Page 1 of 2

Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 4:53 pm
by tuffers#1
Lots of bluster in the cockhat area
Drossinterest & Eagwagwawawa
Wumblemania will be in full effect
Also blowing huge gusts of bluster


(Sid Bishop
RedDwarf1881
Disoriented
gshaw
Huxley
cockhat
Apple Wumble
eagwgw
Chief crazy horse
ComeOnYouOs
BiggsyMalone
PoundhillO) ( from post a lot less when we win-d thread )

For the rest of us Storm Dennis is the least of our worries

Expect 30 threads of wet windy storms
Each thread much the same as the other.

How many times will storm thory change his mind ?

HOWLING mad murdoch
He certainly will be .

Hey Hunny im Going to blow your home down

Take cover all & best of British

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 4:57 pm
by tuffers#1
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3438

Just knew he would be 1st

Bravo Cockhat bravo
šŸ‘šŸ‘šŸ‘

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 4:58 pm
by Lovejoy
cockhat is saying nothing, he has blown off!

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:34 pm
by kokomO
Same old same old, we are where we because we're šŸ’©

Luckily this season we're in a league where there are a few teams more šŸ’© than us.

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:36 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Might do a similar thread about all the sh*t you will post in a week after we scrape a 1-0 win against a team 2nd bottom.

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:38 pm
by tuffers#1
Remember your a wumble
Only good for picking up rubbish
šŸ˜

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:48 pm
by MrB
Earache because simply there was absolutely nothing to be positive about particularly in the second half.Just kept inviting them to Score,which they in ultimately did.

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:55 pm
by Thor
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:56 pm
by MrB
Thor wrote: ā†‘Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:55 pm ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
Iā€™d sing along Thor but I donā€™t know the words!!

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:03 pm
by Thor
It was for tuffers benefit in case he forgot them from last week.

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:07 pm
by tuffers#1
MrB wrote: ā†‘Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:56 pm
Thor wrote: ā†‘Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:55 pm ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
Iā€™d sing along Thor but I donā€™t know the words!!
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON
Just for you Mr B

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:08 pm
by MrB
Still donā€™t know the words

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:12 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: ā†‘Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:03 pm It was for tuffers benefit in case he forgot them from last week.

ThorLevel Five Boarder

Last NightReportQuoteThanks

PostĀ Wed Feb 12, 2020 9:17 pm

Credit to Ross he proved me wrong by showing he does have the minerals to drop Wright, which I do beleive was the right decision.

I wanted to discuss amongst fellow fans what I beleive I saw last night. I liked the possession football we played, we controlled the tempo (Iā€™ll come back to this point) we moved it around quite well and I read that we had something like 70% possession in the first half. Could well be true and if it was correct thatā€™s impressive. So to me there was a big improvement in keeping the ball, keeping it on the floor and moving it from right to left and vice a versa. However, the tempo was way to slow for what we were trying to do. If we are to play that style then we need to move the ball quicker, it needs to ping in quickly to the players and by that quick movement will allow us to stretch the play, create space and then allow us to play through the gaps we create. By moving the ball in the slow manner we did allowed them to get back behind he ball and nullify what we were trying to do. If we had moved with pace we could have been five up with that sort of possession stat.

A lot of negative things have been said about our play recently and Iā€™ll say that Iā€™ve said that myself however, Iā€™m starting to see a pattern to our play and an identity, whilst itā€™s still early days you can see the progression Ross the boss is trying to formulate. He still needs to work on it and speed of movement of the ball and the players should be the next thing he works on. Playing a better team than last night would be an issue if we are that slow against such a team as they will be able to nullify us even easier than what we saw last night.

So for me itā€™s a step in the right direction and I hope to see further work on the shape, the pattern of play and tactics in the coming games.

* * * *

Changed your mind again Thor ?

You are like a bit of tissue blowing in the wind
This way 1 second that way the next .

Im suprised you know who you are at all , trying to please everyone .

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:13 pm
by tuffers#1
MrB wrote: ā†‘Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:08 pm Still donā€™t know the words
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETONĀ 
ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON ROSS EMBLETON

Ill keep posting them till you can grasp them
šŸ˜

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:14 pm
by MrB
Ok

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:20 pm
by Thor
I have not changed my mind as I never saw the game today, but what I said last week still stands. Iā€™ve not slagged him off nor the team today.

Still if you reflect on what I said, itā€™s a step in the right direction. Today it would appear from what others who were at the game posted that we lost due to the tactics employed and the substitutions played a part in the defeat by bringing them on to us.

