Page 1 of 2
election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:00 pm
by greyhound
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/police-invest ... 23591.html
could be something to this
seeing how popular Nigel is at the moment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e176a/e176ababbc1961e8e693cbef7171c93eccfde586" alt="huh :?"
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:27 pm
by EliotNes
Dirty politics probably again.
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:55 pm
by Thor
Already reported this in the labour thread which was ignored, funny that!!!
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:03 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:55 pm
Already reported this in the labour thread which was ignored, funny that!!!
Indeed. Police are investigating five cases of electoral fraud . Three with postal voting , one bribery and corruption and lastly voter behaviour. Apparently people were taking photos of their ballot papers . Probably wanting it as proof of voting so they could get paid .
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics ... rt-no-deal
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... byelection
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:05 pm
by greyhound
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:55 pm
Already reported this in the labour thread which was ignored, funny that!!!
sorry mate never noticed it.
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:24 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
greyhound wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:05 pm
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:55 pm
Already reported this in the labour thread which was ignored, funny that!!!
sorry mate never noticed it.
Next time he will take a photograph as proof.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9de7/e9de763900276c90eada8c44081deee398cd8864" alt="Twisted Evil :twisted:"
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:32 pm
by Thor
No I was referring to the old socialists on this board who quite conveniently ignored it, not moaning at the op of this thread!
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:20 pm
by Real Al
Plenty of people photographed their ballot slips during the EU elections to post on social media. Could be that too.
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:23 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Real Al wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:20 pm
Plenty of people photographed their ballot slips during the EU elections to post on social media. Could be that too.
Could be they just wanted to practice macro photography.
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:30 pm
by Long slender neck
10000 postal votes from a total of about 34000 ballots. Red flag!
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:40 pm
by Proposition Joe
Racist tropes from sore losers.
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:46 pm
by Real Al
Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:30 pm
10000 postal votes from a total of about 34000 ballots. Red flag!
Hardly proof though. There was about the same number in 2017 (albeit with a higher turnout) and Labour pitched at the postal voter.
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:49 pm
by Long slender neck
Seems high, but I admit I don't know what the usual figures are.
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:56 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:30 pm
10000 postal votes from a total of about 34000 ballots. Red flag!
Maybe the outgoing MP filled out the forms in other peoples names.
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:59 pm
by StillSpike
You lost - get over it
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:00 pm
by StillSpike
But the good news is your side can have another shot in a couple of years (at the most)
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:07 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
StillSpike wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:00 pm
But the good news is your side can have another shot in a couple of years (at the most)
Depends whose in charge of the postal votes. Some get counted whilst others disappear up in smoke.
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:43 pm
by Proposition Joe
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:07 pm
StillSpike wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:00 pm
But the good news is your side can have another shot in a couple of years (at the most)
Depends whose in charge of the postal votes. Some get counted whilst others disappear up in smoke.
That a fact, is it?
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:01 am
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:43 pm
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:07 pm
StillSpike wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:00 pm
But the good news is your side can have another shot in a couple of years (at the most)
Depends whose in charge of the postal votes. Some get counted whilst others disappear up in smoke.
That a fact, is it?
It’s all speculation of course. The investigation will show nothing, any dodgy dealers will be too good at covering their tracks.
Could it be true? Of course. But innocent until proven guilty is how it works.
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:32 am
by Long slender neck
6000 postal votes for Labour apparently
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:37 am
by jamespevans
Cambridge Analytica bloke moans about election malpractice - you can actually make it up!
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:37 am
by Sid Bishop
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 1:11 pm
by Proposition Joe
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:01 am
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:43 pm
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:07 pm
Depends whose in charge of the postal votes. Some get counted whilst others disappear up in smoke.
That a fact, is it?
It’s all speculation of course. The investigation will show nothing, any dodgy dealers will be too good at covering their tracks.
Could it be true? Of course. But innocent until proven guilty is how it works.
Quite. But that's the opposite of your post, which clearly implied predetermined guilt.
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 1:39 pm
by StillSpike
anyone wrote: ↑Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:01 am
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:43 pm
anyone wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:07 pm
dOh Nut dresses up as a West Ham fan
That a fact, is it?
It’s all speculation of course. The investigation will show nothing, he always closes the curtains so there's no video evidence.
Could it be true? Of course. But innocent until proven guilty is how it works.
See how that works? There's no smoke without fire
Re: election malpractice
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 4:29 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue Jun 18, 2019 1:11 pm
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:01 am
It’s all speculation of course. The investigation will show nothing, any dodgy dealers will be too good at covering their tracks.
Could it be true? Of course. But innocent until proven guilty is how it works.
Quite. But that's the opposite of your post, which clearly implied predetermined guilt.
You clearly have never gotten my provocative Style (or lack of) posting. Which often is intended to promote dialogue. Devils advocate stuff.