Paul v Tyson

[Captain Zep]

What's this all about? Remember the old days when we'd watch professionals at the the top of their game?

Tyson is nearly 60 but 3/1 to beat a YouTuber, can that be right?

[RBMarshall]

WTF! Serrano robbed. What were the judges on?

[RBMarshall]

Proving the bookies are rarely wrong . You can't fight at 58 without legs.
Enjoy the 20 mill Mike.

[Bandy Legs]

WTF! Serrano robbed. What were the judges on?

How was Serrano robbed?
Taylor beat her up, more accurate scoring points & used her head exceptionally well.

[Currywurst and Chips]

Glad I didn’t stay up for the circus main event and croooed decision against Serrano again

[Bandy Legs]

Glad I didn’t stay up for the circus main event and croooed decision against Serrano again

What's a Croooed decision?

[Currywurst and Chips]

Croooed sport at times

[Bandy Legs]

at the above

https://www.secondsout.com/news/katie-t ... scorecard/
An Independent boxing magazine vs a disgruntled
losers opinion.
Landing punches on the arms doesn't equal landing punches to the head

Taylor wins 5 rounds Serrano 4 rounds with a Drawn 9-9 round that Taylor won but had a point deducted.
How is that Croooed?

[Currywurst and Chips]

Never heard of them, irrelevant

[Bandy Legs]

You not being knowledgeable is Irrelevant
95-94 x 3 means Taylor is 2-0 v The bad loser

[Proposition Joe]

The Guardian had Serrano 95-94 so perhaps all the independent viewers didn't think it was that unanimous.

[Bandy Legs]

Independent viewers aren't important.
Seconds out concentrate purely on boxing & not world news. Would be good if you could post the Guardians scorecard though just for reference though.
We Could compare it to the 3 judges scorecards

[Proposition Joe]

Independent viewers aren't important.
Seconds out concentrate purely on boxing & not world news. Would be good if you could post the Guardians scorecard though just for reference though.
We Could compare it to the 3 judges scorecards

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/live/ ... acb4f00a1e

On the same minute by minute coverage prior to Tyson - Paul.

[Bandy Legs]

Independent viewers aren't important.
Seconds out concentrate purely on boxing & not world news. Would be good if you could post the Guardians scorecard though just for reference though.
We Could compare it to the 3 judges scorecards

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/live/ ... acb4f00a1e

On the same minute by minute coverage prior to Tyson - Paul.

So an American reporter scored the win for Serrano, while 2 American Judges & 1 Canadian judge scored it a Unanimous win for Taylor. They are the Important viewers & the rest of us have opinions.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/boxing/articles/cje0n0qy9xlo

Still doesn't prove the fight was Croooed though as was stated originally.

[Proposition Joe]

Doesn't prove anything, of course. Was just sharing an opinion I'd seen.

[Bandy Legs]

That's fair enough, I'm just sharing mine.

[Adz]

I watched the Tyson Paul fight. Looked like a standard exhibition job where Paul would have won easy if he wanted to, and Tyson was shot after 5 minutes.

[Stan1972]

Paul v Tyson was an embarrassment, Tyson should not be allowed to get back in a ring again.
You can’t even call it a fight, it was very sad to watch.
Tyson could just about walk, watching him slowly shuffling back to his corner every 2mins, was very sad.