Page 1 of 1
Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 1:35 am
by Captain Zep
What's this all about? Remember the old days when we'd watch professionals at the the top of their game?
Tyson is nearly 60 but 3/1 to beat a YouTuber, can that be right?
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:20 am
by RBMarshall
WTF! Serrano robbed. What were the judges on?
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:48 am
by RBMarshall
Proving the bookies are rarely wrong . You can't fight at 58 without legs.
Enjoy the 20 mill Mike.
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 7:28 am
by Bandy Legs
RBMarshall wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:20 am
WTF! Serrano robbed. What were the judges on?
How was Serrano robbed?
Taylor beat her up, more accurate scoring points & used her head exceptionally well.
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 7:30 am
by Currywurst and Chips
Glad I didn’t stay up for the circus main event and croooed decision against Serrano again
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 7:33 am
by Bandy Legs
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2024 7:30 am
Glad I didn’t stay up for the circus main event and croooed decision against Serrano again
What's a Croooed decision?
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:00 am
by Currywurst and Chips
Croooed sport at times
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:18 am
by Bandy Legs
at the above
https://www.secondsout.com/news/katie-t ... scorecard/
An Independent boxing magazine vs a disgruntled
losers opinion.
Landing punches on the arms doesn't equal landing punches to the head
Taylor wins 5 rounds Serrano 4 rounds with a Drawn 9-9 round that Taylor won but had a point deducted.
How is that Croooed?
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:57 am
by Currywurst and Chips
Never heard of them, irrelevant
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 9:02 am
by Bandy Legs
You not being knowledgeable is Irrelevant
95-94 x 3 means Taylor is 2-0 v The bad loser
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 9:49 am
by Proposition Joe
The Guardian had Serrano 95-94 so perhaps all the independent viewers didn't think it was that unanimous.
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:00 am
by Bandy Legs
Independent viewers aren't important.
Seconds out concentrate purely on boxing & not world news. Would be good if you could post the Guardians scorecard though just for reference though.
We Could compare it to the 3 judges scorecards
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:09 am
by Proposition Joe
Bandy Legs wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:00 am
Independent viewers aren't important.
Seconds out concentrate purely on boxing & not world news. Would be good if you could post the Guardians scorecard though just for reference though.
We Could compare it to the 3 judges scorecards
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/live/ ... acb4f00a1e
On the same minute by minute coverage prior to Tyson - Paul.
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:23 am
by Bandy Legs
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:09 am
Bandy Legs wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:00 am
Independent viewers aren't important.
Seconds out concentrate purely on boxing & not world news. Would be good if you could post the Guardians scorecard though just for reference though.
We Could compare it to the 3 judges scorecards
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/live/ ... acb4f00a1e
On the same minute by minute coverage prior to Tyson - Paul.
So an American reporter scored the win for Serrano, while 2 American Judges & 1 Canadian judge scored it a Unanimous win for Taylor. They are the Important viewers & the rest of us have opinions.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/boxing/articles/cje0n0qy9xlo
Still doesn't prove the fight was Croooed though as was stated originally.
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 11:21 am
by Proposition Joe
Doesn't prove anything, of course. Was just sharing an opinion I'd seen.
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2024 11:24 am
by Bandy Legs
That's fair enough, I'm just sharing mine.
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2024 12:57 am
by Adz
I watched the Tyson Paul fight. Looked like a standard exhibition job where Paul would have won easy if he wanted to, and Tyson was shot after 5 minutes.
Re: Paul v Tyson
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 8:04 pm
by Stan1972
Paul v Tyson was an embarrassment, Tyson should not be allowed to get back in a ring again.
You can’t even call it a fight, it was very sad to watch.
Tyson could just about walk, watching him slowly shuffling back to his corner every 2mins, was very sad.