Page 1 of 21

Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 12:03 am
by E10EU
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/art ... -wisconsin

Maybe there is hope for the US after all?
Big donations for her campaign have flooded in. Brave, intelligent, gutsy, accomplished - what's not to like?

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 7:47 am
by o-no
Certainly the energy level of the Dems campaign has gone through the roof, she seems competent to me, and maybe the momentum from a shorter campaign will carry her over the line. On the other hand, Americans...

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 8:16 am
by Friend or fart
Simples: she has got brains, Trump hasn't- whether or not the Yanks can work out that conundrum, is another matter.

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 9:04 am
by Dunners
I dunno. I'm not sure I could look past her laugh.

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 9:52 am
by The Mindsweep
Dunners wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 9:04 am I dunno. I'm not sure I could look past her laugh.
And she's a childless cat lady

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 11:09 am
by Rich Tea Wellin
Her biggest problem is that she’s an Asian Caribbean American who is intelligent. All the things a lot of yanks, and especially the right, are scared of. It might do her in.

Oh and she’s a woman and getting over that barrier will be hardest against someone like trump

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 11:18 am
by Long slender neck
How does she poll with centrists?

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 11:42 am
by Celtient
The Mindsweep wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 9:52 am
Dunners wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 9:04 am I dunno. I'm not sure I could look past her laugh.
And she's a childless cat lady
Didn't know about the cats FFS. It's Trumpet for me then

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 11:46 am
by Dunners
Long slender neck wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 11:18 am How does she poll with centrists?
No idea. I just come across this poll showing voting intentions over three identifiers. What's interesting about it is that Trump has increased his vote share with black voters. He had 8% of them vote for him in 2020.

Image

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 12:01 pm
by Long slender neck
Well he is the least racist president, ever.

I'm surprised his women numbers are that good considering.

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 12:50 pm
by Celtient
Celtient wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 11:42 am
The Mindsweep wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 9:52 am
Dunners wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 9:04 am I dunno. I'm not sure I could look past her laugh.
And she's a childless cat lady
Didn't know about the cats FFS. It's Trumpet for me then
Wonder if Trumpet will try to grab her kitty?

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 12:51 pm
by Celtient
Censorship kicked in there

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:08 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
All I’m going to say is they have just handed the Presidency to Trump

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:40 pm
by oxo
Absolutely wild that Trump is going to be president again. The USA has completely lost its sh*t

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:45 pm
by LittleMate
oxo wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:40 pm Absolutely wild that Trump is going to be president again. The USA has completely lost its sh*t
Agreed. The more outrageous the politician, the more likely the Americans seem to like him.

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:53 pm
by Mistadobalina
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:08 pm All I’m going to say is they have just handed the Presidency to Trump
And if it turns out they haven't, you'll say it's a conspiracy anyway. No lose scenario really.

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 3:40 pm
by The Mindsweep
Hearing Trump is rethinking his VP pick


Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:00 pm
by RedDwarf 1881
Mistadobalina wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:53 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:08 pm All I’m going to say is they have just handed the Presidency to Trump
And if it turns out they haven't, you'll say it's a conspiracy anyway. No lose scenario really.
Well, let’s just hope there are no shenanigans this time . For example, postal ballots without any signatures on them which were wide open to fraud. Hopefully this election will have more integrity about it so people can abide by whatever the result is without complaint or suspicions.

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:08 pm
by Mistadobalina
Distinctly remember you saying at the time you thought the election was stolen before a single baseless conspiracy theory was even put forward. You just 'knew' it to be true.

Do you not see how arriving at a conclusion before any evidence has been offered ( and to be clear none ever was found anyway ) might suggest you've been a bit sucked in? That it's a bit of a strange worldview to think that if Trump wins, it's real, but if he doesn't, it's a fix?

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:14 pm
by Proposition Joe
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:00 pm
Mistadobalina wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:53 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:08 pm All I’m going to say is they have just handed the Presidency to Trump
And if it turns out they haven't, you'll say it's a conspiracy anyway. No lose scenario really.
Well, let’s just hope there are no shenanigans this time . For example, postal ballots without any signatures on them which were wide open to fraud. Hopefully this election will have more integrity about it so people can abide by whatever the result is without complaint or suspicions.
What lack of integrity was there in the last election, other than the sitting President refusing to accept he lost and putting pressure on others to 'find votes'?

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:40 pm
by Celtient
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:00 pm
Mistadobalina wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:53 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:08 pm All I’m going to say is they have just handed the Presidency to Trump
And if it turns out they haven't, you'll say it's a conspiracy anyway. No lose scenario really.
Well, let’s just hope there are no shenanigans this time . For example, postal ballots without any signatures on them which were wide open to fraud. Hopefully this election will have more integrity about it so people can abide by whatever the result is without complaint or suspicions.
Hear!Hear! Trumpet is the byword for integrity and I would hate to see him cheated again! If he does fall foul to cheating this time around, I hope the good ole boys will take up arms and show those liberal candy-asses what's what

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2024 9:34 pm
by Rubex Kube
The Mindsweep wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 3:40 pm Hearing Trump is rethinking his VP pick

The Russians don't like him, neither it seems do Americans

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2024 12:10 am
by RedDwarf 1881
Proposition Joe wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:14 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:00 pm
Mistadobalina wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:53 pm

And if it turns out they haven't, you'll say it's a conspiracy anyway. No lose scenario really.
Well, let’s just hope there are no shenanigans this time . For example, postal ballots without any signatures on them which were wide open to fraud. Hopefully this election will have more integrity about it so people can abide by whatever the result is without complaint or suspicions.
What lack of integrity was there in the last election, other than the sitting President refusing to accept he lost and putting pressure on others to 'find votes'?
We all spoke about this back in 2020. I'm not going to go through it all again .

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2024 6:37 am
by Proposition Joe
If you don't want to rake over old ground, perhaps stop repeating the same baseless accusations.

Re: Harris v. Trump

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2024 7:51 am
by EastDerehamO
On the one hand we have a former President who refused to believe he lost last election, despite the democracy of the vote.

And against him now the Vice-President, who was willing to deceive the American public and back the existing President for the job for another four years, despite the fact she must have known he wasn’t fit for it. Then along came the TV debate and made it glaringly obvious to everyone he wasn’t up to it, so realising the cat was out the bag and they were onto a loser, she then takes over late in the day as the nominee.

What a choice!