So it would appear weā€™ve taken one step forwards and two steps back so to speak. The issue that we have or the team has or the club has, is Ross learning quickly enough on the job?

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:01 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: ā†‘Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:20 pm I have not changed my mind as I never saw the game today, but what I said last week still stands. Iā€™ve not slagged him off nor the team today.

Still if you reflect on what I said, itā€™s a step in the right direction. Today it would appear from what others who were at the game posted that we lost due to the tactics employed and the substitutions played a part in the defeat by bringing them on to us.

So it would appear weā€™ve taken one step forwards and two steps back so to speak. The issue that we have or the team has or the club has, is Ross learning quickly enough on the job?
Nothing to do with playing the team with the best defence in the league &
Joint 1st on Goal difference +21 ?


These fans talk about being realistic .

Then be realistic .

We have an average squad that needs massive improvement for next season.

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:10 pm
by Thor
Not necessarily tuffers, weā€™ve upgraded the players with the ones that came in. Letā€™s hope they can convince Cisse to stay longer. Maybe a couple of more in the summer wouldnā€™t go a miss, but it looks like a tactical change to 3 at the back and one up top cost us dearly. Thatā€™s not about the players thatā€™s about tactics and what youā€™re asking them to do.

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:16 pm
by tuffers#1
Thor wrote: ā†‘Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:10 pm Not necessarily tuffers, weā€™ve upgraded the players with the ones that came in. Letā€™s hope they can convince Cisse to stay longer. Maybe a couple of more in the summer wouldnā€™t go a miss, but it looks like a tactical change to 3 at the back and one up top cost us dearly. Thatā€™s not about the players thatā€™s about tactics and what youā€™re asking them to do.
A couple of new players on loan isnt what im talkin about thory,

We need bigger stronger & faster .
Who can compete for 90 minutes in league football.

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:28 pm
by slacker
Great thread title, tuffers. :lol:

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:30 pm
by Thor
We never had in my view a proper preseason. Weā€™ve not been fit enough all year. The fact ling changed all that team says something to me about continuity. Itā€™s no coincidence we were probably the fittest team in the national league, this year we are probably the unfittest in the league. Itā€™s about circumstances.

Iā€™m sure with a settled preseason next time around things will be different.

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:45 pm
by Long slender neck
Thor wrote: ā†‘Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:10 pm Not necessarily tuffers, weā€™ve upgraded the players with the ones that came in. Letā€™s hope they can convince Cisse to stay longer. Maybe a couple of more in the summer wouldnā€™t go a miss, but it looks like a tactical change to 3 at the back and one up top cost us dearly. Thatā€™s not about the players thatā€™s about tactics and what youā€™re asking them to do.
We didn't go three at the back.

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:48 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
tuffers#1 wrote: ā†‘Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:01 pm
Thor wrote: ā†‘Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:20 pm I have not changed my mind as I never saw the game today, but what I said last week still stands. Iā€™ve not slagged him off nor the team today.

Still if you reflect on what I said, itā€™s a step in the right direction. Today it would appear from what others who were at the game posted that we lost due to the tactics employed and the substitutions played a part in the defeat by bringing them on to us.

So it would appear weā€™ve taken one step forwards and two steps back so to speak. The issue that we have or the team has or the club has, is Ross learning quickly enough on the job?
Nothing to do with playing the team with the best defence in the league &
Joint 1st on Goal difference +21 ?


These fans talk about being realistic .

Then be realistic .

We have an average squad that needs massive improvement for next season.
So who should we blame for having an average squad?

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 8:00 pm
by Thor
Prestige Worldwide wrote: ā†‘Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:45 pm
Thor wrote: ā†‘Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:10 pm Not necessarily tuffers, weā€™ve upgraded the players with the ones that came in. Letā€™s hope they can convince Cisse to stay longer. Maybe a couple of more in the summer wouldnā€™t go a miss, but it looks like a tactical change to 3 at the back and one up top cost us dearly. Thatā€™s not about the players thatā€™s about tactics and what youā€™re asking them to do.
We didn't go three at the back.
Someone on here said we did and Ross says in his interview that joe played on the right of a three. Why he played him on the right of a three is for him to consider although he did offer an explanation about pace down that side so maybe it has merits?

Re: Storm Earache follows Storm Dennis

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 8:06 pm
by Long slender neck
Not how I saw it, no idea why he'd describe it that way.