Independent Leyton Orient Forum

The French have widened the liability of employers for their employees health

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... rules.html

Oh good, you’re back.

Who are you defending this time?

You’ve already stuck up for nonces and racists.

Mugabe just popped his cloggs. Have you come here to defend his good name?

I cannot see how any French company can now send people away, in case something happens.

The logic defies belief.

No way we’re getting through today without one or both of Spen and Est”yyy getting banned.

Nah, this has been slow burning for a while, it won't be today.

Is P&O Esty? FFS.

Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:09 am Is P&O Esty? FFS.

What you didn’t know with your excellent ahem moderator skills

He keeps using different emails and is masking his IP so not sure what else we can do. That, and I'm a Luddite.

Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:39 am He keeps using different emails and is masking his IP so not sure what else we can do. That, and I'm a Luddite.

You destroy machinery in wool and cotton mills what a weird occupation to have in this modern age

Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:39 am He keeps using different emails and is masking his IP so not sure what else we can do. That, and I'm a Luddite.

Why is that cock spen allowed back but este isn't?

RedO wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:58 am

Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:39 am He keeps using different emails and is masking his IP so not sure what else we can do. That, and I'm a Luddite.

Why is that cock spen allowed back but este isn't?

P&O is Esteban stop panicking please

he is worryingly persistent. Perhaps you could appoint another moderator to ease the load?

Surely masking an IP address is grounds for a ban?

If not, could you post a tutorial on how to do it please? It will make it much easier to maintain all my aliases.

What is the purpose of this thread?

Disoriented wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 7:04 pm What is the purpose of this thread?

I suspect that Spen is trying to spark a debate in which he'll be able to strut his funky imaginary legal credentials.

He pretends to be 'a lawyer' and seeks to inject legal discussions into almost everything that he posts.

He's not a lawyer; he's a fantasist who craves attention.

Fatbaz wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 7:40 pm

Disoriented wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 7:04 pm What is the purpose of this thread?

I suspect that Spen is trying to spark a debate in which he'll be able to strut his funky imaginary legal credentials.

He pretends to be 'a lawyer' and seeks to inject legal discussions into almost everything that he posts.

He's not a lawyer; he's a fantasist who craves attention.

Spot on.

Sad really.

Shame this thread has focused on a boarder. The decision in France I find quite astonishing and one that may have repercussions for business travelers. Oh well. It started well.

P&O wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 8:34 am Oh good, you’re back.

Who are you defending this time?

You’ve already stuck up for nonces and racists.

Mugabe just popped his cloggs. Have you come here to defend his good name?

Hello Esteban,

It's been a while

Disoriented wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 8:09 pm

Fatbaz wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 7:40 pm

Disoriented wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 7:04 pm What is the purpose of this thread?

I suspect that Spen is trying to spark a debate in which he'll be able to strut his funky imaginary legal credentials.

He pretends to be 'a lawyer' and seeks to inject legal discussions into almost everything that he posts.

He's not a lawyer; he's a fantasist who craves attention.

Spot on.

Sad really.

Better tell the Law Society that as they have had me on the register of lawyers for 4 decades now.and thanks for paying me my salary as a lawyer from your taxes

What register are you on, spen?

RedO wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:16 pm What register are you on, spen?

This one
https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/using- ... -solicitor

And this one


https://find.icaew.com/


For starters

Spen,

simply 'saying' that you are on a list doesn't prove that you are.

How about this:

You send me a private message stating your name. I will then use my own sources to check the veracity of your claim. You may be assured of complete confidentiality. I won't disclose your real name to anybody. If I find that you are a lawyer, I'll post on here confirming your claim and I'll offer a full apology for doubting you.

Fatbaz wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:23 am Spen,

simply 'saying' that you are on a list doesn't prove that you are.

How about this:

You send me a private message stating your name. I will then use my own sources to check the veracity of your claim. You may be assured of complete confidentiality. I won't disclose your real name to anybody. If I find that you are a lawyer, I'll post on here confirming your claim and I'll offer a full apology for doubting you.

If you are so keen then go find the information. It's not hard to find my name. It's all over social media.

Esteban quite happily posted my name on here.

Oh & it is a criminal offence to claim to be a solicitor, so to report me to the police

I see.

You won't tell me your name. Therefore you cannot support your claim to be 'a lawyer'. It's only hot air. You are a faker.

And, yes, as a matter of fact, it is a criminal offence to claim to be a lawyer if you are not.

The Solicitors Act, 1974, Section 21: 'Any unqualified person who willfully pretends to be, or takes or uses any name, title, addition or description implying that, he is qualified or recognised by law as qualified to act as a solicitor shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to [F1 a fine not exceeding the fourth level on the standard scale.]'

You would know this if you were a lawyer. You don't know it because you're not.

Thats what he said Esteban.