Page 1 of 2
Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 9:33 am
by BengeO
There is now so much football on TV - so do we still need It?
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 9:42 am
by Cheshunto
Can’t remember the last time I actually watched it, as you say, we are already at ‘saturation’ point with so much Football on TV
It’s a bit irrelevant nowadays and maybe Lineker is going at a good time.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 9:59 am
by Hoover Attack
There’s hardly any football on terrestrial tv.
Of course it’s needed.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 10:27 am
by Constanza
Keep it, its a cue for the missus to go up to bed as soon as she hears the theme tune. It gives me some quality alone time to binge watch Emily in Paris, which I can't admit to watching.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:13 am
by Proposition Joe
We need less football on pay TV, removing a terrestrial highlights package would be a very odd move.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:15 am
by Hoover Attack
Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:13 am
We need less football on pay TV, removing a terrestrial highlights package would be a very odd move.
But BBC IS PAY TV AND THEY WASTE ALL MY MONEY ON LINEKER AND HIS LOONY LEFTY LIBERAL LOVIES.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:29 am
by Celtient
Viewing audiences are around 2 million, but 3 million tuned in that time when there were no presenters or tedious analysis. You would think the BBC might take something from that before handing out another load of our cash to another presenter
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:31 am
by JimbO
The problem it has that the demograph that watches it is slowly getting older so the viewing figures are slowly getting smaller. Anyone born around the start of the 70's and onwards has grown up used to having to pay a subscription to watch most football.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 12:16 pm
by Hoover Attack
Celtient wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:29 am
Viewing audiences are around 2 million, but 3 million tuned in that time when there were no presenters or tedious analysis. You would think the BBC might take something from that before handing out another load of our cash to another presenter
Oh come on. The increase was obviously due to the furore around the whole issue at the time. It was an awful watch (the no commentary bit, not the no analysis).
Can you imagine anyone saying, I don’t know, Strictly should sack the tall lady and the orange one and just have the dancing? It’s obviously nonsense.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 12:40 pm
by Celtient
I wouldn't know, I don't watch either
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 12:57 pm
by Celtient
I've often wished there was a mute button for certain commentators and their sidekicks which would leave the crowd noise on. A game with no Ally McCoist input would immediately be improved by 100%. I absholutely mean that, I really, really do, by the way
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:23 pm
by Give it to Jabo
TV Pundits come in for so much abuse. I am sure that it is more difficult than it looks. We do seem to have a lot of moaners in this country. It is SO easy to be a critic.
I have tried to watch those MOTD Spin-Offs with Jermaine Jenas etc. Could not get on with them.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 2:02 pm
by Max B Gold
Celtient wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 12:57 pm
I've often wished there was a mute button for certain commentators and their sidekicks which would leave the crowd noise on. A game with no Ally McCoist input would immediately be improved by 100%. I absholutely mean that, I really, really do, by the way
To be absolutely honest with you I agree. The little weasel has caused a stir in the village with his avaricious property development scheme which of course I am 100% not onside with.
https://www.thenational.scot/news/24623 ... idge-weir/
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 5:00 pm
by EliotNes
Mrs NES & I watch it once in a blue moon. But it's a tradition, therefore keep it IMO.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 6:33 pm
by MassiveForehead
Yes, it's needed for the people who don't have instant access to Youtube on their tv or those who dont want to watch highlights on VPN.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 7:03 pm
by gshaw
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 12:16 pm
Celtient wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:29 am
Viewing audiences are around 2 million, but 3 million tuned in that time when there were no presenters or tedious analysis. You would think the BBC might take something from that before handing out another load of our cash to another presenter
Oh come on. The increase was obviously due to the furore around the whole issue at the time. It was an awful watch (the no commentary bit, not the no analysis).
Can you imagine anyone saying, I don’t know, Strictly should sack the tall lady and the orange one and just have the dancing? It’s obviously nonsense.
Absolutely yes it needs to stay as it's one of the few programmes left on domestic channels. I don't think it needs a presenter on a 6-figure sum though, stick one of those AI avatars on to introduce each match job done.
Commentary yes we need that but you'd lose precious little if the 20 second intros between games and inane interviews with managers were removed.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 7:03 pm
by Currywurst and Chips
If you’re not Sky Plussing it and fast forwarding Shearer’s expert analysis and the post-match tunnel interviews you’re doing it wrong
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 7:15 pm
by North Stand Dave
In a word YES
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 7:17 pm
by Hoover Attack
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 7:03 pm
If you’re not Sky Plussing it and fast forwarding Shearer’s expert analysis and the post-match tunnel interviews you’re doing it wrong
Exactly.
Always worth watching Gary’s opening one line dig at the pundits but thereafter, FFW straight through to the games.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 7:19 pm
by Stowaway
I usually watch if I’m at home on a Saturday night (hint: usually) so I can catch up with what all the dorks are getting upset about every weekend. I don’t go to the O’s for quality of the football, so it’s nice to watch a bit of professional stuff without having to pay for cable or satellite.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 9:13 pm
by Rich Tea Wellin
People are weird. A decent top level highlights package on free to air.
Me and the missus avoid the prem scores and watch it to make it a bit more exciting. Then we fall asleep after one game and watch it in the morning. Exciting life
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2024 6:01 am
by ContrifibulatoryFred
I enjoy being able to watch MotD in order of how entertaining the games are. I can then switch off once I’ve seen the worthwhile highlights. That way I always get to avoid watching Everton - who are my least favourite team. I also tend to avoid it altogether when Liverpool feature prominently - unless they lose or draw that is.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2024 8:18 am
by Yanzi Gravy
I enjoy watching EFL better than MOTD, more honest football in lower leagues
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2024 8:20 am
by Dunners
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 9:13 pm
People are weird. A decent top level highlights package on free to air.
Me and the missus avoid the prem scores and watch it to make it a bit more exciting. Then we fall asleep after one game and watch it in the morning. Exciting life
Same. Exactly the same.
Re: Do we need MOTD?
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2024 9:34 am
by Hoover Attack
Dunners wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2024 8:20 am
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 9:13 pm
People are weird. A decent top level highlights package on free to air.
Me and the missus avoid the prem scores and watch it to make it a bit more exciting. Then we fall asleep after one game and watch it in the morning. Exciting life
Same. Exactly the same.
You watch MOTD with RTWs wife?