Why Labour lost Hartlepool
Moderator: Long slender neck
- The Mindsweep
- Regular
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:50 pm
- Location: Bravos
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 836 times
Why Labour lost Hartlepool
This sums it up. Old bloke blames his parents and grandparents for voting Labour, now is grown-up and works things out for himself.
Blames Labour for poor facilities at hospital, no police cells and no police. It's obvious he believes that the local MP is solely responsible for everything.
Blames Labour for poor facilities at hospital, no police cells and no police. It's obvious he believes that the local MP is solely responsible for everything.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6014
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5845 times
- Been thanked: 1089 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
Labour lost at Hartlepool because the Conservatives got more votes than they did, simple innit !
I hope that Labour keep the nice, anonymous grey man as their leader for a long, long time yet.
I dont want that Andy Burnham made leader, he might well win !
I hope that Labour keep the nice, anonymous grey man as their leader for a long, long time yet.
I dont want that Andy Burnham made leader, he might well win !
- Admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3299
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 369 times
- Been thanked: 1154 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
Would’ve been nice if the interviewer had pointed out that he’s just voted for the party whose cuts are behind why most of hartlepools local services have gone.The Mindsweep wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 4:18 pm This sums it up. Old bloke blames his parents and grandparents for voting Labour, now is grown-up and works things out for himself.
Blames Labour for poor facilities at hospital, no police cells and no police. It's obvious he believes that the local MP is solely responsible for everything.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:21 pm
- Has thanked: 339 times
- Been thanked: 373 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
Interesting take by Professor John Curtice, reckon he’s not far off the mark as usual ………
Polling guru Sir John Curtice has said Labour’s strategy to “say as little as possible” and “not to talk about Brexit” has meant the party are no longer appealing to voters in their traditional heartlands and not just Vote Leave backers.
Professor Curtice said the party’s landslide Hartlepool by-election loss today was partly down to Leave voters preferring the Conservatives to Labour.
But he pointed out the party’s share of the vote was also down nine points, meaning Labour’s core voters are deserting the party as well.
He added: “It’s the party that likes to think of itself as the party of working class voters. Well actually more working class voters, voted Conservative than Labour in 2019. “Labour either have to work out a strategy for reclaiming the working class despite Brexit, or does it have to accept that actually these days the Labour party is the party of young people, of university graduates, of social liberals, the kind of people who live in London where Labour is probably going to do well. And that’s a big existential question facing the Labour party.”
Polling guru Sir John Curtice has said Labour’s strategy to “say as little as possible” and “not to talk about Brexit” has meant the party are no longer appealing to voters in their traditional heartlands and not just Vote Leave backers.
Professor Curtice said the party’s landslide Hartlepool by-election loss today was partly down to Leave voters preferring the Conservatives to Labour.
But he pointed out the party’s share of the vote was also down nine points, meaning Labour’s core voters are deserting the party as well.
He added: “It’s the party that likes to think of itself as the party of working class voters. Well actually more working class voters, voted Conservative than Labour in 2019. “Labour either have to work out a strategy for reclaiming the working class despite Brexit, or does it have to accept that actually these days the Labour party is the party of young people, of university graduates, of social liberals, the kind of people who live in London where Labour is probably going to do well. And that’s a big existential question facing the Labour party.”
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:04 am
- Has thanked: 85 times
- Been thanked: 219 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
Long live corruption and ineptitudeSid Bishop wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 4:23 pm Labour lost at Hartlepool because the Conservatives got more votes than they did, simple innit !
I hope that Labour keep the nice, anonymous grey man as their leader for a long, long time yet.
I dont want that Andy Burnham made leader, he might well win !
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
This is almost too perfect
Labour lost because the thick white northerners didn't know what they were voting for. Well done on finding two white guys and saying THEY ARE the reason Labour lost. As if they represent Hartlepool
5 years and you still don't get it but please keep it up.
Labour lost because the thick white northerners didn't know what they were voting for. Well done on finding two white guys and saying THEY ARE the reason Labour lost. As if they represent Hartlepool
5 years and you still don't get it but please keep it up.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2989
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
- Has thanked: 311 times
- Been thanked: 668 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
It’s Labour who sadly don’t get it. Times are changing, Labour needs to change with the times. Labour didn’t lose because of these two guys. The majority was much bigger.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 5:35 pm This is almost too perfect
Labour lost because the thick white northerners didn't know what they were voting for. Well done on finding two white guys and saying THEY ARE the reason Labour lost. As if they represent Hartlepool
5 years and you still don't get it but please keep it up.
