Page 1 of 1

Man City

Posted: Wed May 04, 2022 10:40 pm
by The Mindsweep
So glad they got dumped out. The way it happened was even sweeter.

Re: Man City

Posted: Wed May 04, 2022 10:44 pm
by PutneyO
Oh dear how sad never mind

Re: Man City

Posted: Wed May 04, 2022 10:45 pm
by kokomO
The Mindsweep wrote: Wed May 04, 2022 10:40 pm So glad they got dumped out. The way it happened was even sweeter.
Just pray they can now finish the job off in Paris......

At very least it gives us a team to cheer in the final.

Re: Man City

Posted: Wed May 04, 2022 10:47 pm
by BIGRON
So glad we don't support a team who blow it in the big games 🤔🤔

Re: Man City

Posted: Wed May 04, 2022 11:18 pm
by gshaw
Most spectacular bottle job ever from one of the most overrated managers ever
BIGRON wrote: Wed May 04, 2022 10:47 pm So glad we don't support a team who blow it in the big games 🤔🤔
Losing a 2 goal lead in 45 minutes is one thing but blowing it in stoppage time would really make you sick.

Wonder how they'll react, will it be wounded animal strikes out and demolishes the next Prem game or will the belief drain away and give the title to Liverpool?

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 6:50 am
by Orient_Man_And_Boy
Scunthorpe vs Orient

1-2 on 89 minutes, as I recall.

3-2 at FT.

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 7:21 am
by The Mindsweep
Orient_Man_And_Boy wrote: Thu May 05, 2022 6:50 am Scunthorpe vs Orient

1-2 on 89 minutes, as I recall.

3-2 at FT.
2 Oct 2021 Port Vale v Leyton Orient

86 mins Orient go 2-1 up
91 mins Vale equalise
93 mins Val get the winner

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 8:32 am
by Celtient
Pep has only spent around £1bn at City so far, so I think he's done brilliantly to get his small squad this far

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 8:54 am
by BiggsyMalone
Celtient wrote: Thu May 05, 2022 8:32 am Pep has only spent around £1bn at City so far, so I think he's done brilliantly to get his small squad this far
Similar to how brilliant Orient have done spending money over the years and ended up in the National League and now are struggling in league 2

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 9:04 am
by Celtient
I should of course mention that City have been hampered by sticking rigidly to UEFA's Financial Fair Play rules. Like Chelsea, they only spend what they earn. It's why Chelsea aren't have any problems despite no longer having the Ruski's billions pumped in every season

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 9:22 am
by Max Fowler
BiggsyMalone wrote: Thu May 05, 2022 8:54 am
Celtient wrote: Thu May 05, 2022 8:32 am Pep has only spent around £1bn at City so far, so I think he's done brilliantly to get his small squad this far
Similar to how brilliant Orient have done spending money over the years and ended up in the National League and now are struggling in league 2
It’s not really similar, is it though?

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 10:19 am
by BiggsyMalone
Gary the Plumber wrote: Thu May 05, 2022 9:22 am
BiggsyMalone wrote: Thu May 05, 2022 8:54 am
Celtient wrote: Thu May 05, 2022 8:32 am Pep has only spent around £1bn at City so far, so I think he's done brilliantly to get his small squad this far
Similar to how brilliant Orient have done spending money over the years and ended up in the National League and now are struggling in league 2
It’s not really similar, is it though?
No it isn’t. Which is why its bizarre how obsessed Orient fans are with Premier League clubs. It’s small time as f***.

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 12:07 pm
by Give it to Jabo
BiggsyMalone wrote: Thu May 05, 2022 8:54 am
Celtient wrote: Thu May 05, 2022 8:32 am Pep has only spent around £1bn at City so far, so I think he's done brilliantly to get his small squad this far
Similar to how brilliant Orient have done spending money over the years and ended up in the National League and now are struggling in league 2
I would question the term “struggling”…

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 12:12 pm
by Celtient
Hardly an obsession. Couldn't give a monkeys about any of them, yet can't help having a chuckle when it goes pear-shaped for the real big spenders.

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 5:03 pm
by WilliamTell
Never seen 22 actors on three acres of grass before.

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 6:35 pm
by BiggsyMalone
Celtient wrote: Thu May 05, 2022 12:12 pm Hardly an obsession. Couldn't give a monkeys about any of them, yet can't help having a chuckle when it goes pear-shaped for the real big spenders.
A day doesn’t go by without someone on here mentioning United, Liverpool, City, West Ham or Spurs.

Again. Orient nearly ceased existing because of bad spending. Have a word with yourself.

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 7:20 pm
by Celtient
I think your missing the part about BIG spenders

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 7:22 pm
by PutneyO
Bigsy, our owner was a criminal/lunatic, thats why Orient nearly ceased to exist.

Re: Man City

Posted: Thu May 05, 2022 7:25 pm
by BiggsyMalone
PutneyO wrote: Thu May 05, 2022 7:22 pm Bigsy, our owner was a criminal/lunatic, thats why Orient nearly ceased to exist.
But you were happy for him to be outspending the divisions if it meant promotion

Re: Man City

Posted: Fri May 06, 2022 8:29 am
by Give it to Jabo
PutneyO wrote: Thu May 05, 2022 7:22 pm Bigsy, our owner was a criminal/lunatic, thats why Orient nearly ceased to exist.
Amen to that! (the first part of the sentence, that is!)

Re: Man City

Posted: Fri May 06, 2022 8:54 am
by Lifelongfan
Pep is a flat track bully. Glad they got knocked out. Grealish is a fraud too £100m and only a sub

Re: Man City

Posted: Fri May 06, 2022 9:27 am
by Chief crazy horse
A bit unfair on Grealish. True, he hasn't had the impact at City that many thought. That's because of the abundance of quality around him. Some players, and managers too, are suited to being a one club man. He was the 'king' at Villa and that's where he should have stayed.

Re: Man City

Posted: Fri May 06, 2022 10:09 am
by DrWindy
Chief crazy horse wrote: Fri May 06, 2022 9:27 am A bit unfair on Grealish. True, he hasn't had the impact at City that many thought. That's because of the abundance of quality around him. Some players, and managers too, are suited to being a one club man. He was the 'king' at Villa and that's where he should have stayed.
Not unlike Mahrez. He was sensational for Leicester. It’s taken him years to finally get himself some regular games.