Page 1 of 2

Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 7:48 pm
by EliotNes
Enjoy

https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/1 ... highlights

10 min version further down the thread.

Re: Sky TV Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 8:16 pm
by Hoover Attack
How was that foul on Cooper for their 2nd not given?

Was a blatant foul on Cooper before the throw in for the first, too.

Re: Sky TV Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 8:17 pm
by The Reverend
Gotta love Brown and Kelman giving the away end some sh*t after that last minute winner. 😂

Re: Sky TV Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 8:39 pm
by Hoover Attack
Should have celebrated in front of that c*nt Collins, not their fans.

Re: Sky TV Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 9:05 pm
by Stowaway
f*cking hell, what was Keeley doing for their second? 😡

Re: Sky TV Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 9:25 pm
by KingLes
I love keeley he’s been Brilliant for us but that’s a real clanger for their second. !

Re: Sky TV Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 12:16 am
by EliotNes

Re: Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 1:12 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
Didn’t realise Ethan for a hattrick of assists today. 4 assists and a goal in a week.

The ‘foul’ for their free kick that led to their second was one of the softest I’ve seen in a while.

Simpsons gotta look at himself for both goals imo. First one he’s caught flat footed and the attacker gets in front of him and the second one he appears to be daydreaming as the ball comes across and he’s marking fresh air

Re: Sky TV Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 6:18 am
by Mickys Bullock
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2025 8:16 pm How was that foul on Cooper for their 2nd not given?

Was a blatant foul on Cooper before the throw in for the first, too.
Foul was of no consequence as it was a yard offside beforehand as Richie alluded to in his interview.

Re: Sky TV Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:02 am
by Hoover Attack
Mickys Bullock wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2025 6:18 am
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2025 8:16 pm How was that foul on Cooper for their 2nd not given?

Was a blatant foul on Cooper before the throw in for the first, too.
Foul was of no consequence as it was a yard offside beforehand as Richie alluded to in his interview.
I saw the linesman dithering as if he was about to flag but no idea if it was off or not from my vantage point.

Re: Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 1:46 pm
by Johnolbe
From the hi lights your first looks a questionable off side shout and the free kick is harsh for what looks a good hard challenge. Our first re offside shout leading to the throw in, Hackett was offside but he didn’t play the ball so classed as not interfering.
Strange that both our first half offside goals aren’t in any extended hi lights I’ve seen. Not saying they weren’t correct but haven’t seen them replayed.
We are all rose tinted in favour of our team to be fair

Re: Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 2:10 pm
by Hoover Attack
Johnolbe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2025 1:46 pm From the hi lights your first looks a questionable off side shout and the free kick is harsh for what looks a good hard challenge. Our first re offside shout leading to the throw in, Hackett was offside but he didn’t play the ball so classed as not interfering.
Strange that both our first half offside goals aren’t in any extended hi lights I’ve seen. Not saying they weren’t correct but haven’t seen them replayed.
We are all rose tinted in favour of our team to be fair
Impossible to call from that angle whether Perkins was offside for our first. I didn’t think so in real time but have heard your manager bitching about it.

The free kick for our first was no more questionable than the ‘foul’ by Galbraith on your 18 for the free kick from which you scored your second. I thought both were fouls.

Think it’s pretty normal to leave out disallowed goals in the highlights, not some big conspiracy.

And the holding on Cooper for your second should have been given. To be fair, the ref was letting your guys get away with all sorts in aerial challenges so I shouldn’t be surprised.

Re: Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 2:33 pm
by Captain Zep
I thought the Lincoln lad had timed his run perfectly but I was behind the goal so I was hoping to have another look. There didn't seem to be much protest from them so perhaps it was the right call.

Re: Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 3:28 pm
by Johnolbe
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2025 2:10 pm
Johnolbe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2025 1:46 pm From the hi lights your first looks a questionable off side shout and the free kick is harsh for what looks a good hard challenge. Our first re offside shout leading to the throw in, Hackett was offside but he didn’t play the ball so classed as not interfering.
Strange that both our first half offside goals aren’t in any extended hi lights I’ve seen. Not saying they weren’t correct but haven’t seen them replayed.
We are all rose tinted in favour of our team to be fair
Impossible to call from that angle whether Perkins was offside for our first. I didn’t think so in real time but have heard your manager bitching about it.

The free kick for our first was no more questionable than the ‘foul’ by Galbraith on your 18 for the free kick from which you scored your second. I thought both were fouls.