- Millennial Snowflake
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:50 pm
- Has thanked: 528 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
His first point is valid though isn't it?
Many working class voters were brought up by their parents and grandparents to vote Labour because they represented the working classes. But people can think for themselves and thinking you own the vote of certain sections of the population comes to cost you dearly, as Labour have found out
Many working class voters were brought up by their parents and grandparents to vote Labour because they represented the working classes. But people can think for themselves and thinking you own the vote of certain sections of the population comes to cost you dearly, as Labour have found out
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1581
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:21 pm
- Has thanked: 243 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
How many of the ‘working class’ can look at some of the Labour Party and think that they can understand and represent them?Millennial Snowflake wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 7:14 pm His first point is valid though isn't it?
Many working class voters were brought up by their parents and grandparents to vote Labour because they represented the working classes. But people can think for themselves and thinking you own the vote of certain sections of the population comes to cost you dearly, as Labour have found out
Some of them are more loaded than the Tory MPs, send their kids to private schools etc.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4574
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 944 times
- Been thanked: 992 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
What about the times do they need to get with?Dohnut wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 6:49 pmIt’s Labour who sadly don’t get it. Times are changing, Labour needs to change with the times. Labour didn’t lose because of these two guys. The majority was much bigger.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 5:35 pm This is almost too perfect
Labour lost because the thick white northerners didn't know what they were voting for. Well done on finding two white guys and saying THEY ARE the reason Labour lost. As if they represent Hartlepool
5 years and you still don't get it but please keep it up.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
But when you get someone with ‘working class roots’ in there, the likes of Rayner or Abbott, they’re attacked for being thick or having accents or being class traitors or whatever.Ornchurch wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 7:38 pmHow many of the ‘working class’ can look at some of the Labour Party and think that they can understand and represent them?Millennial Snowflake wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 7:14 pm His first point is valid though isn't it?
Many working class voters were brought up by their parents and grandparents to vote Labour because they represented the working classes. But people can think for themselves and thinking you own the vote of certain sections of the population comes to cost you dearly, as Labour have found out
Some of them are more loaded than the Tory MPs, send their kids to private schools etc.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:25 pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
What did Labour do 5 years ago that closed Hartlepools Hospitals & Courts ?Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 5:35 pm This is almost too perfect
Labour lost because the thick white northerners didn't know what they were voting for. Well done on finding two white guys and saying THEY ARE the reason Labour lost. As if they represent Hartlepool
5 years and you still don't get it but please keep it up.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 8:15 pm
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 160 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
What was Corbyn going to do. Nationalise the railways, spend a shed load of money, raise corporation tax. Tories have done/are doing this so what have labour to offer that is different. Churchill, a tory, our greatest PM, led the nation in a war started by his own party. Johnson, a PM leading the country against a pandemic, not started by his own party but one for which in 11 years they had not prepared for. Had a contingent supply chain been in place for ventilators etc would we have had lock down and deaths. Fortunately the vaccine drive was a success. Taxation was already increasing pre-covid but the Tories are presented as a low tax party. It is a con and the electorate fall for it due to papers like the Sun.
The Tories also come over as standing up for Britain. Like using the Navy in Jersey in a situation that should never have happened in the first place.
My own tory MP, a remainer who agreed to support Brexit. Principles? They are building a new Harlow hospital. It won't be in the town but who cares, it is a good vote catcher. Boris says cycle. The Tory Essex council built a new road through a cycle track with no provision for pedestrians. My local Essex cc councillors comments, cycle more carefully.
I am not a raving leftie, I have both right and left wing view but without an opposition the tories will p--s on most of us. Why did labour lose, the locals had a few promises made, they don't like immigrants, they like us sending in the Navy
The Tories also come over as standing up for Britain. Like using the Navy in Jersey in a situation that should never have happened in the first place.
My own tory MP, a remainer who agreed to support Brexit. Principles? They are building a new Harlow hospital. It won't be in the town but who cares, it is a good vote catcher. Boris says cycle. The Tory Essex council built a new road through a cycle track with no provision for pedestrians. My local Essex cc councillors comments, cycle more carefully.
