Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:37 pm
Independent Leyton Orient Forum
The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
Good Reference.
Page 1 of 1
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:50 pm
Interestingly when you read wiki he gets a reference quote different from this.
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:53 pm
The quote that stands out “ Not up to the job of football manager .”
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:56 pm
Jesus wept. This sounds like Davis all over again. The Crewe fans were spot on in their analysis on him.
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:58 pm
Yet according to wiki he managed to guide a troubled team to,safety and his contribution to the club will be remembered for a long time.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:53 pm The quote that stands out “ Not up to the job of football manager .”
Reading fans opinions are a dangerous thing. Just someone’s view, don’t make it right, don’t make it wrong. And if people at the club don’t know all this stuff when coming to a decision I would be amazed.
People read what they want to read in this stuff. If he is appointed I just hope he does well.
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:00 pm
Was he working under a director of football at that time, could make a big difference?
Mikero
Mikero
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:02 pm
We all wait with baited breath.
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:04 pm
Disoriented wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:56 pm Jesus wept. This sounds like Davis all over again. The Crewe fans were spot on in their analysis on him.
Talk about not learning from your mistakes
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:07 pm
Bywaters with another of his all things negative posts trying to stir it up again. Might hold some credibility if he went to games and hadn't already been kicked off the previous reincarnation of this board for being an obnoxious tool nothing has changed.
I would rather give Fletcher a chance to show us what he can do than castigate him on that article, read Wikipedia and you get a different story, I trust Travis and Teague to make a decent appointment.
I would rather give Fletcher a chance to show us what he can do than castigate him on that article, read Wikipedia and you get a different story, I trust Travis and Teague to make a decent appointment.
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:07 pm
dOh Nut wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:58 pmYet according to wiki he managed to guide a troubled team to,safety and his contribution to the club will be remembered for a long time.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:53 pm The quote that stands out “ Not up to the job of football manager .”
Reading fans opinions are a dangerous thing. Just someone’s view, don’t make it right, don’t make it wrong. And if people at the club don’t know all this stuff when coming to a decision I would be amazed.
People read what they want to read in this stuff. If he is appointed I just hope he does well.
If he gets the gig, Nutty we’re obliged to hope he does well
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:21 pm
If he’s so good, why hasn’t he managed for six years?
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:26 pm
Exactly
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:28 pm
Attention to detail is obviously not your strength.Top of the West. wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:07 pm Bywaters with another of his all things negative posts trying to stir it up again. Might hold some credibility if he went to games and hadn't already been kicked off the previous reincarnation of this board for being an obnoxious tool nothing has changed.
I would rather give Fletcher a chance to show us what he can do than castigate him on that article, read Wikipedia and you get a different story, I trust Travis and Teague to make a decent appointment.
The name is BYWAYS.
That’s right you waste your money and time giving a bloke a chance who should be nowhere near the job.
He has not been linked with any other club since his appalling spell at Plymouth and you just tug your forelock and hope this turns out for the best.
I find it hard to believe he was the first choice, it looks like we were turned down by quite a few.
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:33 pm
Details, details. There’s me thinking it was byways1. But if you say there is no 1 at the end I’d better go to spec-savers. No, I’m sure there is a 1 at the end. Don’t know your own name. Says it all really. As you say, details.Byways1 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:28 pmAttention to detail is obviously not your strength.Top of the West. wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:07 pm Bywaters with another of his all things negative posts trying to stir it up again. Might hold some credibility if he went to games and hadn't already been kicked off the previous reincarnation of this board for being an obnoxious tool nothing has changed.
I would rather give Fletcher a chance to show us what he can do than castigate him on that article, read Wikipedia and you get a different story, I trust Travis and Teague to make a decent appointment.
The name is BYWAYS.
That’s right you waste your money and time giving a bloke a chance who should be nowhere near the job.
He has not been linked with any other club since his appalling spell at Plymouth and you just tug your forelock and hope this turns out for the best.
I find it hard to believe he was the first choice, it looks like we were turned down by quite a few.
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:35 pm
I think I know your name.dOh Nut wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:33 pmDetails, details. There’s me thinking it was byways1. But if you say there is no 1 at the end I’d better go to spec-savers. No, I’m sure there is a 1 at the end. Don’t know your own name. Says it all really. As you say, details.Byways1 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:28 pmAttention to detail is obviously not your strength.Top of the West. wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:07 pm Bywaters with another of his all things negative posts trying to stir it up again. Might hold some credibility if he went to games and hadn't already been kicked off the previous reincarnation of this board for being an obnoxious tool nothing has changed.
I would rather give Fletcher a chance to show us what he can do than castigate him on that article, read Wikipedia and you get a different story, I trust Travis and Teague to make a decent appointment.
The name is BYWAYS.
That’s right you waste your money and time giving a bloke a chance who should be nowhere near the job.
He has not been linked with any other club since his appalling spell at Plymouth and you just tug your forelock and hope this turns out for the best.
I find it hard to believe he was the first choice, it looks like we were turned down by quite a few.
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:35 pm
If some managers are so good why do they get sacked?
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:40 pm
This bloke was so bad that he hasn’t been mentioned in regard to any managers job for 6 years.dOh Nut wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:35 pmIf some managers are so good why do they get sacked?
Makes me wonder why ling didn’t appoint him before, is he better qualified now than two years ago?
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:53 pm
You should have stuck to "I admit it I was wrong." Ironically changing to that username was the only statement you ever got right. It was all anti Orient vitriol and telling everyone the club was finished on the old board until you got torn a new one about the ownership. Just call it a day and feck off to MK Dons. BTW where were you last season when we were doing well?Byways1 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:28 pmAttention to detail is obviously not your strength.Top of the West. wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:07 pm Bywaters with another of his all things negative posts trying to stir it up again. Might hold some credibility if he went to games and hadn't already been kicked off the previous reincarnation of this board for being an obnoxious tool nothing has changed.
I would rather give Fletcher a chance to show us what he can do than castigate him on that article, read Wikipedia and you get a different story, I trust Travis and Teague to make a decent appointment.
The name is BYWAYS.
That’s right you waste your money and time giving a bloke a chance who should be nowhere near the job.
He has not been linked with any other club since his appalling spell at Plymouth and you just tug your forelock and hope this turns out for the best.
I find it hard to believe he was the first choice, it looks like we were turned down by quite a few.
Re: Good Reference.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:57 pm
I didn’t change the user name you naive idiot.Top of the West. wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:53 pmYou should have stuck to "I admit it I was wrong." Ironically changing to that username was the only statement you ever got right. It was all anti Orient vitriol and telling everyone the club was finished on the old board until you got torn a new one about the ownership. Just call it a day and feck off to MK Dons. BTW where were you last season when we were doing well?Byways1 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:28 pmAttention to detail is obviously not your strength.Top of the West. wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:07 pm Bywaters with another of his all things negative posts trying to stir it up again. Might hold some credibility if he went to games and hadn't already been kicked off the previous reincarnation of this board for being an obnoxious tool nothing has changed.
I would rather give Fletcher a chance to show us what he can do than castigate him on that article, read Wikipedia and you get a different story, I trust Travis and Teague to make a decent appointment.
The name is BYWAYS.
That’s right you waste your money and time giving a bloke a chance who should be nowhere near the job.
He has not been linked with any other club since his appalling spell at Plymouth and you just tug your forelock and hope this turns out for the best.
I find it hard to believe he was the first choice, it looks like we were turned down by quite a few.