Independent Leyton Orient Forum

Posted: **Mon Jun 24, 2019 9:54 pm**

That’s the way to do it, no messing around, one scumbag under arrest.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... reets.html

Posted: **Mon Jun 24, 2019 10:12 pm**

The fella with the water pistol tho

Posted: **Mon Jun 24, 2019 10:38 pm**

Apparently it marks you and they can pick it up later, maybe under UV light?

Posted: **Mon Jun 24, 2019 10:43 pm**

I await Jo Brands take on the use of a water pistol.

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:16 am**

So much for wearing a high visibility vest

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:31 am**

I fully support the police action.

Interesting the action of spraying with dye, reminiscent of the cash boxes and clothes tabs that if not opened the "correct" way, expel dye.

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:51 am**

''Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott criticising the method, saying officers are 'not above the law.'
The Hackney MP tweeted: 'Knocking people off bikes is potentially very dangerous. It shouldn't be legal for anyone.
'Police are not above the law.' But officers from Camden Police, one of the London boroughs with the highest rates of moped-enabled crime– responded her tweet, saying: 'Someone who's responsible for law-making (or at least debating and ratifying new legislation) should probably realise that using tactical contact to terminate dangerous pursuits is entirely within our lawful power... And our responsibility.'

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 10:00 am**

Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:51 am ''Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott criticising the method, saying officers are 'not above the law.'
The Hackney MP tweeted: 'Knocking people off bikes is potentially very dangerous. It shouldn't be legal for anyone.
'Police are not above the law.' But officers from Camden Police, one of the London boroughs with the highest rates of moped-enabled crime– responded her tweet, saying: 'Someone who's responsible for law-making (or at least debating and ratifying new legislation) should probably realise that using tactical contact to terminate dangerous pursuits is entirely within our lawful power... And our responsibility.'

Abbott, expecting her to know the law? Or at least finding out before she speaks. No.

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 10:10 am**

dOh Nut wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 10:00 am
Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:51 am ''Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott criticising the method, saying officers are 'not above the law.'
The Hackney MP tweeted: 'Knocking people off bikes is potentially very dangerous. It shouldn't be legal for anyone.
'Police are not above the law.' But officers from Camden Police, one of the London boroughs with the highest rates of moped-enabled crime– responded her tweet, saying: 'Someone who's responsible for law-making (or at least debating and ratifying new legislation) should probably realise that using tactical contact to terminate dangerous pursuits is entirely within our lawful power... And our responsibility.'
Abbott, expecting her to know the law? Or at least finding out before she speaks. No.

Long ago I realised that this forum is not a suitable place to debate anything other than football matters and subjects of a non political and non controversial matters.

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 11:03 am**

dOh Nut wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 10:00 am
Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:51 am ''Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott criticising the method, saying officers are 'not above the law.'
The Hackney MP tweeted: 'Knocking people off bikes is potentially very dangerous. It shouldn't be legal for anyone.
'Police are not above the law.' But officers from Camden Police, one of the London boroughs with the highest rates of moped-enabled crime– responded her tweet, saying: 'Someone who's responsible for law-making (or at least debating and ratifying new legislation) should probably realise that using tactical contact to terminate dangerous pursuits is entirely within our lawful power... And our responsibility.'
Abbott, expecting her to know the law? Or at least finding out before she speaks. No.

Are you really this thick?

The response is irrelevant. She hasn't said that 'tactical contact' is illegal, just that it should be.

Tactical Contact is a great band name, by the way.

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 11:27 am**

Might change my username. Or yours.

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 11:48 am**

Well Done the Police, another scumbag off the streets hopefully..................Diane Abbott would probably give them a `suspended Fine` and a free Council House etc etc

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 12:02 pm**

Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 11:27 am Might change my username. Or yours.

Please do me! Please!

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 1:08 pm**

No but abbot said and I quote “they are not above the law” yet the police were acting fully WITHIN the law. Bizarre women.

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 1:13 pm**

She said it shouldn't be legal for anyone. Pretty clear what her point is.

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 1:17 pm**

CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 11:03 am
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 10:00 am
Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:51 am ''Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott criticising the method, saying officers are 'not above the law.'
The Hackney MP tweeted: 'Knocking people off bikes is potentially very dangerous. It shouldn't be legal for anyone.
'Police are not above the law.' But officers from Camden Police, one of the London boroughs with the highest rates of moped-enabled crime– responded her tweet, saying: 'Someone who's responsible for law-making (or at least debating and ratifying new legislation) should probably realise that using tactical contact to terminate dangerous pursuits is entirely within our lawful power... And our responsibility.'
Abbott, expecting her to know the law? Or at least finding out before she speaks. No.
Are you really this thick?

The response is irrelevant. She hasn't said that 'tactical contact' is illegal, just that it should be.

Tactical Contact is a great band name, by the way.

Depends how you read the statement. Interesting police reply says it all really. But I do agree. Abbott’s response is irrelevant. Par for the course.

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:06 pm**

I'll only be happy if they break his legs.

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:24 pm**

dOh Nut wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 1:17 pm
CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 11:03 am
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 10:00 am

Abbott, expecting her to know the law? Or at least finding out before she speaks. No.
Are you really this thick?

The response is irrelevant. She hasn't said that 'tactical contact' is illegal, just that it should be.

Tactical Contact is a great band name, by the way.
Depends how you read the statement. Interesting police reply says it all really. But I do agree. Abbott’s response is irrelevant. Par for the course.

Jesus Christ.

Her 'response' to this incident is entirely relevant. She think that police officers should not be undertaking Tactical Contact and has tweeted as much.

This is getting embarrassing now, even more so than normal.

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:57 pm**

This kind of incident is rife in Jakarta Indonesia police will either shoot on sight or if your caught in the neighbourhood stealing etc you get beaten up strip naked and then set on fire
Wonder what Diane Abbot would make of that

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 3:46 pm**

How else do you stop a moped in those circumstances without tactical combat?

Or is that the point?

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 4:03 pm**

It's TACTICAL CONTACT FFS!

Tactical Combat split up in 1981 after their first and only album flopped. They were still trying to do that post-punk thing but were too late.

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 4:08 pm**

Lucky7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:57 pm This kind of incident is rife in Jakarta Indonesia police will either shoot on sight or if your caught in the neighbourhood stealing etc you get beaten up strip naked and then set on fire
Wonder what Diane Abbot would make of that

Or the Chinese Communist Government's ''re-education camps'' !

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 4:09 pm**

CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 4:03 pm It's TACTICAL CONTACT FFS!

Tactical Combat split up in 1981 after their first and only album flopped. They were still trying to do that post-punk thing but were too late.

Well done Spunky. Down to auto spelling not being checked.

Any chance of an answer or should I check Google?

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 4:27 pm**

Don't ask me mate, I'm all for tactical contact.

Posted: **Tue Jun 25, 2019 8:16 pm**

CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:24 pm
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 1:17 pm
CreamofSumYungGai wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 11:03 am

Are you really this thick?

The response is irrelevant. She hasn't said that 'tactical contact' is illegal, just that it should be.

Tactical Contact is a great band name, by the way.
Depends how you read the statement. Interesting police reply says it all really. But I do agree. Abbott’s response is irrelevant. Par for the course.
Jesus Christ.

Her 'response' to this incident is entirely relevant. She think that police officers should not be undertaking Tactical Contact and has tweeted as much.

This is getting embarrassing now, even more so than normal.

I thought it was you who used the words irrelevant and relevant when commenting on her response.

Independent Leyton Orient Forum

Moped Police Take Down

Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down

Re: Moped Police Take Down