McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

User avatar
Bergen
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4310
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:07 pm
Has thanked: 377 times
Been thanked: 869 times

McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Bergen »

“I’m one of them who is uneasy about the risks connected with a return to action. It’s just hard to comprehend how it would actually work in practice. I can take the precautions I need to at home and…I’m doing what I need to do and trying to keep away from people. But the risk for me is just too high. That's the big problem with this virus. Nobody really knows exactly how people are contracting it, the ease of access and I think there are still too many questions, a lot more than we've got answers to at the While that remains the case, it's not safe to go back. I’ve got two kids. My parents are over seventy, so they are in that most at-risk group in terms of age. My mother-in-law who spends a lot of time with us, has had respiratory issues in the past. So she's very much in the high-risk category and I would certainly be very, very reluctant to go and put myself back in an environment where I could then potentially pass something on to my parents or my mother-in-law. So that will be a factor in my decision when I go back. And I know that's no different than many, many other footballers out there. It will be a key factor in when we do start back. I think footballers, will have a voice and rightfully so.”

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football ... r-21880592
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Whilst he has a valid point, his parents and his mother in law have bugger all to do with anything. He shouldn’t be seeing them.
LittleMate
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3307
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:03 pm
Has thanked: 1734 times
Been thanked: 938 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by LittleMate »

RedO wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 7:56 pm Whilst he has a valid point, his parents and his mother in law have bugger all to do with anything. He shouldn’t be seeing them.
I think he's talking about when he's asked to go back and not now.

It actually brings up a bigger issue, that there may be players who refuse to play because of health issues in and around their immediate family. Footballers and their families are not immune to life's issues and frailties and so I can see a few stepping back from playing and becoming "conscientious objectors".
User avatar
Bergen
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4310
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:07 pm
Has thanked: 377 times
Been thanked: 869 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Bergen »

We are talking about playing the final games behind closed doors as some kind of easy solution, but it might not be so easy for the players. I think we have to respect that.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by tuffers#1 »

Also the fact that BMER seem very susceptible I can understand his reasons to not want to play
User avatar
StillSpike
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4367
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 pm
Has thanked: 540 times
Been thanked: 1270 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by StillSpike »

Is there even a testing regime that can get answers back quickly enough to state that a training session is safe to start, or a match?

Everyone in the session or match - players, officials, management, medics, analysts etc - must be given the green light as clear at the start of the session or match - not from the night before, or the start of the week, but from tests carried out when they all turn up that day, but before they break distancing.
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Disoriented »

Bergen wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 8:31 pm We are talking about playing the final games behind closed doors as some kind of easy solution, but it might not be so easy for the players. I think we have to respect that.
Correct. There is zero chance of supporters attending any big sport in 2020.

Zero.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Disoriented wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:01 pm
Bergen wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 8:31 pm We are talking about playing the final games behind closed doors as some kind of easy solution, but it might not be so easy for the players. I think we have to respect that.
Correct. There is zero chance of supporters attending any big sport in 2020.

Zero.
I went to Cheltenham in March, does that not count?
Chicken Dhansak
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1657
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:14 pm
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 483 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Chicken Dhansak »

It would help an awful lot if they could stop footballers spitting and gobbing all over the place whilst on the pitch.
It is a disgusting practice anyway, would anybody on here like to be walking down a street with people spitting all over the
place all the time, I know I wouldn't.
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Disoriented »

RedO wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:24 pm
Disoriented wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:01 pm
Bergen wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 8:31 pm We are talking about playing the final games behind closed doors as some kind of easy solution, but it might not be so easy for the players. I think we have to respect that.
Correct. There is zero chance of supporters attending any big sport in 2020.

Zero.
I went to Cheltenham in March, does that not count?
Really? How many infections do you have on your conscience then?
BIGRON
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10310
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:59 pm
Has thanked: 247 times
Been thanked: 926 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by BIGRON »

Don't blame Jobi one bit , nobody's missing the pub More than me but I for one won't be going near one for a long time after this shits over 🤔🤔
Adz
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2738
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
Has thanked: 113 times
Been thanked: 652 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Adz »

If everyone else is returning to the workplace then football players have no excuse. If it is just them, then fair enough.
moonwalk19
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1326
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:06 pm
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 274 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by moonwalk19 »

Disoriented wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:48 pm
RedO wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:24 pm
Disoriented wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:01 pm

Correct. There is zero chance of supporters attending any big sport in 2020.

