Long term plan: a theory

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 816 times
Been thanked: 935 times

Long term plan: a theory

Post by The Reverend »

The owners are shrewd. Travis knows football.

They have realised that financially they are never going to be able to mount a serious challenge in League 1. They also know that a couple of seasons plodding along in the bottom half of the table will result in attendances dropping.

They much preferred the days when we were challenging for titles (Conference & League 2), when the ground was sold out and merchandise was flying out of the shop. Realising that the club won’t be able to repeat this in league 1 they have decided that dropping back down to League 2 then mounting another title challenge will be much more profitable in the long run. Think an about it, what is more profitable?

Scenario A: Three seasons consecutively finishing 16-20th in league 1

Scenario B: season 1 = Relegated from League 1. Season 2 = win league 2, Season 3 = “back” in league 1

In scenario B season 1 will make the same amount of money as season 1 in scenario A. Season 2 in scenario B much more profitable than season 2 in scenario A, as would season 3 be (the “feel good” factor of being “back” in league 1).


It explains why we are relying exclusively on sub-par loanee signings, freebies and seriously considering putting a conference standard GK into our starting XI.
Lifelongfan
Fresh Alias
Posts: 837
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 204 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by Lifelongfan »

Rubbish
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 816 times
Been thanked: 935 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by The Reverend »

Lifelongfan wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:19 amRubbish
You think scenario A is more profitable than scenario B?
Brigs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 608
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:30 pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by Brigs »

I'd have been to embarrassed to
A have written that &
B pressed submit to publish it
PoundhillO
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2162
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:41 am
Has thanked: 391 times
Been thanked: 433 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by PoundhillO »

The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:17 am The owners are shrewd. Travis knows football.

They have realised that financially they are never going to be able to mount a serious challenge in League 1. They also know that a couple of seasons plodding along in the bottom half of the table will result in attendances dropping.

They much preferred the days when we were challenging for titles (Conference & League 2), when the ground was sold out and merchandise was flying out of the shop. Realising that the club won’t be able to repeat this in league 1 they have decided that dropping back down to League 2 then mounting another title challenge will be much more profitable in the long run. Think an about it, what is more profitable?

Scenario A: Three seasons consecutively finishing 16-20th in league 1

Scenario B: season 1 = Relegated from League 1. Season 2 = win league 2, Season 3 = “back” in league 1

In scenario B season 1 will make the same amount of money as season 1 in scenario A. Season 2 in scenario B much more profitable than season 2 in scenario A, as would season 3 be (the “feel good” factor of being “back” in league 1).


It explains why we are relying exclusively on sub-par loanee signings, freebies and seriously considering putting a conference standard GK into our starting XI.
I think Travis is shrewd but not that stupid, if scenario B were to happen and that is a massive risk it could continue forever and fans woudnt put up with it.
There is only one answer and that is get new investors with real money to further our ambitions or stagnate or be relegated and lose a great Manager in Ritchie Wellens.
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 816 times
Been thanked: 935 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by The Reverend »

Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:25 am I'd have been to embarrassed to
A have written that &
B pressed submit to publish it
You think scenario A is more profitable than scenario B?
Brigs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 608
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:30 pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by Brigs »

The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:27 am
Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:25 am I'd have been to embarrassed to
A have written that &
B pressed submit to publish it
You think scenario A is more profitable than scenario B?
We get more money directly from Sky in League 1
Your theory is beaten immediately.

You're belief that we can you between L2 & L1 suggests you haven't been an Orient fan for an awful long time.

Possibly since 2018?
Mistadobalina
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2433
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 244 times
Been thanked: 1126 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by Mistadobalina »

This is obviously bollox. Investors potential return relies upon us being at the highest level possible. Our losses as champions in league 2 were no less than the plodding seasons.
Lifelongfan
Fresh Alias
Posts: 837
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 204 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by Lifelongfan »

The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:17 am The owners are shrewd. Travis knows football.

They have realised that financially they are never going to be able to mount a serious challenge in League 1. They also know that a couple of seasons plodding along in the bottom half of the table will result in attendances dropping.

They much preferred the days when we were challenging for titles (Conference & League 2), when the ground was sold out and merchandise was flying out of the shop. Realising that the club won’t be able to repeat this in league 1 they have decided that dropping back down to League 2 then mounting another title challenge will be much more profitable in the long run. Think an about it, what is more profitable?

Scenario A: Three seasons consecutively finishing 16-20th in league 1

Scenario B: season 1 = Relegated from League 1. Season 2 = win league 2, Season 3 = “back” in league 1

In scenario B season 1 will make the same amount of money as season 1 in scenario A. Season 2 in scenario B much more profitable than season 2 in scenario A, as would season 3 be (the “feel good” factor of being “back” in league 1).


