5 at the back- why?

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

Post Reply
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13101
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2277 times
Been thanked: 2934 times

5 at the back- why?

Post by Long slender neck »

Why the hell did Jackett start setting us up like this?

Early in the season we were winning games with 433
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

It’s supposed to be 3 at the back, not 5.
Cheshunto
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3101
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
Has thanked: 575 times
Been thanked: 760 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by Cheshunto »

Prestige Worldwide wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:09 pm Why the hell did Jackett start setting us up like this?

Early in the season we were winning games with 433
Early in the season we had Archibald out wide left firing in crosses and giving some service to the strikers.
Theo is sorely missed.
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13101
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2277 times
Been thanked: 2934 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by Long slender neck »

Cheshunto wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:15 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:09 pm Why the hell did Jackett start setting us up like this?

Early in the season we were winning games with 433
Early in the season we had Archibald out wide left firing in crosses and giving some service to the strikers.
Theo is sorely missed.
He was playing in the front three then
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13101
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2277 times
Been thanked: 2934 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by Long slender neck »

Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:11 pm It’s supposed to be 3 at the back, not 5.
Stop kidding yourself.

Moving Theo back there has been a disaster and Wood isnt capable. Its just like when they tried it with Brophy.
Orient Punxx
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1842
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 10:30 pm
Has thanked: 1603 times
Been thanked: 359 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by Orient Punxx »

No idea - Ogie should move to left back.
Cheshunto
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3101
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
Has thanked: 575 times
Been thanked: 760 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by Cheshunto »

Prestige Worldwide wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:17 pm
Cheshunto wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:15 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:09 pm Why the hell did Jackett start setting us up like this?

Early in the season we were winning games with 433
Early in the season we had Archibald out wide left firing in crosses and giving some service to the strikers.
Theo is sorely missed.
He was playing in the front three then
Yes, I know and I’d put him back there when he’s back fit.
Wood put in one decent cross tonight and Smith almost scored, but in general our strikers aren’t getting much service.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Wood is a decent footballing left back. But he’s not a wig back.
Cheshunto
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3101
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
Has thanked: 575 times
Been thanked: 760 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by Cheshunto »

Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:42 pm Wood is a decent footballing left back. But he’s not a wig back.
Yes agreed , we could see that on Saturday, but KJ put him there again tonight, it was like playing with Two Left backs, Wood and Ogie……..we badly need Theo back.
Stan1972
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1738
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:58 pm
Has thanked: 127 times
Been thanked: 466 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by Stan1972 »

With 2 games almost every week, Yep 4-3-3 is the formation which suits the squad of players we have and is what we should be playing.

Meaning
Wood & Moss playing as FB not WB.
2 from Mitchell, Beckles, Oggie, Thompson at CB
3 from Brown, Kyp, Pratt, Coleman, Young, Kemp
3 from Khan, Theo, Drinan, Smith, Smyth

Playing 2 games every week Drinan and Smith can alternate to keep fresh.

We need 2 more players:
FB to cover Wood & Moss
Winger to cover Khan & Theo.
User avatar
EliotNes
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10059
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:14 pm
Location: Retired (4182)
Has thanked: 1909 times
Been thanked: 831 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by EliotNes »

And why only two up front, when we are at home and trying to win matches.
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13101
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2277 times
Been thanked: 2934 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by Long slender neck »

This started when we brought Mitchell in didnt it?
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

EliotNes wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:19 am And why only two up front, when we are at home and trying to win matches.
I only saw the second half and the 5-1-2-2.

What formation did we play first half?
User avatar
EliotNes
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10059
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:14 pm
Location: Retired (4182)
Has thanked: 1909 times
Been thanked: 831 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by EliotNes »

Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:32 am
I only saw the second half and the 5-1-2-2.

What formation did we play first half?
It looked to me to be alternating between 5-1-2-2 and 5-3-2 all game.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by tuffers#1 »

EliotNes wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:47 am
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:32 am
I only saw the second half and the 5-1-2-2.

What formation did we play first half?
It looked to me to be alternating between 5-1-2-2 and 5-3-2 all game.
Dulcet Dave & his side-kick said we were playing a diamond 1st half .
It was rough as f*ck & uncut if we were !
User avatar
Thor
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10279
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
Location: Asgard
Has thanked: 584 times
Been thanked: 1346 times

Re: 5 at the back- why?

Post by Thor »

No the diamond quote was in the second half.
Post Reply