Independent Leyton Orient Forum

Make what you will of 2 mins 9 secs of football action

As someone said on anothet thread Sargeant has made it easy for Embleton to swap him out for Vigoroux next game. Neither here nor there for the goal.

Pure panic from the Grimsby player for the pen, Clay had 6 in front of him - shot wouldn't have got through

gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:28 am As someone said on anothet thread Sargeant has made it easy for Embleton to swap him out for Vigoroux next game. Neither here nor there for the goal.

Pure panic from the Grimsby player for the pen, Clay had 6 in front of him - shot wouldn't have got through

So now your blaming Sargeant for the goal?
Didn’t have any cover what was he supposed to do

gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:28 am As someone said on anothet thread Sargeant has made it easy for Embleton to swap him out for Vigoroux next game. Neither here nor there for the goal.

Pure panic from the Grimsby player for the pen, Clay had 6 in front of him - shot wouldn't have got through

Clay can’t shoot straight anyway

Now I've seen it again, I think it was partially Sergeant's fault. It's a terrible error from Brophy in the first instance but if Sergeant simply stays on his line that doesn't go in. It was poor judgement particularly as the ball was bouncing. Think Vigoroux should start next week

Lucky7 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:40 am

gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:28 am As someone said on anothet thread Sargeant has made it easy for Embleton to swap him out for Vigoroux next game. Neither here nor there for the goal.

Pure panic from the Grimsby player for the pen, Clay had 6 in front of him - shot wouldn't have got through

So now your blaming Sargeant for the goal?
Didn’t have any cover what was he supposed to do

There are lots of people at fault for their goal. Sarge played his part by stepping into no mans land.

Wilkinson and the player for the penalty is hilarious, he trys blocking Wilkinson, Wilkinson then trys yanking his arm out its socket

Jman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:52 am Now I've seen it again, I think it was partially Sergeant's fault. It's a terrible error from Brophy in the first instance but if Sergeant simply stays on his line that doesn't go in. It was poor judgement particularly as the ball was bouncing. Think Vigoroux should start next week

Lol one mistake that wasn’t really his fault and leave the kid hang out to dry

I wish my life was so perfect as some of the boarders portray on here

Lucky7 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:10 pm

Jman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:52 am Now I've seen it again, I think it was partially Sergeant's fault. It's a terrible error from Brophy in the first instance but if Sergeant simply stays on his line that doesn't go in. It was poor judgement particularly as the ball was bouncing. Think Vigoroux should start next week

Lol one mistake that wasn’t really his fault and leave the kid hang out to dry

I wish my life was so perfect as some of the boarders portray on here

What a weird response. I'm simply saying it as it is, not hanging him out to dry. You've even just said yourself it was a mistake. Bizarre.

Jman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:14 pm

Lucky7 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:10 pm

Jman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:52 am Now I've seen it again, I think it was partially Sergeant's fault. It's a terrible error from Brophy in the first instance but if Sergeant simply stays on his line that doesn't go in. It was poor judgement particularly as the ball was bouncing. Think Vigoroux should start next week

Lol one mistake that wasn’t really his fault and leave the kid hang out to dry

I wish my life was so perfect as some of the boarders portray on here

What a weird response. I'm simply saying it as it is, not hanging him out to dry. You've even just said yourself it was a mistake. Bizarre.

if Sergeant simply stays on his line that doesn't go in. It was poor judgement particularly as the ball was bouncing. Think Vigoroux should start next week

^^^^^^^^^^^^
You sure your not hanging him out to dry?

I think it is a point
It was a bouncing ball, easy for a lob. If the keeper stays put, the attacker has more to do with a defender, Happe, coming over as well. Virtually any player could have scored with a lob in that position. Its not hanging a keeper out to dry,but he made it easy for the attacker

Had Sargeant not come out like that, the Grimsby player wouldnt have been able to chip/lob it past him, but he still would probably have scored, by blasting it, or putting it wide of him.
Having said that, Sargeant does make some bed decisions, and I reckon he'll not be retained in the summer

ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:05 pm Had Sargeant not come out like that, the Grimsby player wouldnt have been able to chip/lob it past him, but he still would probably have scored, by blasting it, or putting it wide of him.
Having said that, Sargeant does make some bed decisions, and I reckon he'll not be retained in the summer

What do you know about his bed habits COYOS
Jeez your a wrong un!!!

