Page 1 of 1
Ratings
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:26 pm
by jamespevans
I think we'd all accept the point from that game against a Barrow side that look a decent under Dunn, looking to pass the ball and use their width.
Vigouroux - 8 - some excellent saves after one dodgy moment early on
Brophy - 6.5 - had a difficult game with them doubling up on his side. Few too many crosses coming in for my liking
Happe - n/a - possibly can blame the wind but was a stone wall red
Coulson - 7 - did well to hold the line with Widdowson
Ling - 6 - once he was booked early on he was on a hiding to nothing. too many crosses and possibly to blame for the goal
Cisse - 6.5 - solid cover for the back four but uncharacteristically gave the ball away quite a bit up-field
Dayton - n/a - was his usual anonymous self for the last 80 minutes
Clay - 8 - MOM. all over the pitch, protecting Brophy and the centre backs but was also willing to support our attack. Excellent assist for the goal
Dennis - 5 - once Happe went off and they put him in the centre he contributed very little and probably should have come off at half time
Wilkinson - 6.5 - if only he had half a yard extra pace we would have won the game late on. worked hard but had very little space
Johnson - 7 - you knew once he got the ball the equaliser was a formality. Worked really hard up front
Widdowson - 7 - the right decision to bring him on early and did his job
McAnuff - 7 - should have come on earlier, the midfield looked a lot more solid after he came on
Akinola - 7 - lot less crosses came in after he came on, do I need to say anymore?
Re: Ratings
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:28 pm
by MrB
Dennis-Pony
Re: Ratings
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:38 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Just do your own thread, then. tw*t.
Re: Ratings
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:39 pm
by MrB
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:38 pm
Just do your own thread, then. tw*t.
Cool
Re: Ratings
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:41 pm
by Beradogs
Last week there were no ratings threads so I stepped up unselfishly and now there are three. I think we should nominate someone who is head of ratings.
Re: Ratings
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 6:01 pm
by jamespevans
Beradogs wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:41 pm
Last week there were no ratings threads so I stepped up unselfishly and now there are three. I think we should nominate someone who is head of ratings.
Sorry Bera, I checked to see if there was a ratings thread and missed yours. Would delete mine but you've all added comments.
Re: Ratings
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 7:10 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Beradogs wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:41 pm
Last week there were no ratings threads so I stepped up unselfishly and now there are three. I think we should nominate someone who is head of ratings.
Me. Mine even has ‘Official’ in the title, ffs.
Re: Ratings
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 7:10 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
jamespevans wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 6:01 pm
Beradogs wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:41 pm
Last week there were no ratings threads so I stepped up unselfishly and now there are three. I think we should nominate someone who is head of ratings.
Sorry Bera, I checked to see if there was a ratings thread and missed yours. Would delete mine but you've all added comments.
And missed mine too?
Re: Ratings
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 8:26 pm
by Loyal_Supporter
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 7:10 pm
Beradogs wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:41 pm
Last week there were no ratings threads so I stepped up unselfishly and now there are three. I think we should nominate someone who is head of ratings.
Me. Mine even has ‘Official’ in the title, ffs.
Your ratings were ridiculous. Ling a 2? Not official in the slightest.
Re: Ratings
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 8:57 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Loyal_Supporter wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 8:26 pm
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 7:10 pm
Beradogs wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:41 pm
Last week there were no ratings threads so I stepped up unselfishly and now there are three. I think we should nominate someone who is head of ratings.
Me. Mine even has ‘Official’ in the title, ffs.
Your ratings were ridiculous. Ling a 2? Not official in the slightest.
If I’d have gone lower, people might have thought I wasn’t being serious.
Re: Ratings
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:21 pm
by y o y o y
jamespevans wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 6:01 pm
Beradogs wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:41 pm
Last week there were no ratings threads so I stepped up unselfishly and now there are three. I think we should nominate someone who is head of ratings.
Sorry Bera, I checked to see if there was a ratings thread and missed yours. Would delete mine but you've all added comments.
Until Chingford Red returns with his ratings thread you'll have to fight it out amongst yourselves on game by game basis
Re: Ratings
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 10:12 pm
by gshaw
Beradogs wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:41 pm
Last week there were no ratings threads so I stepped up unselfishly and now there are three. I think we should nominate someone who is head of ratings.
It's not official unless you title it "Ratings thread"

Re: Ratings
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 12:42 pm
by DuvB
jamespevans wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:26 pm
I think we'd all accept the point from that game against a Barrow side that look a decent under Dunn, looking to pass the ball and use their width.
Vigouroux - 8 - some excellent saves after one dodgy moment early on
Brophy - 6.5 - had a difficult game with them doubling up on his side. Few too many crosses coming in for my liking
Happe - n/a - possibly can blame the wind but was a stone wall red
Coulson - 7 - did well to hold the line with Widdowson
Ling - 6 - once he was booked early on he was on a hiding to nothing. too many crosses and possibly to blame for the goal
Cisse - 6.5 - solid cover for the back four but uncharacteristically gave the ball away quite a bit up-field
Dayton - n/a - was his usual anonymous self for the last 80 minutes
Clay - 8 - MOM. all over the pitch, protecting Brophy and the centre backs but was also willing to support our attack. Excellent assist for the goal
Dennis - 5 - once Happe went off and they put him in the centre he contributed very little and probably should have come off at half time
Wilkinson - 6.5 - if only he had half a yard extra pace we would have won the game late on. worked hard but had very little space
Johnson - 7 - you knew once he got the ball the equaliser was a formality. Worked really hard up front
Widdowson - 7 - the right decision to bring him on early and did his job
McAnuff - 7 - should have come on earlier, the midfield looked a lot more solid after he came on
Akinola - 7 - lot less crosses came in after he came on, do I need to say anymore?
Dennis - 5 - once Happe went off and they put him in the centre he contributed very little and probably should have come off at half time
=====================================================
Except for the all important tackle on the halfway line which directly led to our goal......