Shamima Begum
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 9:58 am
Not allowed back to the Uk to fight her appeal
http://news.sky.com/story/shamima-begum ... s-12229270
http://news.sky.com/story/shamima-begum ... s-12229270
The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
Forgive my ignorance, but has she committed any crimes in Syria? I was thinking more about terrorism offences (if any) committed here.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:38 am Should she not be charged in the country she committed the crimes though?
So she's broken UK law. Why shouldn't she face justice here then?
The harm is symbolic.
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:08 am Awful to see a young girl - one of our own from Bethnal Green, to boot - being treated like this.
So if a British person commits a crime abroad, they should be tried here? Why?ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:15 am I too am uncomfortable with this verdict. As has been said, shes British, and is therefore our problem, and should be tried here for any alleged offences
All of her children are dead.LittleMate wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:26 amThe harm is symbolic.
It may serve to radicalise certain elements of the far right wing and cause tensions in the moderate muslim community that do not want her either.
Our legal system is not set up for this modern problem. There should be an offense in statute that sees people who go off and follow radical fundamentalist ideals immediately incarcerated upon their return. Allow her back in and the people supporting her claims in the UK will want her out on bail.
A serious question. What is the status of her children? She left as single and I'm guessing she wants to bring a family unit back??
What does the first paragraph mean in this context? In her case, she's not been found guilty of anything because she's not been allowed a fair trial yet.EastDerehamO wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:30 am Difficult to have any sympathy for her, and I’ve long been of the opinion that the legal system too often seems to lean over backwards to try to protect the rights of the Guilty at the expense – both at physical risk and at cost – to the vast majority of law-abiding citizens.
But I get what people are saying, and it has to be a fair system.
She has not got any children. She gave birth to 3 children but they all died.LittleMate wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:26 amThe harm is symbolic.
It may serve to radicalise certain elements of the far right wing and cause tensions in the moderate muslim community that do not want her either.
Our legal system is not set up for this modern problem. There should be an offense in statute that sees people who go off and follow radical fundamentalist ideals immediately incarcerated upon their return. Allow her back in and the people supporting her claims in the UK will want her out on bail.
A serious question. What is the status of her children? She left as single and I'm guessing she wants to bring a family unit back??
Can she not be charged with treason which is a current offence? Mind you with a sentence of up to life it wouldn’t be cheap to bring her home.LittleMate wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:26 am
The harm is symbolic.
It may serve to radicalise certain elements of the far right wing and cause tensions in the moderate muslim community that do not want her either.
Our legal system is not set up for this modern problem. There should be an offense in statute that sees people who go off and follow radical fundamentalist ideals immediately incarcerated upon their return. Allow her back in and the people supporting her claims in the UK will want her out on bail.
A serious question. What is the status of her children? She left as single and I'm guessing she wants to bring a family unit back??
Of course they should be tried in that country. However, as far as we're aware, there's no evidence that she has committed any crimes in Syria - she's at present living in a refugee camp.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:35 amSo if a British person commits a crime abroad, they should be tried here? Why?ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:15 am I too am uncomfortable with this verdict. As has been said, shes British, and is therefore our problem, and should be tried here for any alleged offences
^ This.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:39 amWhat does the first paragraph mean in this context? In her case, she's not been found guilty of anything because she's not been allowed a fair trial yet.EastDerehamO wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:30 am Difficult to have any sympathy for her, and I’ve long been of the opinion that the legal system too often seems to lean over backwards to try to protect the rights of the Guilty at the expense – both at physical risk and at cost – to the vast majority of law-abiding citizens.
But I get what people are saying, and it has to be a fair system.
Don't have a jot of sympathy with her, but she has rights as a citizen of this country as anyone else does. And it is against international law to leave people stateless, which she would be if we go ahead with this decision.
Here, once her sentence finishes.Admin wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:41 amOf course they should be tried in that country. However, as far as we're aware, there's no evidence that she has committed any crimes in Syria - she's at present living in a refugee camp.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:35 amSo if a British person commits a crime abroad, they should be tried here? Why?ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:15 am I too am uncomfortable with this verdict. As has been said, shes British, and is therefore our problem, and should be tried here for any alleged offences
We imprison foreign nationals here in the UK for crimes committed in the UK. And then in many cases we deport those foreign nationals back to their country of origin.
So hypothetically, if SB is tried and convicted in Syria, serves her sentence, where should Syria deport her to?
This. I’ve just been reading that she has/had dual citizenship with Bangladesh so the UK revoking her citizenship has not made her stateless.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:48 amHere, once her sentence finishes.Admin wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:41 amOf course they should be tried in that country. However, as far as we're aware, there's no evidence that she has committed any crimes in Syria - she's at present living in a refugee camp.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:35 am
So if a British person commits a crime abroad, they should be tried here? Why?
We imprison foreign nationals here in the UK for crimes committed in the UK. And then in many cases we deport those foreign nationals back to their country of origin.
So hypothetically, if SB is tried and convicted in Syria, serves her sentence, where should Syria deport her to?
Or Bangladesh. Whats the reason she doesnt have citizenship there again? Because they dont want anything to do with her either.