I am not a raving leftie, I have both right and left wing view but without an opposition the tories will p--s on most of us. Why did labour lose, the locals had a few promises made, they don't like immigrants, they like us sending in the Navy
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
You know what happened to Churchills goverment after the war .Harlow wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 8:55 pm What was Corbyn going to do. Nationalise the railways, spend a shed load of money, raise corporation tax. Tories have done/are doing this so what have labour to offer that is different. Churchill, a tory, our greatest PM, led the nation in a war started by his own party. Johnson, a PM leading the country against a pandemic, not started by his own party but one for which in 11 years they had not prepared for. Had a contingent supply chain been in place for ventilators etc would we have had lock down and deaths. Fortunately the vaccine drive was a success. Taxation was already increasing pre-covid but the Tories are presented as a low tax party. It is a con and the electorate fall for it due to papers like the Sun.
The Tories also come over as standing up for Britain. Like using the Navy in Jersey in a situation that should never have happened in the first place.
My own tory MP, a remainer who agreed to support Brexit. Principles? They are building a new Harlow hospital. It won't be in the town but who cares, it is a good vote catcher. Boris says cycle. The Tory Essex council built a new road through a cycle track with no provision for pedestrians. My local Essex cc councillors comments, cycle more carefully.
I am not a raving leftie, I have both right and left wing view but without an opposition the tories will p--s on most of us. Why did labour lose, the locals had a few promises made, they don't like immigrants, they like us sending in the Navy
Heres hoping Boris follows his Hero by leading the blue flag to a crushing defeat
Against a written off Labour Party
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2989
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
- Has thanked: 311 times
- Been thanked: 668 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
If you are saying our choice is between a rock and a hard place, I agree. The last few years have delivered a number of really poor options to choose between. Trouble is Labour have been better at choosing the biggest idiots. In that, they have done well. Let’s hope Starmer breaks the trend. Politics is at a real low.Harlow wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 8:55 pm What was Corbyn going to do. Nationalise the railways, spend a shed load of money, raise corporation tax. Tories have done/are doing this so what have labour to offer that is different. Churchill, a tory, our greatest PM, led the nation in a war started by his own party. Johnson, a PM leading the country against a pandemic, not started by his own party but one for which in 11 years they had not prepared for. Had a contingent supply chain been in place for ventilators etc would we have had lock down and deaths. Fortunately the vaccine drive was a success. Taxation was already increasing pre-covid but the Tories are presented as a low tax party. It is a con and the electorate fall for it due to papers like the Sun.
The Tories also come over as standing up for Britain. Like using the Navy in Jersey in a situation that should never have happened in the first place.
My own tory MP, a remainer who agreed to support Brexit. Principles? They are building a new Harlow hospital. It won't be in the town but who cares, it is a good vote catcher. Boris says cycle. The Tory Essex council built a new road through a cycle track with no provision for pedestrians. My local Essex cc councillors comments, cycle more carefully.
I am not a raving leftie, I have both right and left wing view but without an opposition the tories will p--s on most of us. Why did labour lose, the locals had a few promises made, they don't like immigrants, they like us sending in the Navy
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:12 am
- Has thanked: 143 times
- Been thanked: 171 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
Well, today Starmer has shown himself up as a front runner in the idiots' stake.
I really would like to know who is advising him and pulling his strings.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:21 pm
- Has thanked: 339 times
- Been thanked: 373 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
It’s a good debate.
I was brought up a Labour voter and voted that way from my first eligible election in 1983 onwards, but stopped in 2010 and haven’t (yet) returned. Over a period of some years they took traditional voters for granted and got out of touch with many, me included, and it’s cost them as is especially noticeable in some traditional northern heartlands.
I voted Conservative for the first time ever in 2019, specifically to get Brexit over the line. Far too many Labour MPs did all they could to subvert the democracy of the referendum, and I take a dim view of that for above all I’m a democrat, so there is still a level of mistrust from me. Some MPs got it, Caroline Flint one who springs to mind, yet she too paid the price from the voters who had been lost over a dissatisfaction with both Brexit and Corbyn’s leadership.
I would vote Labour again but not at the moment. Too much politicking, too much banging on about subjects which most ordinary people don’t rate as a priority, too many seem in a bubble and unconnected with traditional voters. They probably need more of the likes of Andy Burnham and Angela Raynor to reconnect, especially in their traditional areas of support.
