The Unofficial and Independent Leyton Orient Message Board
https://lofcforum.com/forum1/phpBB3/
Beckles was given the assistMax B Gold wrote: ↑Sat May 10, 2025 7:04 pm Judging from Kelmans offside goal I suspect the EFL have really got it in for Stockport.
Dies Kelmans goal count toward his seasons total given that it was illegal.
That referee was poo poo all round - that goal was miles offside considering Beckles got his head to it, but the first penalty shout was a clear penalty when Kelman went down just inside the boxMax B Gold wrote: ↑Sat May 10, 2025 7:04 pm Judging from Kelmans offside goal I suspect the EFL have really got it in for Stockport.
Dies Kelmans goal count toward his seasons total given that it was illegal.
I read that too, that definitely needs a "what were you thinking" explanation from the referee as I can't see how you could award the goal knowing Beckles touched it. Not complaining mind but very bizarreHoover Attack wrote: ↑Sat May 10, 2025 8:15 pm I’ve heard that the officials have said they knew Beckles touched it, which doesn’t make any sense at all.
Abysmal biased reporting. No wonder no-one wants to put their name to it. Liquidate.Rich Tea Wellin wrote: ↑Sat May 10, 2025 4:44 pm Unless the linesman had his mobile off last night when the efl tried to call him about making sure orient fail at every opportunity?
https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... tch-report
Barnsley's goal was onside, it was a good decision.North Stand Dave wrote: ↑Sat May 10, 2025 10:25 pm MaxBGold, shut up you Muppet
Refferes & linos make loads of mistakes.
If that's the case will Barnsleys second goal against us was well offside aswell, will that be chalked off.
These officials are on good money per game.
It's embarrassing the mistakes some make
Disagree, Beckles & his opposite had been mma at every corner, Charlie was a blatant trip in the box.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Sat May 10, 2025 8:05 pm The Beckles grapple on their forward felt more of a pen to me - as HV said, the forward pushes down on Reg and so should have been a foul, but it's a 50/50.
I can see how the Kelman first goal was given, even if it's an awful decision. Wasn't massively clear in real time whether Beckles touched it on the way and if he doesn't, then it's not offside.
I have watched our first goal multiple times and I cant see that Beckles touched it. Therefore Kelman was onside from the Clare headerDelightInE10 wrote: ↑Sat May 10, 2025 7:45 pmThat referee was poo poo all round - that goal was miles offside considering Beckles got his head to it, but the first penalty shout was a clear penalty when Kelman went down just inside the boxMax B Gold wrote: ↑Sat May 10, 2025 7:04 pm Judging from Kelmans offside goal I suspect the EFL have really got it in for Stockport.
Dies Kelmans goal count toward his seasons total given that it was illegal.
When the ball was headed forward charlie was onside,only question is did it touch buckles head,so not as clear cut as it seems when charlie received ball as he had run forwardDuvB wrote: ↑Sun May 11, 2025 9:10 amI have watched our first goal multiple times and I cant see that Beckles touched it. Therefore Kelman was onside from the Clare headerDelightInE10 wrote: ↑Sat May 10, 2025 7:45 pmThat referee was poo poo all round - that goal was miles offside considering Beckles got his head to it, but the first penalty shout was a clear penalty when Kelman went down just inside the boxMax B Gold wrote: ↑Sat May 10, 2025 7:04 pm Judging from Kelmans offside goal I suspect the EFL have really got it in for Stockport.
Dies Kelmans goal count toward his seasons total given that it was illegal.