Page 1 of 13

Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 9:58 am
by Currywurst and Chips
Not allowed back to the Uk to fight her appeal

http://news.sky.com/story/shamima-begum ... s-12229270

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:08 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Awful to see a young girl - one of our own from Bethnal Green, to boot - being treated like this.

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:18 am
by EliotNes
A correct judgement IMO.

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:20 am
by Millennial Snowflake
7 pages of balanced reasoned debate

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:22 am
by Admin
Hmmm. Putting aside everyone's wide ranging views on Ms Begum's alleged crimes, I'm not comfortable with this country stripping citizenship as a way of wiping it's hands of a problem.

Shamima Begum was born in Britain - as far as I'm aware, it's a common misconception that she holds Bangladeshi citizenship. She may or may not be entitled to it, but Bangladesh will not allow her entry and has therefore been made stateless. She's a British problem and should be allowed to return and face charges for the crimes she's allegedly committed.

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:38 am
by Long slender neck
Should she not be charged in the country she committed the crimes though?

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:54 am
by Admin
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:38 am Should she not be charged in the country she committed the crimes though?
Forgive my ignorance, but has she committed any crimes in Syria? I was thinking more about terrorism offences (if any) committed here.

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:59 am
by Long slender neck
No idea. They dont seem to be interested in her. Is being in ISIS or whatever not a crime in Syria?

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:09 am
by Cheshunto
EliotNes wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:18 am A correct judgement IMO.
Absolutely correct.
She went off to join a Terrorist organisation who executed westerners, I don’t want her anywhere near these shores.

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:15 am
by ComeOnYouOs
I too am uncomfortable with this verdict. As has been said, shes British, and is therefore our problem, and should be tried here for any alleged offences

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:16 am
by Admin
Cheshunto wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:09 am
EliotNes wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:18 am A correct judgement IMO.
Absolutely correct.
She went off to join a Terrorist organisation who executed westerners, I don’t want her anywhere near these shores.
So she's broken UK law. Why shouldn't she face justice here then?

Don't get me wrong, I understand the emotions behind your view, but what harm do you think she'd be able to do if she returned?

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:26 am
by LittleMate
Admin wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:16 am
Cheshunto wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:09 am
EliotNes wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:18 am A correct judgement IMO.
Absolutely correct.
She went off to join a Terrorist organisation who executed westerners, I don’t want her anywhere near these shores.
So she's broken UK law. Why shouldn't she face justice here then?

Don't get me wrong, I understand the emotions behind your view, but what harm do you think she'd be able to do if she returned?
The harm is symbolic.

It may serve to radicalise certain elements of the far right wing and cause tensions in the moderate muslim community that do not want her either.

Our legal system is not set up for this modern problem. There should be an offense in statute that sees people who go off and follow radical fundamentalist ideals immediately incarcerated upon their return. Allow her back in and the people supporting her claims in the UK will want her out on bail.

A serious question. What is the status of her children? She left as single and I'm guessing she wants to bring a family unit back??

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:29 am
by Currywurst and Chips
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:08 am Awful to see a young girl - one of our own from Bethnal Green, to boot - being treated like this.
:D

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:30 am
by EastDerehamO
Difficult to have any sympathy for her, and I’ve long been of the opinion that the legal system too often seems to lean over backwards to try to protect the rights of the Guilty at the expense – both at physical risk and at cost – to the vast majority of law-abiding citizens.

But I get what people are saying, and it has to be a fair system.

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:35 am
by Long slender neck
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:15 am I too am uncomfortable with this verdict. As has been said, shes British, and is therefore our problem, and should be tried here for any alleged offences
So if a British person commits a crime abroad, they should be tried here? Why?

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:36 am
by Admin
LittleMate wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:26 am
Admin wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:16 am
Cheshunto wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:09 am

Absolutely correct.
She went off to join a Terrorist organisation who executed westerners, I don’t want her anywhere near these shores.
So she's broken UK law. Why shouldn't she face justice here then?

Don't get me wrong, I understand the emotions behind your view, but what harm do you think she'd be able to do if she returned?
The harm is symbolic.

It may serve to radicalise certain elements of the far right wing and cause tensions in the moderate muslim community that do not want her either.

Our legal system is not set up for this modern problem. There should be an offense in statute that sees people who go off and follow radical fundamentalist ideals immediately incarcerated upon their return. Allow her back in and the people supporting her claims in the UK will want her out on bail.

A serious question. What is the status of her children? She left as single and I'm guessing she wants to bring a family unit back??
All of her children are dead.

Hypothetically, if she returned, what do you think the UK Government would do with her?

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:39 am
by Mistadobalina
EastDerehamO wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:30 am Difficult to have any sympathy for her, and I’ve long been of the opinion that the legal system too often seems to lean over backwards to try to protect the rights of the Guilty at the expense – both at physical risk and at cost – to the vast majority of law-abiding citizens.

But I get what people are saying, and it has to be a fair system.
What does the first paragraph mean in this context? In her case, she's not been found guilty of anything because she's not been allowed a fair trial yet.

