Page 1 of 1

We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:25 pm
by cockhat
And still find a way to lose!

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:26 pm
by Born to run
Embleton, would still only play one of them, up front

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:28 pm
by Howling Mad Murdock
Good god,we are rubbish.

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:28 pm
by gshaw
At least 5 would get hamstring injuries in the warmup though

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:29 pm
by cockhat
Born to run wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:26 pm Embleton, would still only play one of them, up front
πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:30 pm
by Howling Mad Murdock
10-10-1

I reckon we'd win.

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:32 pm
by cockhat
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:30 pm 10-10-1

I reckon we'd win.
nah, we’d have trouble finding someone to pass to!πŸ˜€

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:35 pm
by MrB
cockhat wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:32 pm
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:30 pm 10-10-1

I reckon we'd win.
nah, we’d have trouble finding someone to pass to!πŸ˜€
:lol: :lol: and still manage give it to the opposition

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:36 pm
by MrB
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:28 pm Good god,we are rubbish.
Hey! We aren’t that good!

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:37 pm
by Howling Mad Murdock
We did beat Cambridge which was a surprise.

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:22 pm
by Thor
We are a poor side due to the interim head coaches lack of ability to lead the team.

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:32 pm
by PoundhillO
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:37 pm We did beat Cambridge which was a surprise.
Think that was a fluke, having been 3-0 up we managed to cling on after conceding 2 goals, says it all really.

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:41 pm
by Smendrick Feaselberg
PoundhillO wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:32 pm
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:37 pm We did beat Cambridge which was a surprise.
Think that was a fluke, having been 3-0 up we managed to cling on after conceding 2 goals, says it all really.
Says what? That we beat Cambridge. Ok...

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:01 pm
by Lovejoy
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:37 pm We did beat Cambridge which was a surprise.
Cambridge lost 4-0 today which may put that result into perspective.

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 12:03 am
by MrB
Lovejoy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:01 pm
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:37 pm We did beat Cambridge which was a surprise.
Cambridge lost 4-0 today which may put that result into perspective.
And once again they were 3 down at half time

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 11:07 am
by banqo
..... and still not have a midfield!

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 11:24 am
by essexfootball
Beat Cambridge due to set pieces, free kick, free kick goal, pen, there is no goals from open play, the most likely to score from open play looks to be JMD or even Wright, Brophy carries no real goal threat, Angol doesn't seem to be a goal machine, Harrold isn't. Wilkinson is the most natrual goal scorer in the squad

Re: We could field 22 players

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 12:00 pm
by Disoriented
essexfootball wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2019 11:24 am Beat Cambridge due to set pieces, free kick, free kick goal, pen, there is no goals from open play, the most likely to score from open play looks to be JMD or even Wright, Brophy carries no real goal threat, Angol doesn't seem to be a goal machine, Harrold isn't. Wilkinson is the most natrual goal scorer in the squad
All true sadly.