Page 1 of 2

Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 7:49 am
by Snowyash
Rumour that we are interested in him, for the third time. Apparently played under Justin at Gills.

https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/ ... r-earners/

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 7:58 am
by Thor
A neat and tidy player, if he were to sign I guess that puts pressure on Gorman for a starting berth.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 8:14 am
by Real Al
Hmm, one of the top earners at a club with a large budget...

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 8:23 am
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Real Al wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 8:14 am Hmm, one of the top earners at a club with a large budget...
Could be a demotivator, dropping down and less money. But a London boy perhaps he personally would be happier in London than Bradford.

An OK player whose career has mostly been above L2.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 8:28 am
by CreamofSumYungGai
Absolutely not the sort of player we need.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 8:30 am
by ContrifibulatoryFred
He’s a bit too fluffy in my opinion

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 8:31 am
by Long slender neck
No thanks

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 8:37 am
by Fellowo
Would be very underwhelmed if he signed.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 8:51 am
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
So a guy who has played 300 games at L1/championship level consistently over a number of years ain’t good enough for a L2 side!

Paging Mr Messi.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 9:17 am
by Scuba Diver
Never as bad as the experts on here made out. (see also, John Marquis). Probably needs to play alongside a midfield-enforcer though to be effective, which we don't really have.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 9:18 am
by Give it to Jabo
Neat and tidy: does remind of Gorman’s style, however.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 9:19 am
by Thor
If he is one of the cm's coming in then hopefully the other is the enforcer we desperately need.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 9:20 am
by Thor
Give it to Jabo wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 9:18 am Neat and tidy: does remind of Gorman’s style, however.
Agreed, the main difference is his ball retention was better when he was here last.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 9:21 am
by Baddo
Was average in our league one side at that time.
Which to be fair might make him better than average in our L2 side next year especially after more experience at the level above since then.

But not really the Dawson/Vincelot mould I think we desperately need

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 9:28 am
by Still's Carenae
I would not be unhappy if we signed him. He is nearly 30 and we again become top heavy with older players. Currently 5 signed and with Dayton and Turley probables brings this to 7. What we are still missing is the 24-28 age group with only Brophy and Clay within this group.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 9:30 am
by Thor
Baddo wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 9:21 am Was average in our league one side at that time.
Which to be fair might make him better than average in our L2 side next year especially after more experience at the level above since then.

But not really the Dawson/Vincelot mould I think we desperately need
Agreed, but we need 2 players in that position so if the other is the enforcer we will be well covered on the middle of the park.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 9:59 am
by Sid Bishop
Thor wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 9:30 am
Baddo wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 9:21 am Was average in our league one side at that time.
Which to be fair might make him better than average in our L2 side next year especially after more experience at the level above since then.

But not really the Dawson/Vincelot mould I think we desperately need
Agreed, but we need 2 players in that position so if the other is the enforcer we will be well covered on the middle of the park.
So if two players needed in each position, then two midfield enforcers still needed as none in the squad at present. If that did happen and Wright also joined, then 3 players for the other midfield position, e.g Wright, Clay and last in the pecking order.......Gorman !!
Of course with injuries, suspensions and loss of form, never as clear cut as that.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:07 am
by Lucky7
Still's Carenae wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 9:28 am I would not be unhappy if we signed him. He is nearly 30 and we again become top heavy with older players. Currently 5 signed and with Dayton and Turley probables brings this to 7. What we are still missing is the 24-28 age group with only Brophy and Clay within this group.
Ageist post I might have to report you 😂😂😋

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:15 am
by Sid Bishop
Lucky7 wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 10:07 am
Still's Carenae wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 9:28 am I would not be unhappy if we signed him. He is nearly 30 and we again become top heavy with older players. Currently 5 signed and with Dayton and Turley probables brings this to 7. What we are still missing is the 24-28 age group with only Brophy and Clay within this group.
Ageist post I might have to report you 😂😂😋
Also what about the under 24 age group !!

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:21 am
by Lucky7
Sid Bishop wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 10:15 am
Lucky7 wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 10:07 am
Still's Carenae wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 9:28 am I would not be unhappy if we signed him. He is nearly 30 and we again become top heavy with older players. Currently 5 signed and with Dayton and Turley probables brings this to 7. What we are still missing is the 24-28 age group with only Brophy and Clay within this group.
Ageist post I might have to report you 😂😂😋
Also what about the under 24 age group !!
See I was right ageist lol

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 11:56 am
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
Thor wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 9:20 am
Give it to Jabo wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 9:18 am Neat and tidy: does remind of Gorman’s style, however.
Agreed, the main difference is his ball retention was better when he was here last.
His similarity to Gorman is my only concern. But given Gorman has not proved himself perhaps him coming in ahead of Gorman makes sense. Don't recall if he was a tough enforcer type of player, which is what we need. Some bite in CM. Something we are lacking.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 12:44 pm
by Top of the JES
Scuba Diver wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 9:17 am Never as bad as the experts on here made out. (see also, John Marquis). Probably needs to play alongside a midfield-enforcer though to be effective, which we don't really have.
This.

He's decent, has played a lot of his career at a higher level than L2. Would be a good addition.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 12:47 pm
by Proposition Joe
No thanks. May as well get Jimmy Smith back.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 1:10 pm
by CreamofSumYungGai
dOh Nut wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 11:56 am
Thor wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 9:20 am
Give it to Jabo wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 9:18 am Neat and tidy: does remind of Gorman’s style, however.
Agreed, the main difference is his ball retention was better when he was here last.
His similarity to Gorman is my only concern. But given Gorman has not proved himself perhaps him coming in ahead of Gorman makes sense. Don't recall if he was a tough enforcer type of player, which is what we need. Some bite in CM. Something we are lacking.
He’s nothing like Gorman.

Re: Josh Wright

Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 1:30 pm
by F*ck The Poor & Fat
CreamofSumYungGai wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 1:10 pm
dOh Nut wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 11:56 am
Thor wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 9:20 am

Agreed, the main difference is his ball retention was better when he was here last.
His similarity to Gorman is my only concern. But given Gorman has not proved himself perhaps him coming in ahead of Gorman makes sense. Don't recall if he was a tough enforcer type of player, which is what we need. Some bite in CM. Something we are lacking.
He’s nothing like Gorman.
There will be differences of course. What do you consider to be the main ones.