Zero.
I went to Cheltenham in March, does that not count?
Really? How many infections do you have on your conscience then?
The fact that the government allowed Cheltenham to take place is one of the many mistakes they have made in this terrible crises. As for the Football Ass. and FIFA allowing 3000 Athletico Madrid supporters coming to Liverpool during the time when the outbreak in Madrid was rampant was appalling. Nobody has ever taken responsibility for these actions and said.WE GOT IT WRONG.
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Disoriented »

moonwalk19 wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 4:50 am
Disoriented wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:48 pm
RedO wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:24 pm

I went to Cheltenham in March, does that not count?
Really? How many infections do you have on your conscience then?
The fact that the government allowed Cheltenham to take place is one of the many mistakes they have made in this terrible crises. As for the Football Ass. and FIFA allowing 3000 Athletico Madrid supporters coming to Liverpool during the time when the outbreak in Madrid was rampant was appalling. Nobody has ever taken responsibility for these actions and said.WE GOT IT WRONG.
You are so right. Macron has admitted mistakes. Why can’t Johnson and the rest?
moonwalk19
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1326
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:06 pm
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 274 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by moonwalk19 »

Disoriented wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 7:27 am
moonwalk19 wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 4:50 am
Disoriented wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:48 pm

Really? How many infections do you have on your conscience then?
The fact that the government allowed Cheltenham to take place is one of the many mistakes they have made in this terrible crises. As for the Football Ass. and FIFA allowing 3000 Athletico Madrid supporters coming to Liverpool during the time when the outbreak in Madrid was rampant was appalling. Nobody has ever taken responsibility for these actions and said.WE GOT IT WRONG.
You are so right. Macron has admitted mistakes. Why can’t Johnson and the rest?
Just listened to Piers Morgan interview the Culture secretary . He put all the points above to him and he could not truefully answer anything. He consistantely stated that they followed the science. This really agitates me as if you include deaths in Care homes we have possibly the second highest deaths in the world.Not something to be proud of. It’s about time we use common sense Government GET A GRIP
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

The scientific advisers are already taking the wrap for this. Blimey.
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Disoriented »

moonwalk19 wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 9:06 am
Disoriented wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 7:27 am
moonwalk19 wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 4:50 am

The fact that the government allowed Cheltenham to take place is one of the many mistakes they have made in this terrible crises. As for the Football Ass. and FIFA allowing 3000 Athletico Madrid supporters coming to Liverpool during the time when the outbreak in Madrid was rampant was appalling. Nobody has ever taken responsibility for these actions and said.WE GOT IT WRONG.
You are so right. Macron has admitted mistakes. Why can’t Johnson and the rest?
Just listened to Piers Morgan interview the Culture secretary . He put all the points above to him and he could not truefully answer anything. He consistantely stated that they followed the science. This really agitates me as if you include deaths in Care homes we have possibly the second highest deaths in the world.Not something to be proud of. It’s about time we use common sense Government GET A GRIP
Right again. Still cannot understand why the government refuse to tell the truth about the number of fatalities. They are becoming more untrustworthy than China.
moonwalk19
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1326
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:06 pm
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 274 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by moonwalk19 »

RedO wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 9:21 am The scientific advisers are already taking the wrap for this. Blimey.
Already taking the wrap that’s a laugh. Keep showing us graphs that are baffling to the public. We are on a rudderless ship heading towards the rocks. Makes me so mad I could cry.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Disoriented wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 7:27 am
moonwalk19 wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 4:50 am
Disoriented wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:48 pm

Really? How many infections do you have on your conscience then?
The fact that the government allowed Cheltenham to take place is one of the many mistakes they have made in this terrible crises. As for the Football Ass. and FIFA allowing 3000 Athletico Madrid supporters coming to Liverpool during the time when the outbreak in Madrid was rampant was appalling. Nobody has ever taken responsibility for these actions and said.WE GOT IT WRONG.
You are so right. Macron has admitted mistakes. Why can’t Johnson and the rest?
They believe they are Ubermensch. They don't make mistakes.
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Disoriented »

RedO wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 9:50 am
Disoriented wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 7:27 am
moonwalk19 wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 4:50 am

