Page 1 of 1

Trains Debate

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 4:55 pm
by ContrifibulatoryFred
Should Huskisson have been more careful?

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 5:24 pm
by tuffers#1
Sheldon would probably disagree .

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 5:28 pm
by Omygawd
He was pretty careless tbf. Mind you, something that comes at you at Rocket speed takes a bit of avoidance.

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 6:40 pm
by WickfordO
Lack of H & S.

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 6:41 pm
by WickfordO
It was all a smoke screen.

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 7:01 pm
by Stowaway
The first recorded incident of death by lettuce, I believe.

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:28 pm
by slacker
:D I’m only half getting this thread, and no idea why CF has mentioned it now.

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:58 pm
by Constanza
I heard he was Chuffed to bits

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 7:25 am
by ContrifibulatoryFred
As we already have a ‘the trans debate’ I felt it necessary to offer an alternative thread for discussion of locomotive machines.
Admin was going to be the Fat Controller - but he has shed so much weight recently I had to swerve appointing him to monitor this discussion.

Huskisson died for political reasons by the way.
He tried to do a ‘Heseltine’ by resigning from the Duke of Wellington’s administration. However upon discovering that no one cared about him going, he then announced that his decision was a mistake.
The Duke of Wellington then responded and coined the memorable phrase (make no mistake) in the process: ‘There has been no mistake, there is no mistake, and there can be no mistake.’
Months passed with Hiskisson sidelined until he heard that Wellington was going up north to see the inaugural journey of Spehenson’s Rocket (1829). During the event Huskisson spotted the Prime Minister and rushed over in the hope of speaking to him to try to repair their rift. In his haste to reach Wellington, Huskisson crosses another rail track where he was struck and killed by another locomotive.
Hence, political shenanigans lay at the heart of this tragic event.
Have a nice day

CF

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 8:48 am
by Constanza
When I was about 9 me and my mate Arnie decided we needed a hobby. So on Saturdays we went up to Worcester Foregate Street (sometimes Shrub Hill if we were feeling reckless) and went train spotting.
Writing down the numbers in our colour coded notebooks was fun for a while. Then one rainy morning we were surrounded by a bunch of Redditch lads who called us train sissys (early seventies equivalent of bus w*nker) who mocked us and punched us and threw my beloved books and red and green pens onto the tracks.
Never went again but decided to take up more manly hobbies. Still love baking to this day.

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 9:05 am
by ContrifibulatoryFred
Sad that random acts of cruelty can stunt nerdyism in such a permanent way

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 3:10 pm
by WickfordO
Constanza wrote: Tue Oct 13, 2020 8:48 am When I was about 9 me and my mate Arnie decided we needed a hobby. So on Saturdays we went up to Worcester Foregate Street (sometimes Shrub Hill if we were feeling reckless) and went train spotting.
Writing down the numbers in our colour coded notebooks was fun for a while. Then one rainy morning we were surrounded by a bunch of Redditch lads who called us train sissys (early seventies equivalent of bus w*nker) who mocked us and punched us and threw my beloved books and red and green pens onto the tracks.
Never went again but decided to take up more manly hobbies. Still love baking to this day.
Fortunately I didn't experience that kind if laddish bullying when I went spotting and to this day my love of trains still exists though not in an anorakish, rivet counting way. So I do feel that you lost out there Constanza. I do hope you have some smouldering liking of trains.

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 5:51 pm
by WickfordO
ContrifibulatoryFred wrote: Tue Oct 13, 2020 7:25 am As we already have a ‘the trans debate’ I felt it necessary to offer an alternative thread for discussion of locomotive machines.
Admin was going to be the Fat Controller - but he has shed so much weight recently I had to swerve appointing him to monitor this discussion.

Huskisson died for political reasons by the way.
He tried to do a ‘Heseltine’ by resigning from the Duke of Wellington’s administration. However upon discovering that no one cared about him going, he then announced that his decision was a mistake.
The Duke of Wellington then responded and coined the memorable phrase (make no mistake) in the process: ‘There has been no mistake, there is no mistake, and there can be no mistake.’
Months passed with Hiskisson sidelined until he heard that Wellington was going up north to see the inaugural journey of Spehenson’s Rocket (1829). During the event Huskisson spotted the Prime Minister and rushed over in the hope of speaking to him to try to repair their rift. In his haste to reach Wellington, Huskisson crosses another rail track where he was struck and killed by another locomotive.
Hence, political shenanigans lay at the heart of this tragic event.
Have a nice day

CF
Shouldn't that be because of political reasons, not for political reasons, or is that just about use of the English language.

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2020 11:32 am
by ContrifibulatoryFred
Whatever

Re: Trains Debate

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2020 3:26 pm
by slacker
Choo-choo thought for the day: When it comes to 2-bob DMUs, I’d take a Pacer over a Sprinter any day.