Independent Leyton Orient Forum

‘I did not suspect Epstein’s behaviour.’



Good to see the Duke ‘clarifying facts’.

Nah he was to busy shagging the thousand plus woman hes allegedly had

Buckingham Palace are getting mighty desperate, thats for sure

Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:57 pm ‘I did not suspect Epstein’s behaviour.’



Good to see the Duke ‘clarifying facts’.

Convenient. Me thinks this is going to linger.

Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:57 pm ‘I did not suspect Epstein’s behaviour.’



Good to see the Duke ‘clarifying facts’.

He didn't need to suspect anything because he still hung around with him after he was convicted of sex crimes.

“A man is known by the company he keeps”

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 11:45 pm

Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:57 pm ‘I did not suspect Epstein’s behaviour.’



Good to see the Duke ‘clarifying facts’.

He didn't need to suspect anything because he still hung around with him after he was convicted of sex crimes.

“A man is known by the company he keeps”

Spot on . Prince Andrew is a creep.

BIGRON wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 10:01 pm Nah he was to busy shagging the thousand plus woman hes allegedly had

Nearly as many as you Big Ron!

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 11:45 pm

Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:57 pm ‘I did not suspect Epstein’s behaviour.’



Good to see the Duke ‘clarifying facts’.

He didn't need to suspect anything because he still hung around with him after he was convicted of sex crimes.

“A man is known by the company he keeps”

Exactly. I hung out with a prominent *convicted* sex offender but had no idea of the kind of behaviour he got up to.

Also, that statement refers to Epstein's lifestyle. He wasn't having affairs or going dogging, he was a f*cking trafficker of underage girls. That's not a 'lifestyle choice'. Get the f*** out.

Lovejoy wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 12:05 am

BIGRON wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 10:01 pm Nah he was to busy shagging the thousand plus woman hes allegedly had

Nearly as many as you Big Ron!

I wished , i can acctually count the women ive done the deed with

I'm sure there'll be a robust and entirely impartial investigation into HRH's association with a known child rapist and trafficker. Yup. Yup.Yup.

Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 1:38 pm I'm sure there'll be a robust and entirely impartial investigation into HRH's association with a known child rapist and trafficker. Yup. Yup.Yup.

Epstein has as many convictions for clid rape as you or i

spen666 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 2:03 pm

Eat The Rich wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 1:38 pm I'm sure there'll be a robust and entirely impartial investigation into HRH's association with a known child rapist and trafficker. Yup. Yup.Yup.

Epstein has as many convictions for clid rape as you or i

What do you call it when someone has sex with a person unable to give consent?

Spen69 The Paedo's Advocate.

West Side Story wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 2:14 pm Spen69 The Paedo's Advocate.

I'm not advocating anything other than the truth.

Sorry if facts and truth offend you

Andrew will weather the storm as people of his status almost always do. In another few days, weeks at most, this will all be old news. The media will have moved on. Unless some hard evidence of his taking part in under age sex comes to light he's in the clear. Even if it does emerge he can probably just buy his way out of it.

At the very least, his judgement is obviously terrible, at worst it's certainly not unreasonable to question Andrews motives in continuing his association with a convicted paedophile and trafficker of under age girls. We can all come to our own conclusions why Andrew chose to continue his association with scum like Epstein.

Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 11:45 pm

Disoriented wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:57 pm ‘I did not suspect Epstein’s behaviour.’



Good to see the Duke ‘clarifying facts’.

He didn't need to suspect anything because he still hung around with him after he was convicted of sex crimes.

“A man is known by the company he keeps”

Sort of destroys Andy’s defence don’t it. His not knowing stuff is just plain stupid. Course he fecking did. What he didn’t know was the the whole sordid story would come out.

Sorry Spen69, I did you a mis-justice. Should read The Rich & Powerful Paedo's Advocate.

West Side Story wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 6:45 pm Sorry Spen69, I did you a mis-justice. Should read The Rich & Powerful Paedo's Advocate.

Amazing how stupid you can be without trying.

I have not advocated anything other than stating a fact

Can he play in midfield.

Andersonitis wrote: ↑Mon Aug 26, 2019 2:25 pm Can he play in midfield.

no he plays up front.

Roll on the Revolution and he'll be one of the first up against the wall.

spen666 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 10:15 pm

West Side Story wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 6:45 pm Sorry Spen69, I did you a mis-justice. Should read The Rich & Powerful Paedo's Advocate.

Amazing how stupid you can be without trying.

I have not advocated anything other than stating a fact

Yes. One fact. There may very well be other facts. Just because we are not yet aware of them doesn't mean they don't exist. If I were you I would shut up about this until all the facts are available.

StockholmO wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2019 1:12 am Roll on the Revolution and he'll be one of the first up against the wall.

Bit harsh on Spen but then again.......

EH16 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2019 12:10 pm

spen666 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 10:15 pm

West Side Story wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 6:45 pm Sorry Spen69, I did you a mis-justice. Should read The Rich & Powerful Paedo's Advocate.

Amazing how stupid you can be without trying.

I have not advocated anything other than stating a fact

Yes. One fact. There may very well be other facts. Just because we are not yet aware of them doesn't mean they don't exist. If I were you I would shut up about this until all the facts are available.

Calm down.....


I started that Epstein had been convicted of as many rapes as you or I.

I started nothing more than that. I didn't say he had not had not raped anyone.

The fact is that unless you have a rape conviction, then Epstein has been convicted of as many rapes as you and me.

Stop trying to twist that into my defending or otherwise Epstein.

I am neither defending nor accusing him of anything as I have the sense to know I am not in possession of all the relevant evidence

spen666 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2019 12:50 pm

EH16 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2019 12:10 pm

spen666 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 10:15 pm

Amazing how stupid you can be without trying.

I have not advocated anything other than stating a fact

Yes. One fact. There may very well be other facts. Just because we are not yet aware of them doesn't mean they don't exist. If I were you I would shut up about this until all the facts are available.

Calm down.....


I started that Epstein had been convicted of as many rapes as you or I.

I started nothing more than that. I didn't say he had not had not raped anyone.

The fact is that unless you have a rape conviction, then Epstein has been convicted of as many rapes as you and me.

Stop trying to twist that into my defending or otherwise Epstein.

I am neither defending nor accusing him of anything as I have the sense to know I am not in possession of all the relevant evidence

Yes, yes but by taking that tack you are deflecting away from the sex crimes he was convicted of. That is an old trick often used by those in the legal profession to protect and stand up for their client. Tell us more about his convictions instead.