It explains why we are relying exclusively on sub-par loanee signings, freebies and seriously considering putting a conference standard GK into our starting XI.
You should be embarrassed to type that tbh
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 816 times
Been thanked: 935 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by The Reverend »

Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:32 am
The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:27 am
Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:25 am I'd have been to embarrassed to
A have written that &
B pressed submit to publish it
You think scenario A is more profitable than scenario B?
We get more money directly from Sky in League 1
Your theory is beaten immediately.

You're belief that we can you between L2 & L1 suggests you haven't been an Orient fan for an awful long time.

Possibly since 2018?
Can you repeat that in coherent English please?
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 816 times
Been thanked: 935 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by The Reverend »

Lifelongfan wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:32 am
The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:17 am The owners are shrewd. Travis knows football.

They have realised that financially they are never going to be able to mount a serious challenge in League 1. They also know that a couple of seasons plodding along in the bottom half of the table will result in attendances dropping.

They much preferred the days when we were challenging for titles (Conference & League 2), when the ground was sold out and merchandise was flying out of the shop. Realising that the club won’t be able to repeat this in league 1 they have decided that dropping back down to League 2 then mounting another title challenge will be much more profitable in the long run. Think an about it, what is more profitable?

Scenario A: Three seasons consecutively finishing 16-20th in league 1

Scenario B: season 1 = Relegated from League 1. Season 2 = win league 2, Season 3 = “back” in league 1

In scenario B season 1 will make the same amount of money as season 1 in scenario A. Season 2 in scenario B much more profitable than season 2 in scenario A, as would season 3 be (the “feel good” factor of being “back” in league 1).


It explains why we are relying exclusively on sub-par loanee signings, freebies and seriously considering putting a conference standard GK into our starting XI.
You should be embarrassed to type that tbh
Calm down dear. It’s just a theory.
Brigs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 608
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:30 pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by Brigs »

Predictive text
The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:51 am
Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:32 am
The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:27 am

You think scenario A is more profitable than scenario B?
We get more money directly from Sky in League 1
Your theory is beaten immediately.

You're belief that we can yoyo between L2 & L1 suggests you haven't been an Orient fan for an awful long time.

Possibly since 2018?
Can you repeat that in coherent English please?


We get more money directly from Sky in League 1
Your theory is beaten immediately.

You're belief that we can yoyo between L2 & L1 suggests you haven't been an Orient fan for an awful long time.

Possibly since 2018?
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 816 times
Been thanked: 935 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by The Reverend »

Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 11:09 am Predictive text
The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:51 am
Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:32 am

We get more money directly from Sky in League 1
Your theory is beaten immediately.

You're belief that we can yoyo between L2 & L1 suggests you haven't been an Orient fan for an awful long time.

Possibly since 2018?
Can you repeat that in coherent English please?


We get more money directly from Sky in League 1
Your theory is beaten immediately.

You're belief that we can yoyo between L2 & L1 suggests you haven't been an Orient fan for an awful long time.

Possibly since 2018?
How much more money do we get from Sky in League 1 than League 2? What is your source for that?
Story of O
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2876
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:29 pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 566 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by Story of O »

We would not be guaranteed to go straight back up after going down
Brigs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 608
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:30 pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by Brigs »

The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 11:14 am
Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 11:09 am Predictive text
The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:51 am

Can you repeat that in coherent English please?


We get more money directly from Sky in League 1
Your theory is beaten immediately.

You're belief that we can yoyo between L2 & L1 suggests you haven't been an Orient fan for an awful long time.

Possibly since 2018?
How much more money do we get from Sky in League 1 than League 2? What is your source for that?
What do you mean what is my source?
It's been the talk of football since the deal was done!
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7700
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3393 times
Been thanked: 1750 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by gshaw »

Not quite sold on that theory but as an offshoot if you take

a) L1 wages vs L2
b) TV money L1 vs L2
c) average attendance / ST sales L1 vs L2

Which league is more "sustainable" to use an NT catchphrase with the current ground and infrastructure? Club lost £4 million last season, some of which was promotion bonuses. What will we be on track for this season I wonder?

It appears this season the purse strings have been tightened and he's hoping Richie's talent can keep this ragtag band of youth players, loans and a handful of journeymen in League 1. If it goes wrong then you have the base of a League 2 squad (though getting back up would be very tough)
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 816 times
Been thanked: 935 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by The Reverend »

Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 11:28 am
The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 11:14 am
Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 11:09 am Predictive text




We get more money directly from Sky in League 1
Your theory is beaten immediately.

You're belief that we can yoyo between L2 & L1 suggests you haven't been an Orient fan for an awful long time.

Possibly since 2018?
How much more money do we get from Sky in League 1 than League 2? What is your source for that?
What do you mean what is my source?
It's been the talk of football since the deal was done!
You’ve just confidently stated that the club would received more from Sky in league 1 than in league 2. What is your source for this claim?
Brigs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 608
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:30 pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by Brigs »

The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:03 pm
Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 11:28 am
The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 11:14 am

How much more money do we get from Sky in League 1 than League 2? What is your source for that?
What do you mean what is my source?
It's been the talk of football since the deal was done!
You’ve just confidently stated that the club would received more from Sky in league 1 than in league 2. What is your source for this claim?
https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... per-season

https://www.90min.com/posts/league-two- ... 20division.

