How do you upload images to this message board?

[The Reverend]

Reverend, I think you should stop posting about ceb. If ceb were then to continue liking your posts then I'd consider that a form of harassment and take action.

A very fair ruling. Would continuing to mention me directly or indirectly also fall into the harassment category or am I permitted to defend myself in these instances?

[CEB]

You should probably hope it doesn’t constitute harassment to “indirectly” mention someone in the hope of getting a reaction…

You need someone to pick up the balls whilst the squad players are warming up

Straight in there like the snidey little scrote you are. Well done.

A random account which barely ever posts who has never engaged with me before going straight in with some premeditated personal abuse.

Make of that what you will.

The phrase “cry bully” springs to mind

[The Reverend]

You should probably hope it doesn’t constitute harassment to “indirectly” mention someone in the hope of getting a reaction…

Straight in there like the snidey little scrote you are. Well done.

A random account which barely ever posts who has never engaged with me before going straight in with some premeditated personal abuse.

Make of that what you will.

The phrase “cry bully” springs to mind

getting in your last desperate attempts before LSN confirms that continuing to mention me and goad me into a response is also harassment, along with the other harassing behaviour of yours which he has been very clear about.

[Long slender neck]

Reverend, I think you should stop posting about ceb. If ceb were then to continue liking your posts then I'd consider that a form of harassment and take action.

A very fair ruling. Would continuing to mention me directly or indirectly also fall into the harassment category or am I permitted to defend myself in these instances?

I'm not going to ban you from talking to each other. But if either party says that a certain behaviour is unwanted and it continues after having asked it to stop, then thats harassment isnt it?

[Dunners]

But what if, in a hypothetical situation, CEB does happen to genuinely like one of Rev's posts?

[The Reverend]

Reverend, I think you should stop posting about ceb. If ceb were then to continue liking your posts then I'd consider that a form of harassment and take action.

A very fair ruling. Would continuing to mention me directly or indirectly also fall into the harassment category or am I permitted to defend myself in these instances?

I'm not going to ban you from talking to each other. But if either party says that a certain behaviour is unwanted and it continues after having asked it to stop, then thats harassment isnt it?

Also fair. I consider constantly using old threads for weeks ago to mention me and have digs at me as unwanted behaviour, which I don’t think is unreasonable to raise with you.

For the foreseeable future I’m not going to reference CEB directly outside of this thread. I’d consider him not doing the same as unwarranted. In cases where he does it in snide ways which I think are indirect references to me I’ll report them with the reason why I think they are referring to me.

Is this fair?

[CEB]

You need someone to pick up the balls whilst the squad players are warming up

Straight in there like the snidey little scrote you are. Well done.

A random account which barely ever posts who has never engaged with me before going straight in with some premeditated personal abuse.

Make of that what you will.

Is this what you mean by “referring indirectly”, Rev?

Cos it seems to me that if, after making “CEB uses aliases to harass me!” the hill you want to die on, starting threads and accusing me regularly and not backing down, then posts like this would seem to be a pretty good example of using an indirect means of continuing a conflict. Especially since you have doubled down even today on “CEB has aliases!!!”

Maybe, just maybe, a good idea is that if an account strikes you as suspicious, you report it rather than publicly implying I’m harassing you then using as justification for whatever it is you’re doing?

[CEB]

Rev: “Don’t use old threads to have digs at me”

also Rev: “your posting history and arguing tells me that I’m right to repeatedly attempt to get you banned!!”


Is there anything at all that you don’t have double standards on?

[The Reverend]

Straight in there like the snidey little scrote you are. Well done.

A random account which barely ever posts who has never engaged with me before going straight in with some premeditated personal abuse.

Make of that what you will.

a good idea is that if an account strikes you as suspicious, you report it rather than publicly implying I’m harassing you

Hahahahaha

Now I know you’re just trolling

[CEB]

But what if, in a hypothetical situation, CEB does happen to genuinely like one of Rev's posts?

I’m just amazed that Rev realised I was using likes as a form of passive aggressiveness. Conkles still hasn’t realised

[Long slender neck]

But what if, in a hypothetical situation, CEB does happen to genuinely like one of Rev's posts?

Then we're in unchartered waters

[CEB]

Can confirm - if I “like” one of Rev’s posts after he shuts the f*** up about me, unless it’s to say

“Sorry CEB, I realise that you aren’t B.Whitehouse, that was a mistake and restarting a feud with you over that is on me - no hard feelings!”

Then it will definitely be an attempt to harass him

[The Reverend]

Can confirm - if I “like” one of Rev’s posts after he shuts the f*** up about me, unless it’s to say

“Sorry CEB, I realise that you aren’t B.Whitehouse, that was a mistake and restarting a feud with you over that is on me - no hard feelings!”

Then it will definitely be an attempt to harass him

I’m pleased that LSNs very fair and balanced ruling has limited your obsessive rants to just this thread rather than trying to trash the entire board.

