Page 1 of 2
Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:24 pm
by Fanny
Sargent - 7. really good in the first half. Let two in but I’m not sure how many were his fault. Needs to learn how to time waste a bit better. Surely number 1 over Brill now.
Turley - 8. Scored a goal. Solid CB. But carded and gave away pen. Like Sargent, surely a first teamer from now on
Marvin- 7. Better than he’s been recently.
Happe - 7. Usual composed self.
Judd - 5. Really ropey. Kicking all over the place. Unlucky to get sent off but still not an improvement on Sam Ling, really.
Marsh - 6 decent shift.
JMD. 7. Belting free kick. Get a 7 for that alone.
Wright - 7. Lucky that the pen save ended up at his feet. Otherwise a decent and solid performance. He gets stick from some on here but he’s a decent CM.
Clay - 6. Usual stuff. Persistent moaning.
Brophy - 5. Didn’t even realise he was on the pitch
Angol - 6. Bashed all over the place and was unlucky at times. This type of game didn’t really suit him. Should have scored when through on goal.
Subs.
Harold -7. I’m basing this score purely on the fact that his job was to hold the ball up and waste time. He did it well.
Kyprianou - 5. Not a criticism but he didn’t do anything, not that he had a chance to.
Coulson - n/a. Nice to see him get a warm welcome brim Cambridge fans. Saw him talking to some Cambridge kids whilst warming up too. Nice guy.
As always, feel free to disagree
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:27 pm
by gshaw
Huxley wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:24 pm
Wilkinson - 5. Didn’t even realise he was on the pitch
Because he wasn't...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9faab/9faab2fdf02f55b8ff7a9c4e603cfcc58763eaf7" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:30 pm
by Fanny
gshaw wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:27 pm
Huxley wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:24 pm
Wilkinson - 5. Didn’t even realise he was on the pitch
Because he wasn't...
LOL! That typo says it all. Thanks for pointing out.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2019 7:18 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Judd was superb again. A massive improvement on Ling. But he’s let himself down with two silly decisions. The second one wouldn’t have been a yellow if they hadn’t already gone down to 10.
Angol was brilliant again, too. But he can’t be expected to do it all on his own.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:07 pm
by Chief crazy horse
Blimey, what is it? One says Judd was ropey, kicking all over the place, another says he was 'superb!'
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:14 pm
by Howling Mad Murdock
Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:07 pm
Blimey, what is it? One says Judd was ropey, kicking all over the place, another says he was 'superb!'
Differing opinions.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:24 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:07 pm
Blimey, what is it? One says Judd was ropey, kicking all over the place, another says he was 'superb!'
I’m right. Bags of energy, aggressive, a really really good first half.
Spoilt it with one of his dive ins - you could see he wasn’t going to win it - then a silly pull back after losing the ball on the edge of their box.
You know he’ll get punished by the club for it, which is a real shame. He needs game time so he can get more experience and learn not to make these mistakes.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:25 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Also consider that the OP didn’t even realise Wilkinson wasn’t playing. That tells you all you need to know.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:38 pm
by Chief crazy horse
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:14 pm
Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:07 pm
Blimey, what is it? One says Judd was ropey, kicking all over the place, another says he was 'superb!'
Differing opinions.
Differing opinions? You can say that again!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59b1c/59b1c1eae3dad6cde22ff3b94e1fd59b9f2ceaea" alt="☺️"
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:45 pm
by Tom Chance
Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:38 pm
Howling Mad Murdock wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:14 pm
Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:07 pm
Blimey, what is it? One says Judd was ropey, kicking all over the place, another says he was 'superb!'
Differing opinions.
Differing opinions?
I thought differing opinions had been outlawed on here.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:27 am
by Fanny
RedO wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:25 pm
Also consider that the OP didn’t even realise Wilkinson wasn’t playing. That tells you all you need to know.
It tells you that the OP is human and makes typos.
And Judds kicking was all over the place.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:47 am
by Disoriented
Huxley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:27 am
RedO wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:25 pm
Also consider that the OP didn’t even realise Wilkinson wasn’t playing. That tells you all you need to know.
It tells you that the OP is human and makes typos.
And Judds kicking was all over the place.
As is your analysis.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:07 am
by Fanny
Disoriented wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:47 am
Huxley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:27 am
RedO wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:25 pm
Also consider that the OP didn’t even realise Wilkinson wasn’t playing. That tells you all you need to know.
