The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
Please read my tweet . I did not say that those names would be better. Looking at my Twitter pages there are around 7 out of 10 negative comments. I follow over 1000 others most O's related. You do know Liverani is managing in Serie A having achieved 2 promtions with Lecce?Red_Army wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:39 pm Firstly there has been no appointment as of yet. Secondly you have no way of knowing that number. Thirdly even if you are correct that most are against it, they have no reason to be at this stage before a ball has even been kicked. Fourth, I'm pretty sure unless you are braindead you would prefer an appointment like this to Cavasin or Liverani.
I've read your post, no idea about your tweet.aylesburyos wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:46 pmPlease read my tweet . I did not say that those names would be better. Looking at my Twitter pages there are around 7 out of 10 negative comments. I follow over 1000 others most O's related. You do know Liverani is managing in Serie A having achieved 2 promtions with Lecce?Red_Army wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:39 pm Firstly there has been no appointment as of yet. Secondly you have no way of knowing that number. Thirdly even if you are correct that most are against it, they have no reason to be at this stage before a ball has even been kicked. Fourth, I'm pretty sure unless you are braindead you would prefer an appointment like this to Cavasin or Liverani.
The two problems with the Liverani appointment were the bloke who employed him and the fact he didn't speak English.eagwgw wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:50 pm Doesn't mean we should get Liverani in though, his problem here was that most of the squad did not accept him, and he did not have the time to change the players.
Anyway in my view it's quite a minority who would be saying it is a bad appointment.
The middle ground is people that are saying it isn't what they thought it would be, but they will back the board and the manager if it happens.
The other extreme are those who probably share the same view of the middle ground but don't have the balls to admit it, and back the board while accusing everyone else of a 'meltdown'.
As Kevin Bloody Wilson would say "What an absolute c**t of a post"aylesburyos wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:32 pm Looking on Twitter & here I reckon 70% of fans are not happy. Can't even remeber the likes of Cavasin & Liverani being this unpopular. Hopefully the owners have seen sense. Get Adams, Sol C Holloway or Parkinson instead
But but but aylesburyos definitely isn't a moaning old whingebag based on past form and has said that 70% of people think it's a poor appointment based on his expert analysis skills and unbiased reporting of the facts that's not to an agenda. You must be mistaken.Story of O wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:10 am Having looked on social media it seems the majority are prepared to give Fletcher a chance.
And so they should. This is a professional person, Eddie Howe speaks highly of him, ML and our board have done their homework and we should be embracing the appointment and not slaughtering him before he’s even managed a coaching session with his team. Without his identity and philosophy imposed on the team and without any results to see the work put in on the training pitch show through in games, don’t forget it will take time for what he wants to show through, just like it did for Justin with inconsistency at the beginning of his time in charge and look at how brilliant he turned out to be.Story of O wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:10 am Having looked on social media it seems the majority are prepared to give Fletcher a chance.
I think your memory of the reaction to Cavasin's appointment is faulty - if the Twitter comments at the time are anything to go by.aylesburyos wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:32 pm Can't even remeber the likes of Cavasin & Liverani being this unpopular.
Recency bias.A Pedant wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:14 amI think your memory of the reaction to Cavasin's appointment is faulty - if the Twitter comments at the time are anything to go by.aylesburyos wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:32 pm Can't even remeber the likes of Cavasin & Liverani being this unpopular.
Liverani though?A Pedant wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:14 amI think your memory of the reaction to Cavasin's appointment is faulty - if the Twitter comments at the time are anything to go by.aylesburyos wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:32 pm Can't even remeber the likes of Cavasin & Liverani being this unpopular.
Get Bowers in, prontoO my gawd wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:58 amAs Kevin Bloody Wilson would say "What an absolute c**t of a post"aylesburyos wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:32 pm Looking on Twitter & here I reckon 70% of fans are not happy. Can't even remeber the likes of Cavasin & Liverani being this unpopular. Hopefully the owners have seen sense. Get Adams, Sol C Holloway or Parkinson instead
Pure poison & lacking in any kind of knowledge & trust for our board, who quite simply have been phenomenal since saving us.
I love the smell of robust methodology in the morningSmendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:38 pm Mot likely because of a) confirmation bias and b) recency bias
Also, your estimate of 70% of people on Twitter - what's the base size on that? And how does that compare to the overall fan base?
I absolutely agree with the sentiments of Thor's post.Thor wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:11 amAnd so they should. This is a professional person, Eddie Howe speaks highly of him, ML and our board have done their homework and we should be embracing the appointment and not slaughtering him before he’s even managed a coaching session with his team. Without his identity and philosophy imposed on the team and without any results to see the work put in on the training pitch show through in games, don’t forget it will take time for what he wants to show through, just like it did for Justin with inconsistency at the beginning of his time in charge and look at how brilliant he turned out to be.Story of O wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:10 am Having looked on social media it seems the majority are prepared to give Fletcher a chance.
Sometimes I wonder about people who follow us.
It's no more scientific than the OP, but the Argyle fans I've seen online have been very complimentary with some calling him a legend ect.VeganO wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 10:45 amI absolutely agree with the sentiments of Thor's post.Thor wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:11 amAnd so they should. This is a professional person, Eddie Howe speaks highly of him, ML and our board have done their homework and we should be embracing the appointment and not slaughtering him before he’s even managed a coaching session with his team. Without his identity and philosophy imposed on the team and without any results to see the work put in on the training pitch show through in games, don’t forget it will take time for what he wants to show through, just like it did for Justin with inconsistency at the beginning of his time in charge and look at how brilliant he turned out to be.Story of O wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:10 am Having looked on social media it seems the majority are prepared to give Fletcher a chance.
Sometimes I wonder about people who follow us.
It has to be said that it is a risky appointment but many managerial appointments are. You never know how it will go. I trust the Board's judgment & the judgment of people like Eddie Howe.
I note from another thread that Carl did very well initially at Argyle & then things turned sour. Apparently fans were delighted when he was sacked. The same could be said about Man Utd fans when Mourinho was sacked.
Clearly he needs to be given a chance & we need to back him. He has made a good start by saying to ML that he wants it made clear to Justin's family that they are always welcome at the club. Hopefully this will be appreciated by players & other staff.
Less vitriolic a reception than for Cavasin, but not exactly a warm welcome either (and of course, it was still early in Beelzebub's reign of terror so there were still a fair amount of people misty-eyed that we'd spent money on transfer fees):aylesburyos wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 10:17 amLiverani though?A Pedant wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:14 amI think your memory of the reaction to Cavasin's appointment is faulty - if the Twitter comments at the time are anything to go by.aylesburyos wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:32 pm Can't even remeber the likes of Cavasin & Liverani being this unpopular.