FORMATION

[faith1234]

Not working go to 442

[Fellowo]

Part of the trouble, far too predictable with our formation, it's simply 4-3-3 or 3-5-2.

[Rich Tea Wellin]

Part of the trouble, far too predictable with our formation, it's simply 4-3-3 or 3-5-2.

Only time I remember us 3-5-2 was Wrexham and even then it was more 3-4-3

[RedDwarf 1881]

Not working go to 442

It doesn’t matter what formation we play if our players are not good enough

[Long slender neck]

With our best depth at CB and virtually no wingers available, maybe we should do 532, making sure the wingbacks get high up the pitch

[RedDwarf 1881]

With our best depth at CB and virtually no wingers available, maybe we should do 532, making sure the wingbacks get high up the pitch

That’s a good idea and worth a try because nothing else seems to be working

[gshaw]

With our best depth at CB and virtually no wingers available, maybe we should do 532, making sure the wingbacks get high up the pitch

As much as I dislike that formation as a general rule (given it's rather negative) the assets we do have are at the back.

Playing every game like the Rotherham one kicking and scratching our way to 3 points looks our best bet the way it's going. Win ugly.