Independent Leyton Orient Forum

Intentionally help Oldham tonight?

Of course not and you will see that by his post match reaction.

LittleMate wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 9:52 pm Of course not and you will see that by his post match reaction.

cockhat wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 9:53 pm

LittleMate wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 9:52 pm Of course not and you will see that by his post match reaction.

THE QUESTION TO BE ASKED IS
DID F*ck P@ul Have money on it ?

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 9:55 pm

cockhat wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 9:53 pm

LittleMate wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 9:52 pm Of course not and you will see that by his post match reaction.

THE QUESTION TO BE ASKED IS
DID F*ck P@ul Have money on it ?

Surely not!

cockhat wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 9:57 pm

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 9:55 pm

cockhat wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 9:53 pm

THE QUESTION TO BE ASKED IS
DID F*ck P@ul Have money on it ?

Surely not!

Youve seen the RW Interview, you saw the changes in the team picked , f*ck did the pre match press ,, Family History , it dont look good !!!!!!

1/3 injuries & suspensions
1/3 showing the January transfers aren't up to it
1/3 doing Oldham a favour

gshaw wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:43 pm 1/3 injuries & suspensions
1/3 showing the January transfers aren't up to it
1/3 doing Oldham a favour

100 % helped Oldham tonight

cockhat wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 9:51 pm Intentionally help Oldham tonight?

Yes.

(Does anyone remember Cardiff v Orient?)

I certainly do.

He stated in the LO down that he didn’t care if we finished 11th or 17th, he wanted to start preparing for next season and said the word experiment.

Whether it was a coincidence that he chose to start that experimentation against his former side, in desperate need of a win, is anyones guess.

So why send Vigs up in search of an equaliser

It certainly looks like it. He could have chosen the game against Scunny to "experiment".

Quite a serious allegation without any evidence.

Chicken Dhansak wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 8:36 am It certainly looks like it. He could have chosen the game against Scunny to "experiment".

If you’re going to “experiment” you don’t do it during a home game against a club everyone expects you to beat

Dextercoindexter wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 8:40 am Quite a serious allegation without any evidence.

Yes, it is some accusation...

I think the allegations should be removed.
To slur people with absolutely no evidence, is criminal

Story of O wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 8:32 am So why send Vigs up in search of an equaliser

Goal difference may well be relevant in who gets relegated

Dextercoindexter wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 8:40 am Quite a serious allegation without any evidence.

Lets hope Stevenage's Owners think
The same as you & just accept the experimenting .

Qin wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 10:24 am I think the allegations should be removed.
To slur people with absolutely no evidence, is criminal

Opinions & questions
Just the same as your slurs against players .

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 11:34 am

Qin wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 10:24 am I think the allegations should be removed.
To slur people with absolutely no evidence, is criminal

Opinions & questions
Just the same as your slurs against players .

Difference is, ive never accused players of being criminal, whereas youve accused Wellens or Terry, or both, of throwing a game.
If you cant see the difference, then you shouldnt be boarding

From the moment he accepted the job, it was RW's first mission was to stop the slide into
the NL and secure our League 2 status. He has, by and large, achieved that aim, but not quite.
That is why he should have played the full first team to ensure the progress continues, it was
irresponsible not to do this, IMO. Get over the required 52 points minimum then he can field
anyone he wants.

Qin wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 11:42 am

tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 11:34 am

Qin wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 10:24 am I think the allegations should be removed.
To slur people with absolutely no evidence, is criminal

Opinions & questions
Just the same as your slurs against players .

Difference is, ive never accused players of being criminal, whereas youve accused Wellens or Terry, or both, of throwing a game.
If you cant see the difference, then you shouldnt be boarding

No I havent
I asked a Question that a fellow boarder
Raised a concern .
The fact that our assistant coach
Reportedly has form with match gambling
One can draw a conclusion to possibilities
Of events & Circumstances .

You accusing a player of being incapable etc
Is disregarding the fact that your new found love
Of RW & F.P.T means you forget it is they who
put players in positions they dont play well .
Which really just compounds any suspicions that may get raised over Dodgy results.

We're not safe yet and last night could have left us only needing to add a full stop. However badly we played last night we would have walked away with point but for an own goal and a farce goal because we were desperate to equalise.

cymruO wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 1:39 pm We're not safe yet and last night could have left us only needing to add a full stop. However badly we played last night we would have walked away with point but for an own goal and a farce goal because we were desperate to equalise.

Which begs the question is the thread title correct ?

Priority make us mathematically safe 1st.
Experiment all you like then !