Page 206 of 212
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2024 11:27 pm
by Proposition Joe
You know the bit where you ended your post with "I think not"? That was you saying what you thought about something. I can see how you have found your own words confusing.
Hope this helps!
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2024 6:17 am
by Hoover Attack
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 11:27 pm
You know the bit where you ended your post with
"I think not"? That was you saying what you thought about something. I can see how you have found your own words confusing.
Hope this helps!
Oh, Peejans!
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2024 7:30 am
by Proposition Joe
What am I missing?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2024 8:15 am
by Long slender neck
Friend or faux wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 9:17 pm
No because I only gave my observations on what other people have told me. These are not my thoughts. That's why I take exception.
You're just posting other people's opinions?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2024 8:59 am
by Friend or faux
At least I am only posting as myself & I haven't got a host of other Boarding names, trolling left right & centre. You LSN seem quite happy with that situation. Over the years that I have posted on this Board it has got sillier and more boring.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2024 9:14 am
by Long slender neck
Forgot you'd only had the one username, Clive.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2024 9:31 am
by Hoover Attack
Oh, peejans! Stop it, right now.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2024 12:15 pm
by Proposition Joe
Ah, it's a bit. Righto.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 7:38 am
by Proposition Joe
Galloway wins Rochdale by-election. He's a real piece of work but can't deny a bit of a LOL.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 7:56 am
by Long slender neck
Islamists have control of him!
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 7:59 am
by Dunners
LOL.
reading the deranged political analysis across the media this morning, I must be in a small minority that thinks this is a non-issue. This as a by-election that become about a single issue. Come the General Election, normal service will be resumed and Rochdale will return to Labour.
But it will be interesting to see what fun and games Galloway gets up to in the intervening months now that he'll have social media platforms to broadcast his oratory skills. Shame he's such a c*nt.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 8:32 am
by Currywurst and Chips
Carpet bagger exploits situation for own gain
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 8:50 am
by Friend or faux
Galloway is a self-serving git and should be treated as a pariah.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 8:52 am
by CEB
I think it’s heartening that the Rochdale voters are so accepting of a man who identifies as a cat
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 9:21 am
by Yanzi Gravy
Friend or faux wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 8:50 am
Galloway is a self-serving git and should be treated as a pariah.
He is I agree but he exposes the flaws of the system by this win. At least he will add a bit of entertainment for a few months.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 9:24 am
by Proposition Joe
Yanzi Gravy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 9:21 am
Friend or faux wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 8:50 am
Galloway is a self-serving git and should be treated as a pariah.
He is I agree but he exposes the flaws of the system by this win. At least he will add a bit of entertainment for a few months.
What flaws has this exposed?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 10:09 am
by slacker
At least that horrible sexpest Danczuk (another ex-Labour MP now standing for Reform) got dicked.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 4:36 pm
by ComeOnYouOs
Interesting to see that a few boarders think Galloway is a ****
To me, this means he must be good, if this message boards contributors think he's a ****
He has his faults, but i was hoping he would win, and for a few months at least, we may have some fun in the HOC
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:19 pm
by CEB
I confidently predict there will be no Galloway inspired fun in the House of Commons.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 10:14 pm
by Yanzi Gravy
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 9:24 am
Yanzi Gravy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 9:21 am
Friend or faux wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 8:50 am
Galloway is a self-serving git and should be treated as a pariah.
He is I agree but he exposes the flaws of the system by this win. At least he will add a bit of entertainment for a few months.
What flaws has this exposed?
He has once again slipped in whilst the main parties are fighting each other and he has taken advantage of the turmoil to gain the votes from Labour. There must be something wrong in a system where Labour could not replaced their original candidate even at the last moment. What would happen if the candidate got run over by a double decker for instance? Why should Labour supporters not have a candidate?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2024 12:36 am
by Proposition Joe
How did Galloway expose that flaw? He had nothing to do with the Labour candidate getting binned.
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2024 12:43 am
by Hoover Attack
Yanzi Gravy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 10:14 pm
What would happen if the candidate got run over by a double decker for instance?
A Workers Party landslide, the pleasure, the privilege is mine etc
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2024 1:40 am
by E10EU
Must say: I am quite amused by this result.
Starmer cancelled the LP candidate at short notice because the formerly Starmer-approved candidate (not a leftie or Corbyn supporter) because he voiced somewhere questions about how and why the October massacre started, questioning why the sophistocated Israeli army had seemingly 'been unaware and unprepared'. Starmer's position has always been that Israel is 'the victim' and therefore entitled to withhold food and water ... and it seems that now any LP candidate has to adopt and support Starmer's wholehearted support of the Israeli government. Maybe Starmer needs to consider that the country at large does not quite see it that way?
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2024 9:52 am
by Currywurst and Chips
E10EU wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2024 1:40 am
Must say: I am quite amused by this result.
Starmer cancelled the LP candidate at short notice because the formerly Starmer-approved candidate (not a leftie or Corbyn supporter) because he voiced somewhere questions about how and why the October massacre started, questioning why the sophistocated Israeli army had seemingly 'been unaware and unprepared'. Starmer's position has always been that Israel is 'the victim' and therefore entitled to withhold food and water ... and it seems that now any LP candidate has to adopt and support Starmer's wholehearted support of the Israeli government. Maybe Starmer needs to consider that the country at large does not quite see it that way?
He stood by him when he voiced conspiracy theories about the massacre, he dropped him when he spread racist conspiracy theories about Jews running the media
Idiot
Re: Labour Watch
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2024 11:21 am
by Yanzi Gravy
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2024 12:43 am
Yanzi Gravy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 10:14 pm
What would happen if the candidate got run over by a double decker for instance?
A Workers Party landslide, the pleasure, the privilege is mine etc
Still seems like there is no contingency for a candidate withdrawing at the last minute.