I was brought up a Labour voter and voted that way from my first eligible election in 1983 onwards, but stopped in 2010 and haven’t (yet) returned. Over a period of some years they took traditional voters for granted and got out of touch with many, me included, and it’s cost them as is especially noticeable in some traditional northern heartlands.
I voted Conservative for the first time ever in 2019, specifically to get Brexit over the line. Far too many Labour MPs did all they could to subvert the democracy of the referendum, and I take a dim view of that for above all I’m a democrat, so there is still a level of mistrust from me. Some MPs got it, Caroline Flint one who springs to mind, yet she too paid the price from the voters who had been lost over a dissatisfaction with both Brexit and Corbyn’s leadership.
I would vote Labour again but not at the moment. Too much politicking, too much banging on about subjects which most ordinary people don’t rate as a priority, too many seem in a bubble and unconnected with traditional voters. They probably need more of the likes of Andy Burnham and Angela Raynor to reconnect, especially in their traditional areas of support.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 10:48 am
- Has thanked: 345 times
- Been thanked: 360 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
Most not very well educated people ( quite a proportion ) don't see any difference between the Parties, saying they are all in it for themselves. But they see the Labour Party as being the Party that wants to bring Johnny Foreigner here in large quantities. The EU was a source of this misconception and the fact that most anti-Brexiteers were Labour supporters add grist to their mill
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
Totally. Anyone who parrots the ‘They’re all as bad as each other’ line has fallen for a deliberate ploy to discredit all politicians and therefore all Governments (thus helping those calling for less Government intervention and more private enterprise).
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
Totally. Anyone who parrots the ‘They’re all as bad as each other’ line has fallen for a deliberate ploy to discredit all politicians and therefore all Governments (thus helping those calling for less Government intervention and more private enterprise).
Same with those who can flip flop between parties. You’ve been suckered if you think a few tweaks to some policies changes anything.
Same with those who can flip flop between parties. You’ve been suckered if you think a few tweaks to some policies changes anything.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4574
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 944 times
- Been thanked: 992 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
I suppose you were ok with the Tories and the other weird brexit shaggers ‘subverting democracy’ to win the vote in the first place. You strange man.EastDerehamO wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 7:54 am It’s a good debate.
I was brought up a Labour voter and voted that way from my first eligible election in 1983 onwards, but stopped in 2010 and haven’t (yet) returned. Over a period of some years they took traditional voters for granted and got out of touch with many, me included, and it’s cost them as is especially noticeable in some traditional northern heartlands.
I voted Conservative for the first time ever in 2019, specifically to get Brexit over the line. Far too many Labour MPs did all they could to subvert the democracy of the referendum, and I take a dim view of that for above all I’m a democrat, so there is still a level of mistrust from me. Some MPs got it, Caroline Flint one who springs to mind, yet she too paid the price from the voters who had been lost over a dissatisfaction with both Brexit and Corbyn’s leadership.
I would vote Labour again but not at the moment. Too much politicking, too much banging on about subjects which most ordinary people don’t rate as a priority, too many seem in a bubble and unconnected with traditional voters. They probably need more of the likes of Andy Burnham and Angela Raynor to reconnect, especially in their traditional areas of support.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13218
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1102 times
- Been thanked: 2968 times
Re: Why Labour lost Hartlepool
What do you mean when you say you are a "democrat"?EastDerehamO wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 7:54 am It’s a good debate.
I was brought up a Labour voter and voted that way from my first eligible election in 1983 onwards, but stopped in 2010 and haven’t (yet) returned. Over a period of some years they took traditional voters for granted and got out of touch with many, me included, and it’s cost them as is especially noticeable in some traditional northern heartlands.
I voted Conservative for the first time ever in 2019, specifically to get Brexit over the line. Far too many Labour MPs did all they could to subvert the democracy of the referendum, and I take a dim view of that for above all I’m a democrat, so there is still a level of mistrust from me. Some MPs got it, Caroline Flint one who springs to mind, yet she too paid the price from the voters who had been lost over a dissatisfaction with both Brexit and Corbyn’s leadership.
I would vote Labour again but not at the moment. Too much politicking, too much banging on about subjects which most ordinary people don’t rate as a priority, too many seem in a bubble and unconnected with traditional voters. They probably need more of the likes of Andy Burnham and Angela Raynor to reconnect, especially in their traditional areas of support.
If they need more like Rayner and Burnham you are asking them to be a bit more socialist. So why vote Tory?