The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
As I've said before, I wish Macklin would publish the OFF emails as they will most likely show R***r conducting himself appallingly as usual.Long slender neck wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:50 pm High profile people have a responsibility to speak the truth, we've seen recently with Boris and his unfounded Saville nonsense in parliament where that led to Sir Kier being surrounded by a mob in the street. This aint much different.
Well remembered, is there much info about that incident?Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:33 pm Macklin was also getting abuse about the Orient Transit Firm guy getting banned - imagine that's the source of a lot of the abuse rather than the OFF issue.
Really sad, more so considering the good Macklin has done for our club.
Basically R***r went OFF at/harassed Danny Macklin by email, to the extent that Macklin needed to get the club's lawyers involved. Then bragged about it in his OFFicial statement which no doubt whipped his weak minded flock up to have a pop at Macklin too.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 11:04 pm Not sure what this is all about but Danny should talk a leaf out of Vigs book - publish the abuse. Name and shame those responsible, don’t run away and hide.
You would probably recognise his voice though from off of the radiopodblogcast.Smendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:53 pm OTF chickenshits hid the face of the guy that got banned behind an emoji in one of the tweets abusing Macklin. What a bunch of pussies.
How can you say that Saville comments were unfounded the guy was banged to rights, even though the BBC quick as a flash erased all episodes of Jim 'll Fix, it as soon as he died to try and cover up the fact they knew what he was doing. Your another one when says you can't speak the truth 'cause. Starmer couldn't find Hitler guiltyLong slender neck wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:50 pm High profile people have a responsibility to speak the truth, we've seen recently with Boris and his unfounded Saville nonsense in parliament where that led to Sir Kier being surrounded by a mob in the street. This aint much different.
Another weak minded, easily influenced otf type.Type high wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 1:15 amHow can you say that Saville comments were unfounded the guy was banged to rights, even though the BBC quick as a flash erased all episodes of Jim 'll Fix, it as soon as he died to try and cover up the fact they knew what he was doing. Your another one when says you can't speak the truth 'cause. Starmer couldn't find Hitler guiltyLong slender neck wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:50 pm High profile people have a responsibility to speak the truth, we've seen recently with Boris and his unfounded Saville nonsense in parliament where that led to Sir Kier being surrounded by a mob in the street. This aint much different.
Lost me on that one, otf is ?. Also, who are you digging out.Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:14 amAnother weak minded, easily influenced otf type.Type high wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 1:15 amHow can you say that Saville comments were unfounded the guy was banged to rights, even though the BBC quick as a flash erased all episodes of Jim 'll Fix, it as soon as he died to try and cover up the fact they knew what he was doing. Your another one when says you can't speak the truth 'cause. Starmer couldn't find Hitler guiltyLong slender neck wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:50 pm High profile people have a responsibility to speak the truth, we've seen recently with Boris and his unfounded Saville nonsense in parliament where that led to Sir Kier being surrounded by a mob in the street. This aint much different.
I know every club will have its share of absolute d*ckheads, but something about sending personal abuse to an employee who's made a point of being more accessible and transparent than any of his predecessors goes completely against what the club is. Hope these freaks can be identified and banned.Long slender neck wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:24 pm
Lofts message here while at the same time backing Off who has been briefing against the club and Danny doesn't feel right to me.
I guess I'm not really surprised that LOFFT would side with R***r rather than with what's right.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 9:51 am Lofts ‘regardless of the issue’ is still really troubling.
Eh? I posted that tweet, all it means is that no matter how deeply one feels about a particular situation, personal abuse is never acceptable.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 9:51 am Lofts ‘regardless of the issue’ is still really troubling.
I don't think it's "have a pop at LOFT" day, more that this is what happens when you post referential ambiguities on Twitter.A Pedant wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 10:49 amEh? I posted that tweet, all it means is that no matter how deeply one feels about a particular situation, personal abuse is never acceptable.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 9:51 am Lofts ‘regardless of the issue’ is still really troubling.
Clearly today is another 'have a pop at LOFT' day for whatever tiny word or detail someone can find, so I'll leave you to it.
Can't you see the irony. OFF was in trouble for dishing out personal abuse. Where is the difference? Both incidents have to be condemned out of hand.A Pedant wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 10:49 amEh? I posted that tweet, all it means is that no matter how deeply one feels about a particular situation, personal abuse is never acceptable.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 9:51 am Lofts ‘regardless of the issue’ is still really troubling.
Clearly today is another 'have a pop at LOFT' day for whatever tiny word or detail someone can find, so I'll leave you to it.