Page 1 of 2

Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:53 pm
by Disoriented
Suspended from parliament for trying to procure cocaine for someone else.

What a wrongun.

Standby for the usual suspects who will cry racism though.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:54 pm
by Proposition Joe
Is this the same scandal as before or a new one?

Why would anyone cry racism? Not sure where your new shtick is heading tbh.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:01 pm
by Bergen
The Standards Committee has published its Report - “Keith Vaz”- today.

Why hasn`t he resigned? This must be SO embarrassing.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:05 pm
by Thor
Vile man I'm glad he's been done the hypocrite. Just need to clear out the other wronguns in the chamber.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:14 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
6 month suspension? FFS.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:15 pm
by Ronnie Hotdogs
Bergen wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:01 pm The Standards Committee has published its Report - “Keith Vaz”- today.

Why hasn`t he resigned? This must be SO embarrassing.
Cant think of a $ingle rea$on why he ha$n't re$igned???

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:16 pm
by spen666
Glad to see a swift speedy conclusion to the investigation

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:18 pm
by Thor
RedO wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:15 pm
Bergen wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:01 pm The Standards Committee has published its Report - “Keith Vaz”- today.

Why hasn`t he resigned? This must be SO embarrassing.
Cant think of a $ingle rea$on why he ha$n't re$igned???
Bang on the Money there redo

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:26 pm
by Fisch
lf he's been trying to buy cocaine, shouldn't there be jail time in the offing?

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:54 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Disoriented wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:53 pm Suspended from parliament for trying to procure cocaine for someone else.

What a wrongun.

Standby for the usual suspects who will cry racism though.
The way their acting in parliament I think some of them must be on crack

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:56 pm
by Disoriented
Proposition Joe wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:54 pm Is this the same scandal as before or a new one?

Why would anyone cry racism? Not sure where your new shtick is heading tbh.
Interesting how you felt personally connected to the comment.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:57 pm
by Disoriented
Thor wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:05 pm Vile man I'm glad he's been done the hypocrite. Just need to clear out the other wronguns in the chamber.
These people have no shame Thora. He should have been kicked out over his previous scandalous behaviour.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:58 pm
by Dunners
I bet he feels a right Charlie.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:58 pm
by Proposition Joe
Disoriented wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:56 pm
Proposition Joe wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:54 pm Is this the same scandal as before or a new one?

Why would anyone cry racism? Not sure where your new shtick is heading tbh.
Interesting how you felt personally connected to the comment.
Did I? I just asked you a question. Interesting how you projected and deflected rather than just answering.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:58 pm
by redintheface
If I recall right, the police “ declined” to prosecute Vaz over these matters in 2016. Shameful.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 4:03 pm
by Disoriented
Proposition Joe wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:58 pm
Disoriented wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:56 pm
Proposition Joe wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:54 pm Is this the same scandal as before or a new one?

Why would anyone cry racism? Not sure where your new shtick is heading tbh.
Interesting how you felt personally connected to the comment.
Did I? I just asked you a question. Interesting how you projected and deflected rather than just answering.
Ignored, rather than projected and deflected TBF. People may attempt to make capital out of it in the same way some infer racism if ‘Rachel’ is criticised. Of course, I can already hear the ‘What’s she got to do with it’ line. Join the dots.

Not sure if your second statement was a question or not, so I will ignore that.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 4:07 pm
by Dunners
"Jim the washing machine salesman" is a great name for a 90s indie band that can't afford a real drummer.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 4:11 pm
by EliotNes
Dunners wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:58 pm I bet he feels a right Charlie.
Like it
:lol:

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 4:11 pm
by Proposition Joe
Disoriented wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 4:03 pm
Proposition Joe wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:58 pm
Disoriented wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:56 pm

Interesting how you felt personally connected to the comment.
Did I? I just asked you a question. Interesting how you projected and deflected rather than just answering.
Ignored, rather than projected and deflected TBF. People may attempt to make capital out of it in the same way some infer racism if ‘Rachel’ is criticised. Of course, I can already hear the ‘What’s she got to do with it’ line. Join the dots.

Not sure if your second statement was a question or not, so I will ignore that.
Shame on the person who seeks to claim racism as a deflection away from Vaz's behaviour. It remains the case that you can criticise people's actions regardless of their skin colour, it's pretty easy. It's just also obvious that there are occasions when some people are influenced by it.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 4:19 pm
by Disoriented
Proposition Joe wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 4:11 pm
Disoriented wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 4:03 pm
Proposition Joe wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 3:58 pm

Did I? I just asked you a question. Interesting how you projected and deflected rather than just answering.
Ignored, rather than projected and deflected TBF. People may attempt to make capital out of it in the same way some infer racism if ‘Rachel’ is criticised. Of course, I can already hear the ‘What’s she got to do with it’ line. Join the dots.

Not sure if your second statement was a question or not, so I will ignore that.
Shame on the person who seeks to claim racism as a deflection away from Vaz's behaviour. It remains the case that you can criticise people's actions regardless of their skin colour, it's pretty easy. It's just also obvious that there are occasions when some people are influenced by it.
I agree entirely. His behaviour is shameless rather than shameful, as he has shown yet again how much of a moral bubble he lives in.

Hopefully the LP do the right thing and expel him. It seems unfathomable that he won’t be given how quickly Alistair Campbell was marched out.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 4:22 pm
by Proposition Joe
If he's not booted out for this it will be a disgrace.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 5:14 pm
by Disoriented
Proposition Joe wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 4:22 pm If he's not booted out for this it will be a disgrace.
Watch this space - he is experiencing mental health issues apparently.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 5:22 pm
by Max B Gold
Disoriented wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 5:14 pm
Proposition Joe wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 4:22 pm If he's not booted out for this it will be a disgrace.
Watch this space - he is experiencing mental health issues apparently.
My understanding is that he has been having treatment for this illness. Get well soon Keef and ignore the ignorant bullies on here.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 5:25 pm
by Proposition Joe
Dodgy or not, if his amnesia is serious enough to impact upon his ability to assist the inquiry then his ability to practise as an MP should also be called into question. Sounds like he may lack capacity.

Re: Keith Vaz

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 5:30 pm
by Disoriented
Comments from the Commons Standards Body:

Vaz was ‘evasive and unhelpful’ and has shown ‘disregard for the law’.

He ‘failed repeatedly to answer direct questions’ and gave accounts which were ‘incredible’.

Enough said - your time’s up Keith.