying to think of a likely dull outcome, as a dull outcome is still most likely.
Maybe there’s a stuffy resistance to the idea that a photo could be released showing her in anything but great health, so the palace mocked something up from a couple of photos, maybe one with Kate, one without?
Though as we’ve seen in recent years, the Royals are excellent at combining malicious contempt with baffling stupidity, so who knows?
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 7:51 am
by CEB
I mean, if she’s in as good health as she looks there, and things are all good, I’d imagine there’d be a simple solution of “can we just get a two minute video message of you and Wills?” to shut it all down
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:03 am
by Hoover Attack
What is the issue with the photo?
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:23 am
by Give it to Jabo
People do like gossip and rumour; conspiracy rumour even better. Must admit, I am a shade intrigued.
The sooner Martin Ling sorts it out the better.
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:24 am
by Give it to Jabo
according to Mrs GITJ, Kate is having a prolonged sulk..
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:29 am
by CEB
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:03 am
What is the issue with the photo?
Lots of issues with photo manipulation, most likely due to combining various iterations of the same photo and automatically combining them or badly photoshopping them
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:36 am
by Constanza
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:03 am
What is the issue with the photo?
The state of the paintwork on those windows. Would have thought the Royals could have afforded masking tape and employ a handyman who knows the concept of cutting in.
I'm just glad I moved and don't pay taxes in UK any more to fund these charlatans.
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:45 am
by Yanzi Gravy
The Mindsweep wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 7:24 am
First they came for his Mum
Then they came for his Wife
They're still working on his brother
Who's next?
Backstairs Billy and the Equerry with the big Willy.
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:23 am
by Dunners
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:03 am
What is the issue with the photo?
Just after it was released by Buckingham Palace, people started noticing weird details that suggested it was manipulated at a minimum (either through AI or poor editing of a composite). The former theory is ridiculous (so far, at least), and the latter is more likely.
But then the main photo agencies used by most media issued a Kill Notification on the use of the images, instructing media outlets to cease using them and to delete them from their online spaces. The reason given was that they had reason to believe that their source (by which they actually mean Buckingham Palace) had deliberately manipulated the image.
This was a joke online thing up until now, but by this happening, all of a sudden it's a major news story. The thing is, if the photo is a poor quality composite, as embarrassing as that may be for the Palace, it's a straightforward and believable explanation and one that would be widely accepted. So what's fuelling speculation now is the deafening silence from the Palace.
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:28 am
by Currywurst and Chips
Comes to something when the chief Lizards don’t even control the mainstream media any more
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:28 am
by CEB
Yes. It’s the initial carelessness of “meh, it’s fine” which could have all manner of innocent explanations, to the sudden circling of the wagons.
As someone who gives not a single f*i* about the royals, it’s very funny seeing the warring factions on social media, with plenty of “LOL as if Harry doesn’t have his hairline photoshopped, and Meghan totes uses filters all the time the ugly bitch”, which seems to miss the point somewhat
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:52 am
by Hoover Attack
Dunners wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:23 am
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:03 am
What is the issue with the photo?
Just after it was released by Buckingham Palace, people started noticing weird details that suggested it was manipulated at a minimum (either through AI or poor editing of a composite). The former theory is ridiculous (so far, at least), and the latter is more likely.
But then the main photo agencies used by most media issued a Kill Notification on the use of the images, instructing media outlets to cease using them and to delete them from their online spaces. The reason given was that they had reason to believe that their source (by which they actually mean Buckingham Palace) had deliberately manipulated the image.
This was a joke online thing up until now, but by this happening, all of a sudden it's a major news story. The thing is, if the photo is a poor quality composite, as embarrassing as that may be for the Palace, it's a straightforward and believable explanation and one that would be widely accepted. So what's fuelling speculation now is the deafening silence from the Palace.
Lizzie's hooves were airbrushed out of every single photo of her and people are querying whether the Palace use photoshop or not?
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:53 am
by Long slender neck
Never complain, never explain.
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 10:00 am
by Hoover Attack
In human form one should always remain.
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 10:09 am
by CEB
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:52 am
Dunners wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:23 am
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 8:03 am
What is the issue with the photo?
Just after it was released by Buckingham Palace, people started noticing weird details that suggested it was manipulated at a minimum (either through AI or poor editing of a composite). The former theory is ridiculous (so far, at least), and the latter is more likely.
But then the main photo agencies used by most media issued a Kill Notification on the use of the images, instructing media outlets to cease using them and to delete them from their online spaces. The reason given was that they had reason to believe that their source (by which they actually mean Buckingham Palace) had deliberately manipulated the image.
This was a joke online thing up until now, but by this happening, all of a sudden it's a major news story. The thing is, if the photo is a poor quality composite, as embarrassing as that may be for the Palace, it's a straightforward and believable explanation and one that would be widely accepted. So what's fuelling speculation now is the deafening silence from the Palace.
Lizzie's hooves were airbrushed out of every single photo of her and people are querying whether the Palace use photoshop or not?
Eh? Is this a thing?
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 10:11 am
by Long slender neck
Why are they all laughing in the photo? Their posh faces make me feel sick.
Re: King Charles III Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 10:31 am
by Proposition Joe
Long slender neck wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 10:11 am
Why are they all laughing in the photo?
You'd do whatever you were told when you're being held at gunpoint.