The fact that the government allowed Cheltenham to take place is one of the many mistakes they have made in this terrible crises. As for the Football Ass. and FIFA allowing 3000 Athletico Madrid supporters coming to Liverpool during the time when the outbreak in Madrid was rampant was appalling. Nobody has ever taken responsibility for these actions and said.WE GOT IT WRONG.
You are so right. Macron has admitted mistakes. Why can’t Johnson and the rest?
They believe they are Ubermensch. They don't make mistakes.
A definite bunch of alter wichsers.
Ornchurch
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1581
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:21 pm
Has thanked: 243 times
Been thanked: 267 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Ornchurch »

Adz wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 11:47 pm If everyone else is returning to the workplace then football players have no excuse. If it is just them, then fair enough.
I don't think that others returning to the workplace are expected to get quite as close to their peers as footballers :lol:
Ornchurch
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1581
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:21 pm
Has thanked: 243 times
Been thanked: 267 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Ornchurch »

moonwalk19 wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 4:50 am
Disoriented wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:48 pm
RedO wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:24 pm

I went to Cheltenham in March, does that not count?
Really? How many infections do you have on your conscience then?
The fact that the government allowed Cheltenham to take place is one of the many mistakes they have made in this terrible crises. As for the Football Ass. and FIFA allowing 3000 Athletico Madrid supporters coming to Liverpool during the time when the outbreak in Madrid was rampant was appalling. Nobody has ever taken responsibility for these actions and said.WE GOT IT WRONG.
I agree with the above but why does nobody take responsibility for their own actions.
No one was forced to go to Cheltenham. People had the right to think that it was risky and make the decision to stay at home.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Ornchurch wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 10:27 am
Adz wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 11:47 pm If everyone else is returning to the workplace then football players have no excuse. If it is just them, then fair enough.
I don't think that others returning to the workplace are expected to get quite as close to their peers as footballers :lol:
Have you not seen our defending this year?
User avatar
StillSpike
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4367
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 pm
Has thanked: 540 times
Been thanked: 1270 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by StillSpike »

Ornchurch wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 10:31 am
moonwalk19 wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 4:50 am
Disoriented wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:48 pm

Really? How many infections do you have on your conscience then?
The fact that the government allowed Cheltenham to take place is one of the many mistakes they have made in this terrible crises. As for the Football Ass. and FIFA allowing 3000 Athletico Madrid supporters coming to Liverpool during the time when the outbreak in Madrid was rampant was appalling. Nobody has ever taken responsibility for these actions and said.WE GOT IT WRONG.
I agree with the above but why does nobody take responsibility for their own actions.
No one was forced to go to Cheltenham. People had the right to think that it was risky and make the decision to stay at home.
I know what you mean, but in this case I disagree that it was a situation where personal responsibility could or should have been relied upon.

The Government kept up the line about "advising" and "strongly advising" us all to stay in and not go to the pub, the restaurant, Cheltenham etc, but without closing them down for those vital days and weeks. The message was always framed as advice, and advice means you can take it or leave it - it's up to you, it's your choice (that word so favoured by free-marketeers).

Many people, including friends of mine, took this to mean that they were taking a decision about their own personal safety and health, rather than the effect they might have on others. That's why folk still went out, they knew of a risk to themselves, and took a judgement that they were prepared to run that risk. The Government should have made clear - by closing pubs etc, and Cheltenham - that the distancing measures were about protecting others, not yourself. That should not be left to choice.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9631
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1170 times
Been thanked: 2652 times

Re: McAnuff uneasy about a return to action

Post by Dunners »

moonwalk19 wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 9:35 am
RedO wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2020 9:21 am The scientific advisers are already taking the wrap for this. Blimey.
Already taking the wrap that’s a laugh. Keep showing us graphs that are baffling to the public. We are on a rudderless ship heading towards the rocks. Makes me so mad I could cry.
To be fair, the media pressed for these daily briefings, so they feel they have to fill them with something. Some people may find the graphs baffling, and others may not. But the graphs are merely presenting a visual interpretation of the data. I'm not sure what else the scientific advisors should be doing.

As for the rudderless ship comment - that's fair enough. But it's not the job of the scientific advisors to steer the ship - that's what Government ministers and the PM should be doing.
Post Reply