Don't have a jot of sympathy with her, but she has rights as a citizen of this country as anyone else does. And it is against international law to leave people stateless, which she would be if we go ahead with this decision.

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:40 am
by StillSpike
I think people in this country have had quite enough of following international law.

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:40 am
by Sid Bishop
LittleMate wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:26 am
Admin wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:16 am
Cheshunto wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:09 am

Absolutely correct.
She went off to join a Terrorist organisation who executed westerners, I don’t want her anywhere near these shores.
So she's broken UK law. Why shouldn't she face justice here then?

Don't get me wrong, I understand the emotions behind your view, but what harm do you think she'd be able to do if she returned?
The harm is symbolic.

It may serve to radicalise certain elements of the far right wing and cause tensions in the moderate muslim community that do not want her either.

Our legal system is not set up for this modern problem. There should be an offense in statute that sees people who go off and follow radical fundamentalist ideals immediately incarcerated upon their return. Allow her back in and the people supporting her claims in the UK will want her out on bail.

A serious question. What is the status of her children? She left as single and I'm guessing she wants to bring a family unit back??
She has not got any children. She gave birth to 3 children but they all died.

Re: Shamima Begu

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:41 am
by Ornchurch
LittleMate wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:26 am
The harm is symbolic.

It may serve to radicalise certain elements of the far right wing and cause tensions in the moderate muslim community that do not want her either.

Our legal system is not set up for this modern problem. There should be an offense in statute that sees people who go off and follow radical fundamentalist ideals immediately incarcerated upon their return. Allow her back in and the people supporting her claims in the UK will want her out on bail.

A serious question. What is the status of her children? She left as single and I'm guessing she wants to bring a family unit back??
Can she not be charged with treason which is a current offence? Mind you with a sentence of up to life it wouldn’t be cheap to bring her home.

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:41 am
by Admin
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:35 am
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:15 am I too am uncomfortable with this verdict. As has been said, shes British, and is therefore our problem, and should be tried here for any alleged offences
So if a British person commits a crime abroad, they should be tried here? Why?
Of course they should be tried in that country. However, as far as we're aware, there's no evidence that she has committed any crimes in Syria - she's at present living in a refugee camp.

We imprison foreign nationals here in the UK for crimes committed in the UK. And then in many cases we deport those foreign nationals back to their country of origin.

So hypothetically, if SB is tried and convicted in Syria, serves her sentence, where should Syria deport her to?

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:42 am
by Admin
Mistadobalina wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:39 am
EastDerehamO wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:30 am Difficult to have any sympathy for her, and I’ve long been of the opinion that the legal system too often seems to lean over backwards to try to protect the rights of the Guilty at the expense – both at physical risk and at cost – to the vast majority of law-abiding citizens.

But I get what people are saying, and it has to be a fair system.
What does the first paragraph mean in this context? In her case, she's not been found guilty of anything because she's not been allowed a fair trial yet.

Don't have a jot of sympathy with her, but she has rights as a citizen of this country as anyone else does. And it is against international law to leave people stateless, which she would be if we go ahead with this decision.
^ This.

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:46 am
by Mistadobalina
Why do we keep talking about financial costs? You're into failed state territory once you start starting saying that following due process is too expensive to be worth doing. Having a legal system with integrity and independence is a major economic plus point for this country.

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:48 am
by Long slender neck
Admin wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:41 am
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:35 am
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:15 am I too am uncomfortable with this verdict. As has been said, shes British, and is therefore our problem, and should be tried here for any alleged offences
So if a British person commits a crime abroad, they should be tried here? Why?
Of course they should be tried in that country. However, as far as we're aware, there's no evidence that she has committed any crimes in Syria - she's at present living in a refugee camp.

We imprison foreign nationals here in the UK for crimes committed in the UK. And then in many cases we deport those foreign nationals back to their country of origin.

So hypothetically, if SB is tried and convicted in Syria, serves her sentence, where should Syria deport her to?
Here, once her sentence finishes.

Or Bangladesh. Whats the reason she doesnt have citizenship there again? Because they dont want anything to do with her either.

Re: Shamima Begum

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:51 am
by Ornchurch
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:48 am
Admin wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:41 am
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 11:35 am

So if a British person commits a crime abroad, they should be tried here? Why?
Of course they should be tried in that country. However, as far as we're aware, there's no evidence that she has committed any crimes in Syria - she's at present living in a refugee camp.

We imprison foreign nationals here in the UK for crimes committed in the UK. And then in many cases we deport those foreign nationals back to their country of origin.

So hypothetically, if SB is tried and convicted in Syria, serves her sentence, where should Syria deport her to?
Here, once her sentence finishes.

Or Bangladesh. Whats the reason she doesnt have citizenship there again? Because they dont want anything to do with her either.
This. I’ve just been reading that she has/had dual citizenship with Bangladesh so the UK revoking her citizenship has not made her stateless.