Back with the drafting out statements for people to make. Very odd controlling behaviour.

It didn’t work when you tried to harass LSN into doing it and if won’t work on me.

[CEB]

Mate, nobody - absolutely nobody - reading any of this crap thinks you’re anything other than an enthusiastic participant in this “feud”, probably thinks we’re both annoying, but is likely to conclude that you can dish it out but not take it.

[The Reverend]

Mate, nobody - absolutely nobody - reading any of this crap thinks you’re anything other than an enthusiastic participant in this “feud”, probably thinks we’re both annoying, but is likely to conclude that you can dish it out but not take it.

I’m fine with people thinking that.

Was a small price to pay to ensure that most people are likely see that you’re a hypocrite with an odd control fetish, which if they have read most of our exchanges is the obvious conclusion they should come to.

[CEB]

And there we have it. You’re not “harassed”, you’re just on a bit of a crusade to try to ensure everyone else dislikes me as much as you have come to, and if that fails, trying to find a way to get me banned

And it’s probably a bit frustrating for you that
A: I don’t really mind people forming whatever opinion of me they like
B: people are able to base whether they think I’m a **** or a **** on their own interactions with me, and don’t need you to help them.
C: I actively am not interested in getting you banned, and actually don’t really care what you do, as far as I’m concerned, you can do what you like

[The Reverend]

And there we have it. You’re not “harassed”, you’re just on a bit of a crusade to try to ensure everyone else dislikes me as much as you have come to.

And it’s probably a bit frustrating for you that
A: I don’t really mind people forming whatever opinion of me they like
B: people are able to base whether they think I’m a **** or a **** on their own interactions with me, and don’t need you to help them.

Having bored everyone else on this board to death with this you’ve even lost me now.

If you continue pursuing this feud beyond today on this thread I’ll suggest to LSN that it is added to list along with “digging up old threads to mention me”, “making snide nudge nudge wink wink comments about me” and using the like function in a passive aggressive way to harass me”. Because it really is unwanted behaviour now.

Because I know it’ll make you happy. And I’m sure you can chalk it down as a “win” :

Here have the last word….

[ChorizO]

And there we have it. You’re not “harassed”, you’re just on a bit of a crusade to try to ensure everyone else dislikes me as much as you have come to, and if that fails, trying to find a way to get me banned

And it’s probably a bit frustrating for you that
A: I don’t really mind people forming whatever opinion of me they like
B: people are able to base whether they think I’m a **** or a **** on their own interactions with me, and don’t need you to help them.
C: I actively am not interested in getting you banned, and actually don’t really care what you do, as far as I’m concerned, you can do what you like

Enough, surely.

[B.whitehouse+10more]

This is so enthralling

[Hoover Attack]

Why does ceb liking your posts get to you so much?

[The Reverend]

Why does ceb liking your posts get to you so much?

Because it’s indicative of the nasty manipulative behaviour he engages in.

On the public facing side of the forum he’s claiming that I’m trying to continue a feud despite the fact that I had been actively ignoring him for well over a week by that point. Yet in the background, where nobody else can see, he is liking every post I make and going back to posts from months ago to like, knowing that it’ll flood my notifications and get my attention.

His whole “why are you getting upset about someone liking your posts” line was incredibly predicable as well. It’s the same as how he claims to not understand what’s so bad about “swearing” when in fact the thing people take issue with is directly abusing other users via swearing at them.

[Proposition Joe]

Just throwing out a wild suggestion but, since he's said he's only liking your posts when you post about him (despite saying you want to ignore him and end the back and forth fued), maybe one solution that could result in him not liking your posts would be...to stop posting about him? Merely a thought.

[The Reverend]

Just throwing out a wild suggestion but, since he's said he's only liking your posts when you post about him (despite saying you want to ignore him and end the back and forth fued), maybe one solution that could result in him not liking your posts would be...to stop posting about him? Merely a thought.

Well that’s nonsense as he has been liking posts that have absolutely nothing to do with him. But I wouldn’t expect you to care about that as it doesn’t support you narrative. I suspect you’ll quickly ignore this fact as it’s inconvenient to you.

[Hoover Attack]

Why does ceb liking your posts get to you so much?

Because it’s indicative of the nasty manipulative behaviour he engages in.

On the public facing side of the forum he’s claiming that I’m trying to continue a feud despite the fact that I had been actively ignoring him for well over a week by that point. Yet in the background, where nobody else can see, he is liking every post I make and going back to posts from months ago to like, knowing that it’ll flood my notifications and get my attention.

His whole “why are you getting upset about someone liking your posts” line was incredibly predicable as well. It’s the same as how he claims to not understand what’s so bad about “swearing” when in fact the thing people take issue with is directly abusing other users via swearing at them.

Maybe he just really likes your posts?

You could turn off/ignore your notifications. I appear to have done that somehow.

[Dunners]

FFS. There I was thinking I was great at boardin' but it turns out it's just you lot harassing me.