Every League Two side is given a base fee of £472,000 no matter where they finish, as well as a £430,000 solidarity payment from the Premier League. However, promotion to League One brings huge financial benefits, with those figures rising to £677,000 and £642,000 in the third division.14 May 2024
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 816 times
Been thanked: 935 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by The Reverend »

Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:12 pm
The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:03 pm
Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 11:28 am

What do you mean what is my source?
It's been the talk of football since the deal was done!
You’ve just confidently stated that the club would received more from Sky in league 1 than in league 2. What is your source for this claim?
https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... per-season

https://www.90min.com/posts/league-two- ... 20division.

Every League Two side is given a base fee of £472,000 no matter where they finish, as well as a £430,000 solidarity payment from the Premier League. However, promotion to League One brings huge financial benefits, with those figures rising to £677,000 and £642,000 in the third division.14 May 2024
Who pays those fees?
Brigs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 608
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:30 pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by Brigs »

The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:17 pm
Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:12 pm
The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:03 pm

You’ve just confidently stated that the club would received more from Sky in league 1 than in league 2. What is your source for this claim?
https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... per-season

https://www.90min.com/posts/league-two- ... 20division.

Every League Two side is given a base fee of £472,000 no matter where they finish, as well as a £430,000 solidarity payment from the Premier League. However, promotion to League One brings huge financial benefits, with those figures rising to £677,000 and £642,000 in the third division.14 May 2024
Who pays those fees?
Read the articles ,
I'm sure it'll explain it for you
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 816 times
Been thanked: 935 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by The Reverend »

Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:18 pm
The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:17 pm
Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:12 pm

https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... per-season

https://www.90min.com/posts/league-two- ... 20division.

Every League Two side is given a base fee of £472,000 no matter where they finish, as well as a £430,000 solidarity payment from the Premier League. However, promotion to League One brings huge financial benefits, with those figures rising to £677,000 and £642,000 in the third division.14 May 2024
Who pays those fees?
Read the articles ,
I'm sure it'll explain it for you
I’ve read both. The second article says nothing about Sky paying those fees.

The first article shows that Sky show an equal number of league 1 and league 2 fixtures.

So where exactly are you basing your claim that the club would receive more from Sky in league 1 than they would in League 2?
essexfootball
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1219
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:24 am
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by essexfootball »

The owners need to wake up and realise investment in players can pay more than anything else, some shrewd cheap investments in young talent from League Two, National League etc, could be worth millions in a seasons time
Brigs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 608
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:30 pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by Brigs »

The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:22 pm
Brigs wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:18 pm
The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:17 pm

Who pays those fees?
Read the articles ,
I'm sure it'll explain it for you
I’ve read both. The second article says nothing about Sky paying those fees.

The first article shows that Sky show an equal number of league 1 and league 2 fixtures.

So where exactly are you basing your claim that the club would receive more from Sky in league 1 than they would in League 2?
" Every League Two side is given a base fee of £472,000 no matter where they finish, as well as a £430,000 solidarity payment from the Premier League. However, promotion to League One brings huge financial benefits, with those figures rising to £677,000 and £642,000 in the third division.14 May 2024"
Omygawd
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2424
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:12 pm
Has thanked: 764 times
Been thanked: 766 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by Omygawd »

There’s a few too many Spen traits starting to show through…….
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12506
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2556 times

Re: Long term plan: a theory

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:52 am
Lifelongfan wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:32 am
The Reverend wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:17 am The owners are shrewd. Travis knows football.

They have realised that financially they are never going to be able to mount a serious challenge in League 1. They also know that a couple of seasons plodding along in the bottom half of the table will result in attendances dropping.

They much preferred the days when we were challenging for titles (Conference & League 2), when the ground was sold out and merchandise was flying out of the shop. Realising that the club won’t be able to repeat this in league 1 they have decided that dropping back down to League 2 then mounting another title challenge will be much more profitable in the long run. Think an about it, what is more profitable?

Scenario A: Three seasons consecutively finishing 16-20th in league 1

Scenario B: season 1 = Relegated from League 1. Season 2 = win league 2, Season 3 = “back” in league 1

In scenario B season 1 will make the same amount of money as season 1 in scenario A. Season 2 in scenario B much more profitable than season 2 in scenario A, as would season 3 be (the “feel good” factor of being “back” in league 1).


It explains why we are relying exclusively on sub-par loanee signings, freebies and seriously considering putting a conference standard GK into our starting XI.
You should be embarrassed to type that tbh
Calm down dear. It’s just a theory.
And as theories go it's rubbish . If there was even a hint of that being a reality Richie would be away like a hare .No self respecting manager would ever tolerate such an approach .
Post Reply