Think it’s pretty normal to leave out disallowed goals in the highlights, not some big conspiracy.

And the holding on Cooper for your second should have been given. To be fair, the ref was letting your guys get away with all sorts in aerial challenges so I shouldn’t be surprised.
I said I haven’t seen any replays of the offside goals which is surely a fair comment, who mentioned a conspiracy? Such events usually crop up somewhere on social media or the hi lights to get a second look as it’s hellish hard to make a close call live at a game.

Re: Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 3:36 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
Johnolbe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2025 1:46 pm From the hi lights your first looks a questionable off side shout and the free kick is harsh for what looks a good hard challenge. Our first re offside shout leading to the throw in, Hackett was offside but he didn’t play the ball so classed as not interfering.
Strange that both our first half offside goals aren’t in any extended hi lights I’ve seen. Not saying they weren’t correct but haven’t seen them replayed.
We are all rose tinted in favour of our team to be fair
Are we seriously questioning if it was a foul when currie got taken down by the throat? In var land that’s verging on a red card

Re: Sky TV Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 4:10 pm
by LeighO
The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2025 8:17 pm Gotta love Brown and Kelman giving the away end some sh*t after that last minute winner. 😂
Don’t tell Henry Hoover Attachment, he doesn’t approve of players giving it.’

Re: Sky TV Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 5:25 pm
by Hoover Attack
LeighO wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2025 4:10 pm
The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2025 8:17 pm Gotta love Brown and Kelman giving the away end some sh*t after that last minute winner. 😂
Don’t tell Henry Hoover Attachment, he doesn’t approve of players giving it.’
Did seem a bit odd. Had Kelman been getting any stick from their end?

Re: Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 5:26 pm
by Hoover Attack
Johnolbe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2025 3:28 pm
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2025 2:10 pm
Johnolbe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2025 1:46 pm From the hi lights your first looks a questionable off side shout and the free kick is harsh for what looks a good hard challenge. Our first re offside shout leading to the throw in, Hackett was offside but he didn’t play the ball so classed as not interfering.
Strange that both our first half offside goals aren’t in any extended hi lights I’ve seen. Not saying they weren’t correct but haven’t seen them replayed.
We are all rose tinted in favour of our team to be fair
Impossible to call from that angle whether Perkins was offside for our first. I didn’t think so in real time but have heard your manager bitching about it.

The free kick for our first was no more questionable than the ‘foul’ by Galbraith on your 18 for the free kick from which you scored your second. I thought both were fouls.

Think it’s pretty normal to leave out disallowed goals in the highlights, not some big conspiracy.

And the holding on Cooper for your second should have been given. To be fair, the ref was letting your guys get away with all sorts in aerial challenges so I shouldn’t be surprised.
I said I haven’t seen any replays of the offside goals which is surely a fair comment, who mentioned a conspiracy? Such events usually crop up somewhere on social media or the hi lights to get a second look as it’s hellish hard to make a close call live at a game.
Can’t ever remember disallowed goals being includded in the highlights? Happy to be proved wrong.

Re: Sky TV Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:02 pm
by Proposition Joe
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2025 5:25 pm
LeighO wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2025 4:10 pm
The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2025 8:17 pm Gotta love Brown and Kelman giving the away end some sh*t after that last minute winner. 😂
Don’t tell Henry Hoover Attachment, he doesn’t approve of players giving it.’
Did seem a bit odd. Had Kelman been getting any stick from their end?
Just 'a bit odd', not the actions of a c*nt?

Re: Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 9:29 pm
by Hoover Attack
As far as I’m aware, no Lincoln fans died in that section of the ground, so he was unlikely to have been giving it to the friends/family of the deceased.

Re: Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 10:09 pm
by Proposition Joe
Hitting Rev levels ('Revels'?) here.

Re: Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 10:59 pm
by Hoover Attack
Relentless

Re: Sky TV Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2025 8:50 am
by Hoover Attack
Stowaway wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2025 9:05 pm f*cking hell, what was Keeley doing for their second? 😡
Bloke was 3 yards out unmarked, what do you expect him to do with that?

(Josh has had a couple of moments lately - as you’d expect with a youngster learning on the job - but that wasn’t one of them).

Re: Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2025 9:27 am
by Proposition Joe
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2025 10:59 pm Relentless
Wahey, post signatures are back!

Re: Hi-lites vs Lincoln

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2025 9:30 am
by CEB2ElectricBoogaloo
North stand - no one died
South stand - no one died
West stand - no one died
East stand - someone died