Page 88 of 97
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:13 am
by Hoover Attack
What possible crank conspiracies could there be? Isn't it clear what Kier did and why?
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:14 am
by Currywurst and Chips
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:13 am
What possible crank conspiracies could there be? Isn't it clear what Kier did and why?
When has common sense and glaringly self evident facts stopped them in the past?
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:23 am
by BoniO
Betty Boothroyd would have sorted them out.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:37 am
by E10EU
faldO wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 8:19 am
Wouldn't surprise me if Hoyle resigns over the "shenanigans" yesterday.
It seems Starmer told Hoyle to allow the Labour amendment because his MPs are being threatened and he was concerned about their security. (
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ote-crisis). Threats of violence to MPs - shocking though they are - should not be allowed to dictate how parliament works.
There was even a suggestion on Newsnight last night that Hoyle was told he wouldn't have Labour support to continue as Speaker after the next election and/or go to the house of Lords once his time as speaker is over, unless he did what Starmer was asking.
Should be an interesting day...
Using the alledged 'threats made to Labour MPs' as justification for pushing Hoyle to act in Party-political interest is very dirty.
The real reason why Hoyle was bullied into this course of action was to prevent Starmer getting embarrassed by a large number of Labour MPs voting for the SNP amendment.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:46 am
by Friend or faux
The use of Parliamentary motions that have absolutely no effect on the troubles Israel/Palestinians, in order to embarrass Labour was a cynical ploy by the Scots Nats , who are in tons of trouble. On the same Newsnight, Victoria Derbyshire made mincemeat of the Scots Nat bod. All 3 Parties come out of this nonsense very badly indeed
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:56 am
by Dunners
Also, LOL at how nobody give a f*ck about the Lib Dem position on this issue.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:09 am
by Admin
Dunners wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:56 am
Also, LOL at how nobody give a f*ck about the Lib Dem position on this issue.
They had one?
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:10 am
by Proposition Joe
Genuinely haven't heard the yellow Tories mentioned in ages, only through Ed Davey's slipperiness over the Post Office Horizon scandal.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:11 am
by Hoover Attack
I saw footage somewhere recently of a young man walking in front of - I believe - Nick Clegg, and then his pants fell down. I had forgotten about them up until that point.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:12 am
by Hoover Attack
The young man's pants fell down, not Nick Cleggs.
I suspect it was deliberate, as one of those prank things that the youngsters are fond of.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:16 am
by Long slender neck
Replying to your own posts now? Hmmm
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:18 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
Thing is, the electorate couldn’t give a sh*t who the speaker is and certainly don’t understand wtf happened last night, nevermind care.
Still, good to see all sides using people dying as a political football.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:26 am
by Hoover Attack
Well yes, I wanted to clarify my poorly worded post.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:26 am
by Hoover Attack
Oh did you now, chinny reckon...
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:26 am
by CEB
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:11 am
I saw footage somewhere recently of a young man walking in front of - I believe - Nick Clegg, and then his pants fell down. I had forgotten about them up until that point.
You’d forgotten about pants?
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:43 am
by faldO
"From The River To The Sea" projected onto Big Ben last night.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ebate.html
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:45 am
by Proposition Joe
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:18 am
Thing is, the electorate couldn’t give a sh*t who the speaker is and certainly don’t understand wtf happened last night, nevermind care.
Still, good to see all sides using people dying as a political football.
Saw one reporter say that a Tory minister told them "we're not as angry as we're pretending to be". Just the usual games from the usual dickheads but all even worse in an election year.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 12:01 pm
by Hoover Attack
The bastards also put up 'STOP THE BOMBS'. Sickos.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 12:02 pm
by CEB
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 12:01 pm
The bastards also put up 'STOP THE BOMBS'. Sickos.
Did it work?
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 12:33 pm
by Hoover Attack
Not yet.
I believe for their next protest they're going to start spamming third division football message boards with their slogans and see if that finds greater traction.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 12:39 pm
by CEB
If only the board had got their sh*t together in the transfer window, they could’ve been spamming second division boards instead. On such trifles do the tides of history turn.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 1:36 pm
by Hoover Attack
Mmmm, trifles.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 6:33 pm
by Dunners
LOL.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 6:55 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
Almost like appealing to a wide voter base instead of just a niche base works.
Re: Israel
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 7:24 pm
by Hoover Attack
‘Appealing’