It tells you that the OP is human and makes typos.
And Judds kicking was all over the place.
As is your analysis.
Maybe so.
It’s just my opinion. People are welcome to challenge it.
Which bits in particular do you not agree with?
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:08 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Huxley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:27 am
RedO wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 9:25 pm
Also consider that the OP didn’t even realise Wilkinson wasn’t playing. That tells you all you need to know.
It tells you that the OP is human and makes typos.
And Judds kicking was all over the place.
A typo???
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3988b/3988b84dedadeb791dbe667c35e342a0ab0e7bb7" alt="😂"
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:08 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
To be fair, Judd didn’t find Wilkinson once all game.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:13 am
by Fanny
RedO wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:08 am
To be fair, Judd didn’t find Wilkinson once all game.
Maybe that’s why he kept booting it into the stands. He was trying to pick out Wilko!
By the way, having seen the incident close up in the highlights his sending off was ludicrous. The club have to appeal that, if they can.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:14 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Huxley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:13 am
RedO wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:08 am
To be fair, Judd didn’t find Wilkinson once all game.
Maybe that’s why he kept booting it into the stands. He was trying to pick out Wilko!
Can’t appeal a yellow, unfortunately.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:19 am
by Fanny
RedO wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:14 am
Huxley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:13 am
RedO wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:08 am
To be fair, Judd didn’t find Wilkinson once all game.
Maybe that’s why he kept booting it into the stands. He was trying to pick out Wilko!
Can’t appeal a yellow, unfortunately.
Even if it leads to a red?
That’s a silly rule.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:30 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Aye but that’s how it is.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 11:02 am
by gshaw
Huxley wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:13 am
RedO wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:08 am
To be fair, Judd didn’t find Wilkinson once all game.
Maybe that’s why he kept booting it into the stands. He was trying to pick out Wilko!
By the way, having seen the incident close up in the highlights his sending off was ludicrous. The club have to appeal that, if they can.
I'm not actually surprised he got booked for that second one. Yes it's a pretty lame way to get sent off but he does rather cynically foul the guy to stop a breakaway, usually you take a booking on the chin for that. The fact he did it when already on a yellow not the brightest idea.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 11:50 am
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Not on the edge of the oppositions penalty box, you don't.
Still a silly decision. But then he's a kid who has had his game time restricted needlessly, so its not surprising.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 12:09 pm
by RealLoughtonO
Sounds like a reasonable game, watched the highlights, shame I missed it, went to Albion Rovers v Annan instead, good win for Rovers.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 12:51 pm
by Red_Army
Judd was very poor again I'm afraid. His one asset, his aggression, is his biggest weakness as of he gets beatej to the punch, he's in big trouble.
His sending off was the result of stupidly trying to take on their defenders when he could have played a simple ball back inside.
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 1:07 pm
by essexfootball
Sargent - 9 - couple of good saves second half
Turley - 7. Good movement for the goal, gave away the pen, apart from that defence looks far more solid with him
Marvin- 7. Looks far more at home with Turley
Happe - 7. Solid reliable, also covers across well when one of the CB's gets caught
Judd - 6. Said last week he plays like he has had too many lucozades and gets caught being too eager, i think his energy going forward is a lot better than Ling's though, he actually wants to go forward, strech the pitch, try crosses
Marsh - 6 - solid enough, stupid booking
JMD. 8 - Honestly don't get how he doesn't start every game, only player in the squad who can do certain things, free kick for the first goal, brillant goal from the other free kick and went close as well when cutting in at one point, he needs to be on the pitch for his quality of crosses and he can pinch the odd goal
Wright - 7. Solid performance
Clay - 6. Same as Wright really, solid
Brophy - 6 - Thought he stretched the pitch well and his pace kept the defender back,
Angol - 6.5 - Worked hard up front, had a great chance to score, just needs to show a bit more of a goal instinct, few chances last few games you would expect a striker to steal a goal
Subs.
Harold -7. Came on held the ball up
Kyprianou - 5. Played a delightful ball to Cray
Coulson - n/a. Came on as defensive reenforcment
Re: Ratings v Cambridge
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 1:39 pm
by BIGRON
I would duck Judd a couple of points for getting sent off , totally unnecessary and unprofessional.