RedO wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:05 pm

Lucky7 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:40 am

gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:28 am As someone said on anothet thread Sargeant has made it easy for Embleton to swap him out for Vigoroux next game. Neither here nor there for the goal.

Pure panic from the Grimsby player for the pen, Clay had 6 in front of him - shot wouldn't have got through

So now your blaming Sargeant for the goal?
Didn’t have any cover what was he supposed to do

There are lots of people at fault for their goal. Sarge played his part by stepping into no mans land.

Yep. Error from Brophy, poor positioning from Coulson and Happe and Sargeant totally indecisive and made the wrong choice.

All of that, SF.

I’d also include Wright, Clay and Marsh in that for failing to show for Brophy. Something Hector would have done.

In those highlights, they show the one decent save their keeper made. Have a look at Brophy running with the ball, just before he lays it off to JMD who puts in a great cross, he has four men around him. That means we have 3 spare players somewhere, all doing f*** all.

(To be fair to Clay, when he came on he was up for it and was getting involved but that was in more advanced positions, I’m talking about someone coming deep and demanding the ball from the centre halves and fullbacks. Something only Hector will do out of our lot).

Lucky7 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:51 pm

Jman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:14 pm

Lucky7 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:10 pm

Lol one mistake that wasn’t really his fault and leave the kid hang out to dry

I wish my life was so perfect as some of the boarders portray on here

What a weird response. I'm simply saying it as it is, not hanging him out to dry. You've even just said yourself it was a mistake. Bizarre.

if Sergeant simply stays on his line that doesn't go in. It was poor judgement particularly as the ball was bouncing. Think Vigoroux should start next week

^^^^^^^^^^^^
You sure your not hanging him out to dry?

It was a mistake. He knows it. Everyone knows it. No one is hanging him out to dry.

As an ex goalkeeper first instinct is to come out and narrow the angle. you're damned if you do ,damned if you dont

RedO wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:32 pm

Lucky7 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:51 pm

Jman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:14 pm

What a weird response. I'm simply saying it as it is, not hanging him out to dry. You've even just said yourself it was a mistake. Bizarre.

if Sergeant simply stays on his line that doesn't go in. It was poor judgement particularly as the ball was bouncing. Think Vigoroux should start next week

^^^^^^^^^^^^
You sure your not hanging him out to dry?

It was a mistake. He knows it. Everyone knows it. No one is hanging him out to dry.

Think Vigoroux should start next week

No???

If vigoroux is the much better player, then of course he should.

RedO wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 3:09 pm If vigoroux is the much better player, then of course he should.

Wether he should or shouldn't I don't know , i wouldn't mind having a bet his clearance ain't through next week

BIGRON wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 3:48 pm

RedO wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 3:09 pm If vigoroux is the much better player, then of course he should.

Wether he should or shouldn't I don't know , i wouldn't mind having a bet his clearance ain't through next week

That will be embarrassing for a certain DoF. Sargeant needed a flawless game yesterday to retain his place against the new signing but think the goal will make Embleton's decision a lot easier. Just how it is, and how it should be... two players pushing each other for the #1 spot.

POSHO wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:00 pm I think it is a point
It was a bouncing ball, easy for a lob. If the keeper stays put, the attacker has more to do with a defender, Happe, coming over as well. Virtually any player could have scored with a lob in that position. Its not hanging a keeper out to dry,but he made it easy for the attacker

I agree with this

Lucky7 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:10 pm

Jman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:52 am Now I've seen it again, I think it was partially Sergeant's fault. It's a terrible error from Brophy in the first instance but if Sergeant simply stays on his line that doesn't go in. It was poor judgement particularly as the ball was bouncing. Think Vigoroux should start next week

Lol one mistake that wasn’t really his fault and leave the kid hang out to dry

I wish my life was so perfect as some of the boarders portray on here

Clearly, as managing the past lives of sadistic thugs must be taxing on you.